Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Zuber Khan & Ors. Vs.state & Anr

Zuber Khan & Ors. vs State & Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 09, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1225814

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Zuber Khan & Ors.

Respondent

State & Anr

Excerpt

.....respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relatives have entered into an amicable settlement vide order dated 11.04.2019 before family court, dwarka, new delhi and settled all their disputes amicably.8. the total settlement amount is ₹3,75,000/-(rupees three lacs seventy five thousand only). it is submitted that the respondent no.2 has already received an amount of ₹ 2,00,000/- (rupees two lacs). balance amount of ₹1,75,000/- (rupees one lac seventy five thousand only) is handed over to the respondent no.2 in cash today in the court.9. the complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by si dharmender sharma of police station palam village and submits that since the matter has been settled, therefore, she does not wish to crl.m.c. 5070/2019 page 2 of 3 prosecute the petitioners any further.10. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the concerned fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.11. for the reasons afore-recorded, the fir no.0344/2016 dated 20.09.2016 and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.12. the petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.13. order dasti, under the signature of court master. (suresh kumar kait) judge ocotber09 2019 ms crl.m.c. 5070/2019 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:

09. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5070/2019 ZUBER KHAN & ORS. Through Mr. Israr Ahmad, Adv. ........ Petitioner

s versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS

Through Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State ASI Shyam Sunder, PS Palam Village Mr. Dharmender Sharma, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT

(ORAL) Crl. M.A. . 37582/2019 1.

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5070/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.0344/2016 dated 20.09.2016 registered at Police Station Palam Village and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C. 5070/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.

5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and further with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 11.11.2011. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, they started living separately.

7. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relatives have entered into an amicable settlement vide order dated 11.04.2019 before Family Court, Dwarka, New Delhi and settled all their disputes amicably.

8. The total settlement amount is ₹3,75,000/-(Rupees Three Lacs Seventy Five Thousand only). It is submitted that the respondent no.2 has already received an amount of ₹ 2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lacs). Balance amount of ₹1,75,000/- (Rupees One Lac Seventy Five Thousand Only) is handed over to the respondent no.2 in cash today in the Court.

9. The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by SI Dharmender Sharma of Police Station Palam Village and submits that since the matter has been settled, therefore, she does not wish to CRL.M.C. 5070/2019 Page 2 of 3 prosecute the petitioners any further.

10. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.

11. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.0344/2016 dated 20.09.2016 and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

12. The petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

13. Order dasti, under the signature of Court Master. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE OCOTBER09 2019 ms CRL.M.C. 5070/2019 Page 3 of 3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial