Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.lalita Sharma & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 979/2015 & CM APPL. 31031/2015 Decided on:10. 10.2019 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. C.S. Parashar, Advocate. versus LALITA SHARMA & ORS ......... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajkumar Mittal, Advocate for R- 1 to R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. The award of compensation dated 18.09.2015 passed by the learned MACT in Case No.8has been impugned on the ground that the offending vehicle involved in the motor-vehicular accident, was never identified. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that even the police officer, who had purportedly seized the vehicle, had not identified or mentioned the number of the vehicle in his deposition and the chargesheet too was not filed.2. The aforesaid argument is untenable as it is contrary to the records. Head Constable Vishambhar Das had stated that he had witnessed the MAC.APP. No.979/2015 Page 1 of 4 accident from a distance ...
Gaurav Arora & Ors. Vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:09. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 2365/2019 GAURAV ARORA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Vijay Kumar Sharma, Adv. versus STATE & ANR Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS ASI Koyal, PS Mangol Puri R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.1146/2015 registered at Police Station Mangol Puri, Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.4. The petitioner no.1 and respondent No.2 got married on 02.12.2014 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the CRL.M.C. 2365/2019 Page 1 of 3 petitioner No.1 and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 31.05.20...
Dilpreet Singh Gandhi vs.neeraj & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. 10.2019 RC.REV. 173/2018 DILPREET SINGH GANDHI versus NEERAJ & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. H.S. Arora, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Shailesh Kumar, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) (stay), CM RC.REV. 173/2018 & CM APPL.16893/2018 APPL.13021/2019 (seeking directions for payment of user charges) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 08.11.2017, whereby, leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from one shop measuring 15 sq. yards in property No.386, Ground Floor, Kucha RC.REV. 173/2018 Page 1 of 5 Bulaqui Begum, Dariba Kalan, Delhi, more parti...
M/S. Santur Construction & Finance (P) Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:09. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) 3634/2016 M/S. SANTUR CONSTRUCTION & FINANCE (P) LTD. Through: Mr. M.P. Bhargava, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for LAC/L&B. Ms. Sapna Chauhan, Advocate for DDA. Ms. Sunita Ojha and Ms. J.Priyadarshini, Advocates for R-1 & 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA SANJEEV NARULA, J.(Oral):1.... Petitioner has filed the present writ petition, seeking a declaration under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter the 2013 Act) that, the land acquisition proceedings in respect to land admeasuring 1 Bigha 5 Biswas of land comprised in Khasra No.1442/2, situated in revenue Estate of Village Chattarpur, Tehsil Hauz Khas, New Delhi (hereinafter as subject land), was acquire...
Midas Netcom Limited (In vol.liqn.) Vs....
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~C-20 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:09. 10.2019 + CO.PET. 18/2019 MIDAS NETCOM LIMITED (IN VOL.LIQN.) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocate for OL CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a company petition, preferred under Section 497 (6) of the Companies Act, 1956. The prayer made in the petition is that the subject company, i.e. Midas Netcom Limited, be dissolved from the date of the filing of the instant petition.2. The record shows that the subject Company was incorporated on 29.02.1988, with the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi and Haryana. The Corporate Identity Number of the Company is U74899DL1998PLC030794. The registered office of the subject Company is stated to be situated within the territory of the NCT of Delhi, at B-66, First Floor, Vivek Vihar, New Delhi - 110095.3. The authorised share capital of the company is Rs. 2,50,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crores and Fifty Lakhs Only), divided into 25...
Inderjeet vs.delhi Transport Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~5 & 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:09. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) No.684/2013 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: Mr.Sarfaraz Khan,Adv. ........ Petitioner versus INDERJIT Through: Mr.G.S. Charya,Adv. ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 5325/2013 ........ Petitioner INDERJEET Through: Mr.G.S. Charya, Adv. versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present decision disposes of two writ petitions; while WP(C) No.684/2013 preferred by the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC)/Management assails the Award dated 31.08.2012 passed by the Labour Court in ID No.331/08/1997, WP(C) No.5325/2013 preferred by the workman seeks a direction to the DTC to reinstate him with all consequential benefits. For the sake of convenience, the parties are WP(C) Nos.684/2013 & 5325/2013 Page 1 of 5 being referred to by their nomenclature in WP(C) No.684/2013.2. The respondent, while serving i...
Naveen Saroha vs.airline Allied Services Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~A-18 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:09. 10.2019 + O.M.P. (MISC.) 39/2019, I.A. No.13956/2019 (Exemption) NAVEEN SAROHA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Deepak Kohli, Mr. Mohd. Shariq, Mr. Neeraj Ansari, Advocates versus AIRLINE ALLIED SERVICES LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Padma Priya and Ms. Aditi Sharma, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.13956/2019 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. O.M.P. (MISC.) 39/2019 1. Issue notice.2. Ms. Padma Priya, Advocate enters appearance on behalf of the respondent and accepts notice of the petition.3. The present petition has been filed under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking extension of time for completion of the arbitral proceedings and passing of the Award.4. Arbitral Tribunal entered reference on 21.07.2017. The OMP (MISC) No.39/2019 Page 1 of 2 statutory period of 1...
Kailash Aggarwal & Associates vs.tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~A-17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 400/2017 Date of decision:09. 10.2019 KAILASH AGGARWAL & ASSOCIATES. Through Mr.Vinay Gautam, Adv. ....... Petitioner versus TATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Rijul Taneja, Adv. for GNCTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, (ORAL) 1. The dispute here is a limited dispute, namely, challenge to letter dated 29.6.2015 by which the respondent has demanded a sum of Rs.79,551/- from the petitioners. The case of the petitioners is that the petitioners sought a new connection in the premises at 7A/3A, Rajpura Road, Delhi. The scheme for electrification was framed and a Demand Note was issued for Rs.10,52,313/- on 21.1.2007. It is claimed that this amount was deposited by the petitioner. Subsequently, now the grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent has now enhanced the costs of the project to Rs.11,33,551/- whereas the original estimate was issued for Rs.10,54,000/-.2. Learned co...
Roshan Lal vs.delhi Jal Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA6542019 ROSHAN LAL Through: Mr. Vishal Tewari, Advocate ..... Appellant versus ..... Respondent Through: None DELHI JAL BOARD CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON % ORDER0910.2019 C.M.Appln.44471/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. LPA6542019 & C.M.Appln.44470/2019 (by the appellant u/S5r/w Section 14 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 442 days in filing the appeal), C.M.Appln.44472/2019 (by the appellant u/S151CPC for additional documents) 1. The appellant/petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 18.05.2018, passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing a petition filed by him impugning the Award dated 11.10.2017, passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, answering the Reference against him.2. By the impugned order, the petition filed by the appellant/petitioner has been dismissed by the learned Single Judge by observing that...
Zuber Khan & Ors. Vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:09. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5070/2019 ZUBER KHAN & ORS. Through Mr. Israr Ahmad, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State ASI Shyam Sunder, PS Palam Village Mr. Dharmender Sharma, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl. M.A. . 37582/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5070/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.0344/2016 dated 20.09.2016 registered at Police Station Palam Village and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C. 5070/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and further with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 11.11.2011. Due...
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- Next ›
- Last »