Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Namit Kumar vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
$~70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5206/2019 NAMIT KUMAR ........ Petitioner STATE & ANR. Through Mr.Lohit Ganguly, Adv. versus Through Mr.Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for ........ RESPONDENTS State. SI Satish Kumar EOW. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 38040/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5206/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.134/2014 dated 16.02.2014, registered at PS Alipur, for the offences punishable under Sections 354 IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom. CRL.M.C.5206/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The present petition is filed on the ground that the p...
Bhupal Singh Bisht vs.rajesh Kumar Yadav & Ors (National Insurance Co. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 656/2018 Decided on:14. 10.2019 BHUPAL SINGH BISHT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Manish Maini and Ms. Hreeshika Bhargava, Advocates. versus RAJESH KUMAR YADAV & ORS (NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate for insurance company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) CM APPL. 28386/2018 (for delay of 19 days in filing) 1. This application seeks condonation of delay of 19 days in filing of the appeal.2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay is condoned.3. The application stands disposed-off. MAC.APP. 656/2018 4. This appeal seeks enhancement of the award of the compensation dated 11.12.2017 passed by the learned MACT in DAR No.11266/16, inter MAC.APP. No.656/2018 Page 1 of 3 alia, on the ground that the age of the injured on the date of the motor vehicular accident was 55 years and 10 months, as is recorded in his High School Certificate (at page...
Dinesh Kumar @ Dinesh Kumar Gautam vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
$~62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5141/2019 DINESH KUMAR @ DINESH KUMAR GAUTAM ........ Petitioner STATE & ANR. Through Mr.Yogesh Gaur, Adv. versus Through Mr.Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: State. ASI Shivom PS Gazipur. Mr.Deepak Gautam, Adv. for R-2. SI Sanyogita CAW Cell East Distt. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT Crl. M.A. 37884/2019 JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5141/2019 & Crl.M.A. 37885/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.558/2013 dated 18.12.2013 registered at Police Station Ghazipur and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C.5141/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner no.1 and re...
Rahul Gupta vs.m/s Almond Infrabuild Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
+ ARB.P. 497/2019 RAHUL GUPTA Date of decision:14. h October, 2019 ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Ashish Mohan, Advocate. versus M/S ALMOND INFRABUILD PVT. LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Kartik Nayar, Advocate. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~A~3 * % CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The reply is not on record. A copy of the reply has been received by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Photocopy of the reply has been handed over in Court.2. Mr. Nayar, learned counsel for the respondent fairly submits on instructions from his clients that he has no objection to the appointment of an Arbitrator.3. This petition is filed under Section 11 with respect to the Buyers Agreement and the Memorandum of Understanding, both dated 19th March, 2014 respectively. ARB.P. 497/2019 Page 1 of 3 4. Dispute and differences had arisen between the parties, pursuant to which the present petition has been filed.5. The Arbitration clauses between the p...
Devendra Kumar Singh vs.assistant Commissioner of Income Tax ,Circle 6 ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 13439/2018 DEVENDRA KUMAR SINGH ........ Petitioner Date of Decision:14. 10.2019 Through: Mr. Shashi M Kapila, Mr. Pravesh Sharma and Mr. Siddharth Kapila, Advocates. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CIRCLE621) & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Counsel Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Senior Standing with Mr.Shailindera Junior Standing Counsel. Mr. Siddharth Manocha, Advocate. Singh, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA SANJEEV NARULA, J.(Oral): CM APPL. 45126/2019 1. The prayer made in the present application is for clarification of the order dated 12.12.2018. However in substance the... Petitioner seeks the relief of stay of all reassessment proceedings pursuant to the issuance of notice under Section 148 and also the notice dated 27.09.2019 issued under Section 143 (2) of the Income Tax Act till the disposal of the writ petition. W.P. (C) 13439/2018 Page 1 of 15 2. In order to appreci...
Jamal Mohd. Khan & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14.10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4233/2019 JAMAL MOHD. KHAN & ORS. Through: ........ Petitioners... Petitioner No.1 in person versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State with ........ RESPONDENTS Inspector K.K. Mishra, SI Govind Singh, PS - Uttam Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek directions thereby quashing the FIR No.224/2010 registered at Police Station Uttam Nagar and its consequential proceedings.2. On the last date of hearing i.e. 26.09.2019, the petitioner paid an amount of 10,000/- in cash to the complainant, who was present in Court alongwith her father Mr. Faghfur Ali.3. On the said date, the petitioner had agreed to pay an amount of 20,000/- on the next date of hearing. Vide order dated 26.09.2019, complainant who was present on that day stated that her father will come on CRL.M.C.4233/2019 Page 1 of 2 the next date of heari...
Raju Kumar Gaur Alias Rajiv Prasad vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.A. 746/2015 Reserved on :07. 08.2019 Date of Decision :14. 10.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: RAJU KUMAR GAUR alias RAJIV PRASAD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Mr. Kushank Sindhu, Md. Arham Masood, Mr. Anurag Andley, Mr. Nirvikar Singh, Mr. Prince Tiwari, Mr Syed Arham, Mr. Sreedh and Ms. Kajal Thakur, Advocates. versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI ..... Respondent 1. By way of the present appeal, the appellant has assailed the Judgment dated 27.11.2014 passed by ASJ/Special Judge, Rohini Courts, Delhi in SC No.arising out of FIR No.3registered under Section 302 IPC at PS Ashok Vihar.2. Vide aforesaid Judgement, the appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 304 (Part II) of IPC and vide order on sentence dated 29.11.2014, the appellant was sentenced to RI for a period of 7 years along with payment of fine of Rs. 25,000/- a...
Ajay Jerath & Anr. Vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decison 14.10.2019 BAIL APPLN. 1998/2018 & Crl.M.A. 32295/2018 AJAY JERATH & ANR. Through: Mr. J.KI.Rana, Advocate ........ Petitioners STATE Versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Sanjay Kaushik Mr. P.P.Singh, Advocate for complainant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (ORAL) 1.... Petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No.130/2018, under SectionIPC, registered at police station Roop Nagar, Delhi.2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case, as they are only the employees of the company. In fact, the complainant is a tresspasser into the companys land and has no right, title or interest to reside therein.3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State as well learned Bail Appln. 1998/2018 Page 1 of 2 counsel for complainant have strongly opposed the ...
Ram Lakhan Sharma vs.the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
$~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5210/2019 RAM LAKHAN SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Pramod Tyagi, Adv. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State. Mr.Farahim Khan, Adv. for R-2. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl. M.A. 38046/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. Crl.M.C.5210/2019 & Crl.M.(Bail) 1791/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction to quash/ set- aside the impugned Judgment dated 04.10.2019, passed by Sh. A.K. Mendiratta, Ld. District and Session Judge, North-East, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, in C.A. Bearing No.70/2019, title as "Ram Lakhan Sharma Versus Rambeer Singh" and judgment dated 06.06.2019 and order on CRL.M.C.5210/2019 Page 1 of 4 sentence dated 28.06.2019, passed by Sh. Devender Kumar Garg, Ld. CMM, North-East, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, in complaint case ...
Aap Infrastructures Ltd. Vs.bank of Baroda and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) 10893/2019 AAP INFRASTRUCTURES LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Nikita Salwan, Adv. BANK OF BARODA AND ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Surabhi Khattar and Ms. Pragya Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL): C.M. Nos.45043/2019 & 45044/2019 1 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 10893/2019 & C.M. No.45042/2019 2 Via this writ petition, the challenge is laid to the decision of the Review Committee of respondent No.1 Bank i.e. Bank of Baroda (in short BOB) dated 18.09.2019 and communication dated 03.10.2019. 3 Mr. Sethi, learned senior counsel, who appears for the petitioner, contends that the impugned communication dated 03.10.2019 does not contain any reason. 4 Issue notice. Ms. Surabhi Khattar accepts notice on behalf of BOB. Learned counsel informs me that the reasons are contained in the minutes of mee...
- ‹ Prev
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- Next ›
- Last »