Skip to content

Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Oct 30 2019

M/S One Up Trade Net Works Pvt Ltd vs.commissioner of Delhi Value Adde ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-30-2019

$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11469/2019 M/S ONE UP TRADE NET WORKS PVT LTD Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX DEPARTMENT OF TRADE & TAXES ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Satyakam, ASC with Mr. J.P. Bhatia, VATO Department (GNCTD) CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral) CM APPL. 47165/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 11469/2019 1. Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the present writ petition has been filed seeking refund of Rs.74,32,421/- alongwith interest under Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 for the fourth quarter, i.e. 1st January 2014 to 31st March, 2014 on the ground that the input tax credit is more than output tax credit. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that an application for refund had...


Oct 30 2019

Brightpoint India Pvt Ltd vs.union of India & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-30-2019

$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 9159/2019 BRIGHTPOINT INDIA PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Karan Sachdev and Ms. Avisha Khatri, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with for Ms. Kirti Awasthi, Adv. respondent No.1 Mr. Amit Bansal, Sr. Standing with Mr. Aman Rewaria and Ms. Annu Singh, Advs. for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER3010.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) 1. This writ petition has been preferred challenging the order passed by the Revisional Authority of the respondents dated 6th August, 2018 (Annexure P-1 to the memo of this writ petition). The revision was preferred by the petitioner on 14th June, 2016, which was rejected by the Revisional Authority. No notice was given by the Revisional Authority to the petitioner that there was a defective filing. Thereafter, a personal hearing was also gi...


Oct 30 2019

Sh. Manish Kumar Mathur & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-30-2019

$~46 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 5541/2019 Date of decision:30. 10.2019 SH. MANISH KUMAR MATHUR & ORS. Through Mr. Sanjay Mishra, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus STATE & ANR. Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Girish Gaur, Adv. for R-2 with respondent no.2 in person SI Ranvir Singh, PS Roop Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 39265/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5541/201 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.0243/2018 dated 21.11.2018 registered at Police Station Roop Nagar and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C. 5541/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got marr...


Oct 30 2019

Raman Sharma & Anr vs.director, Directorate of Enforcement & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-30-2019

$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. 10.2019 + CRL.REV.P. 1033/2019 RAMAN SHARMA & ANR Through: Mr. R. Tyagi, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ANR. Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sp. Counsel for ........ RESPONDENTS Enforcement Directorate with Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 37123/2019 (Exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. CRL.REV.P. 1033/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to set aside the order dated 31.08.2019 passed by learned Special Judge (P.C.Act) CBI-10, Rouse Avenue Courts, New Delhi in case CC722019 tiled as "Raman Sharma and Anr. vs. Director, Directorate of Enforcement and CRL.REV. P.1033/2019 Page 1 of 11 Anr." 4. The petitioner herein filed the criminal complaint for the continuing organised offences codified inter-alia under the Indian Penal...


Oct 30 2019

Neelam Rani vs.south Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-30-2019

$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11452/2019 NEELAM RANI Through: Mr. M. Hasibuddin, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS Through: Mr. Amrit Pal Singh, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Arun Birbal & Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advs. for DDA Mr. Sumit Agarwal, Adv. for R-3 ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral) 1. Having heard the counsel for both sides and looking into the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that this Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers: a. Direct the respondent no.l to close the mutton 85 chicken Shop bearing no.19 situated at J Block, Nearby Bus Stand, DDA Market, Saket, New Delhi in the interest of public at large. b. Pass any other or further orders as this Honble Court may be deemed fit and proper in the given facts and circumstances of the case and in the i...


Oct 30 2019

Su-Kam Power Systems Ltd. Vs.mr. Kunwer Sachdev & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-30-2019

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1155/2018 & I.As.13597/2018 AND143092018 SU-KAM POWER SYSTEMS LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anuj Berry, Mr. Abhey J.V., Mr. Saksham Dhingra, Mr. Vinay Tripathi Mr. Malak Bhatt, Ms. Apoorva Murali and Ms. Surabhi Bhandari, Advocates. versus MR. KUNWER SACHDEV & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr.Rajeev Virmani, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Ajay Bhargava, Mr.Ankur Sangal, Ms.Sucheta Roy, Ms.Richa Bhargava,, Ms.Saugaat Khurana and Ms.Niharika, Advocates. % 11th October, 2019 Reserved on: Date of Decision:30. h October, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: I.A. 1411/2019 1. Present application has been filed by the plaintiff company through its resolution professional, under Order XIIIA of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for summary judgment against the defendants. It is pertinent to mention that the present suit has been filed for declaration, permanent injunction, damages a...


Oct 30 2019

Khajanchi and Ors. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-30-2019

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: October 30, 2019 + W.P.(CRL) 2486/2019 KHAJANCHI AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Neeraj and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocates STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Avi Singh, ASC with Mr. Tanuj Bhadana, Advocate for State/R-1 with SI Dhankar Singh, P.S.: Prasad Nagar... RESPONDENTS in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral) 1. Quashing of FIR No.0100/2019, under Sections 323/341/5IPC, registered at police station Prasad Nagar, Delhi is sought on the ground that the dispute between the parties stands amicably settled.... RESPONDENTS are present in the court today and submit that they have settled the dispute with the petitioners without any undue influence, coercion or pressure from any source whatsoever.2. Notice.3. Mr. Avi Singh, learned ASC for the respondent/State accepts notice and submits that the status report has been filed and the facts W.P.(Crl....


Oct 30 2019

Manjeet Singh Chugh vs.state & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-30-2019

$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h October, 2019 + CRL.REV.P. 633/2014 & Crl.M.A. 15906/2014 MANJEET SINGH CHUGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Rajat Aneja, Adv. with Ms.Chandrika Gupta, Adv. Versus STATE & ORS Through Mr.K.K. Ghei, APP for State. ........ RESPONDENTS SI Bansi Lal PS K.M. Pur. Mr.Anupam S. Sharrma, SPP with Mr.Eric Karan Sharma, Adv. for CBI. Mr.Siddharth Satija, Adv. for Mr.Siddharth Aggarwal, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to set aside/quash the impugned Order dated 06.09.2014 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-03, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi District, New Delhi in the case bearing CC No.45/2014 titled "Registrar General, High Court of Delhi Vs. Inspector Ashok Kumar and others", within the CRL.REV.P. 633/2014 Page 1 of 3 jurisdiction of P.S. Tilak Marg under Sections 193/1IPC.2. The present petition has been ...


Oct 30 2019

Naresh Nagpal & Ors. Vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-30-2019

$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 1222/2019 % NARESH NAGPAL & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Vaibhav Mehra, Adv. Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS...... RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ramesh Singh, Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Mr. Chirayu Jain and Mr. Ishan Agrawal, Advs. for GNCTD CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER3010.2019 D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) W.P.(C) No.1222/2019 1. Counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with a view to prefer an appeal against the impugned order dated 4th May, 2018 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, North- West District, New Delhi in accordance with the provisions of the Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens (Amendment) Rules, 2016. Permission, as prayed for, is granted. This writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn without entering into the merits of the case. As and when such appeal is pref...


Oct 30 2019

Corruption Against Society (Regd) vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-30-2019

$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11457/2019 CORRUPTION AGAINST SOCIETY (REGD) Through: Mr. Arun Kaushal, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Hetu Arora Sethi, ASC (GNCTD) with Mr. Rahul Jain, Adv. for R-1 to R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral) CM APPL. 47065/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 11457/2019 1. This Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers: (a) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing thereby the respondent No.1 to 5 to comply with the order dated 14.09.2011 as passed by this Hon'ble court in a Writ Petition (Civil) no.6692/2011 titled as Loose Flower and Cut Flower (Commission Agent) Grower and Traders Welfare Association Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors. and to ensure that no l...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial