Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sh. Manish Kumar Mathur & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.

Sh. Manish Kumar Mathur & Ors. vs State & Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 30, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1226328

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sh. Manish Kumar Mathur & Ors.

Respondent

State & Anr.

Excerpt

.....of their well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement before the learned principal judge, family court, central district, tis hazari courts, delhi vide order dated 06.03.2019 and settled all their disputes amicably.8. the total settlement amount is ₹15,00,000/-(rupees fifteen lakhs only). it is submitted that the respondent no.2 has already received an amount of ₹10 lakhs (rupees ten lakhs only). a demand draft bearing no.013659 dated 17.10.2019 for the balance amount of ₹5,00,000/- (rupees five lakhs only) has been handed over to the respondent no.2 today in the court.9. the complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been crl.m.c. 5541/2019 page 2 of 3 identified by si ranvir singh of police station roop nagar and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.10. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the concerned fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.11. for the reasons afore-recorded, the of fir no.0243/2018 dated 21.11.2018 registered at police station roop nagar and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.12. the petition is allowed accordingly.13. dasti. (suresh kumar kait) judge october30 2019 ms crl.m.c. 5541/2019 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~46 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 5541/2019 Date of decision:

30. 10.2019 SH. MANISH KUMAR MATHUR & ORS. Through Mr. Sanjay Mishra, Adv. ........ Petitioner

s versus STATE & ANR. Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS

Mr. Girish Gaur, Adv. for R-2 with respondent no.2 in person SI Ranvir Singh, PS Roop Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT

(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 39265/2019 1.

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5541/201 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.0243/2018 dated 21.11.2018 registered at Police Station Roop Nagar and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C. 5541/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.

5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 31.10.2017 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 04.03.2018.

7. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement before the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi vide order dated 06.03.2019 and settled all their disputes amicably.

8. The total settlement amount is ₹15,00,000/-(Rupees Fifteen Lakhs only). It is submitted that the respondent no.2 has already received an amount of ₹10 lakhs (Rupees Ten Lakhs only). A demand draft bearing No.013659 dated 17.10.2019 for the balance amount of ₹5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only) has been handed over to the respondent No.2 today in the Court.

9. The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been CRL.M.C. 5541/2019 Page 2 of 3 identified by SI Ranvir Singh of Police Station Roop Nagar and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

10. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.

11. For the reasons afore-recorded, the of FIR No.0243/2018 dated 21.11.2018 registered at Police Station Roop Nagar and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

12. The petition is allowed accordingly.

13. Dasti. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE OCTOBER30 2019 ms CRL.M.C. 5541/2019 Page 3 of 3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial