Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Red Roses Public School vs.reshmawati & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2019
$~2. * + % LPA5162019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:15. 10.2019 ..... Appellant RED ROSES PUBLIC SCHOOL Through: Mr. Kamal Gupta, Adv. versus RESHMAWATI & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA Through: Mr. Suryakant Singla with Ms. Rimjhim Naudiyal, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan with Mr. Zahid Hanief and Ms. Manisha Chauhan, Advs. for DOE. ..... Respondent VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. In the Letters Patent Appeal, the judgment dated 01.07.2019 rendered by the learned Single Judge is assailed by the appellant management. The respondent was appointed as a sweeper by the appellant school vide appointment letter dated 01.07.1989. However, her identity card described her as an Aaya.2. While she was in service, she along with several other employees had preferred a Civil Suit No.522/2011 to claim the benefits of pay and perks as admissible under the Sixth Central Pay Commission Report.3. That suit was referred to mediat...
Runa Rajput vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2019
$~10 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. h September, 2019 Date of Decision:15. h October, 2019 BAIL APPN.1865/2019 RUNA RAJPUT Through: Mr.Ramesh Gupta, ........ Petitioner Senior Advocate with Mr. Lave Kumar Sharma & Mr. Anubhav Dubey, Advocates versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, APP with SI Santosh Kumar, PS: SIU-I, Crime Branch, Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.1. The petitioner has filed the present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the order dated 27.07.2019 in Bail Application No.2278/2019 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, MACT, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in FIR No.46/18, under Sections 170/420/511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, PS: Crime Branch, Delhi, whereby the Sessions Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner.2. The case of the prosecution, as noted by the Trial Court, is as under: Bail Appn.1865...
Theme Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd vs.m/s Rail Vikas Nigam Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2019
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved:6. h April, 2018 Judgement Delivered:15 October,2019 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 66/2017 THEME ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD ... Appellant Through Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vibhor Verdhan, Mr. Yash Agarwal, Ms. Manish Mehta & Ms. Mrigna Shekhar, Advocates. versus M/S RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LTD Through Mr. J.C. Seth, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 37 (1) (b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Section 13 (1) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, directed against the order dated 21.11.2016 (impugned order) passed by a learned Single Judge in O.M.P.(COMM) No.506 of 2016, by which the Arbitral award dated 18.11.2015 and the rectified award dated 07.12.2015 passed by the sole arbitrator has been upheld and the objections to the award stand dismissed.2...
Hassad Food Company q.s.c. & Anr. Vs.bank of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:5. h September, 2019 Decided on:15. h October, 2019 I.A. 3250/2019 in CS(COMM) 9/2018 HASSAD FOOD COMPANY Q.S.C. & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Represented by: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Mr. Samar Singh Kachwaha, Ms. Smiti Verma, Mr. Aayush Marwah, Advs. versus BANK OF INDIA & ORS ..... Defendants Represented by: Mr. Adhish Rajvanshi, Ms. Shreyuss Shanbarjoshi, Ms. Kamna, Mr. V. Seshagiri, Advs. for D-1,3,5&6. Mr. Priya Mohan Roy, Adv. for D-4/ Allahabad Bank. Ms. Jagriti Ahuja, Adv. for D-7/HSBC Mr. B.L. Wali, Adv. for D-8/ Kotak Mahindra Bank. Ms. Usha Singh, Ms. Nidhi Saini, Advs. for D-9. Mr. Saumyen Das, Adv. for D-10/ DBS Bank. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.I.A. 3250/2019 (u/S151CPC for filing additional documents by P.) 1. By this application under Section 151 CPC plaintiffs seek leave to place on record additional documents.2. Plaintiffs have filed the present suit, inter alia, seeking a decree declaring that the ...
Dheeraj Arora vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision 15.10.2019 BAIL APPLN. 1191/2019 & Crl.M.A. 10123/2019 DHEERAJ ARORA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Joshi & STATE Mr. Ambareen, Advocates with petitioner in person Versus Through: Mr. G.M. Farooqui, Additional ..... Respondent Public Prosecutor for State with SI Inderpal Singh Mr. J.K. Chawla, Advocate with complainant in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J(ORAL) 1. Vide this petition, petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No.325/2017, under Sections 420/406/120B IPC, registered at police station Madhu Vihar, Delhi.2. 3.4. Notice. Ld. APP for the State accepts notice. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of dispute has been amicably resolved between the parties and complete payment has been made to the complainant. BAIL APPLN. 1191/2019 Page 1 of 2 5. The aforesaid stand taken on behalf of petitioner is affirmed by counsel for compla...
Dr. Shivam Chugh vs.national Board of Examinations & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on 17.09.2019 Judgment pronounced on 15.10.2019 + W.P. (C) 6796/2019 & C.M. No.28445/2019 DR. SHIVAM CHUGH ....... Petitioner Through Mr. R.K. Saini, Mr. Ankit Singh, and Ms. Bhavana Jain, Advs. Versus NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS & ORS. ...... RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Prateek Dhanda, and Mr.Rohan Anand, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Sarvan Kumar Shukla, Adv for UOI/R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.: Preface: This is a petition which is directed against communication dated 04.06.2019 (hereafter referred to as impugned communication) whereby the National Board of Examinations (NBE) intimated to the petitioner that the seat allotted to him for January 2019 admission session had been forfeited on account of his failure to produce original certificates during the certificate verification process. This communication went on to sta...
Babita Jain vs.meena Devi @ Meena Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * % Reserved on:30. h September, 2019 Decided on :15. h October, 2019 + RFA3462019& CM APPL Nos.18268, 32760 of 2019 BABITA JAIN ..... Appellant MEENA DEVI @ MEENA JAIN ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, Mr.Manish Jain, Through : Mr.R.K.Jain, Advocate. versus Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This appeal is preferred by the appellant/defendant against the judgment and decree dated 08.02.2019 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-3/North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred as the learned Trial Court) in CS No.1506/2016 whereby the suit of the respondent/plaintiff for possession, permanent injunction, and damages/ mesne profits was decreed in favour of respondent.2. The brief facts which culminated into filing of this appeal, as alleged by the appellant are the respondent had filed this suit on the premise she is an owner of ground and first floor, admeasuring 75 square yard...
Puran Lal Tewatia vs.govt. Of Nct Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2019
Date of Decision:15. 10.2019 .....Petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~6 * + W.P.(C) 10209/2019 & CM APPL. 42092-42094/2019 PURAN LAL TEWATIA GOVT. OF NCT DELHI AND ORS. Through: Mr.J.S.Mann, Advocate. versus .....Respondents Through: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr.N.K.Singh, Ms.Palak and Ms.Laveena Arora, advocates for respondent-GNCTD. Rohmetra CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) Decision dated 18.03.2019 rendered by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) has led to the filing of this writ petition. Learned counsel for the respondent enters appearance on advance copy. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set- down for final hearing and disposal at the admission stage itself.2. The petitioner was working as Vice Principal, Govt. Boys. Sr. W.P.(C) 10209/2019 page 1 of 7 Secondary School No.1, Khanpur, New Delhi. He superannuated on 28.02.2018. Relying on Policy ...
Havells India Limited vs.rajeev Chawla
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:15. h October, 2019 CS(COMM) 176/2019 HAVELLS INDIA LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Represented by: Ms. Prachi Agarwal, Ms. Ridhie Bajaj, versus RAJEEV CHAWLA Represented by: Advs. Ex-parte ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) I.A. 9915/2019 (u/O VI R. 15A r/w O. VIII R110 CPC by P) 1. By this application under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC plaintiff prays that the right of the defendant to file the written statement be closed.2. Written statement by the defendant was not filed in time. The application under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC has not been pursued and was dismissed for non-prosecution on 10th October, 2019.3. Hence, this application is allowed and the right of the defendant to file the written statement is closed. CS(COMM) 176/2019 1. For the last two dates none has been appearing on behalf of the defendant. The right of the defendant to file written statement has also been closed.2.3. Defendant is pro...
Bansal Infratech Synergies Limited vs.gail India Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. h October, 2019 $~21 * % + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 409/2019 BANSAL INFRATECH SYNERGIES LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Divyakant Lahoti and Mr. Hussain Ali, Advocate. versus GAIL INDIA LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rishi Raj, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.14249/2019 (Exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 409/2019 1. Issue notice 2. Mr. Raj, learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice.3. This is a petition under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for completion of Arbitral Proceedings and passing of Award. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 409/2019 Page 1 of 2 4. Disputes having been arisen between the parties with respect to the Civil and Structural Works-II (offsites) for Gail Petrochemical Complex-II, Pata (U.P.). The arbitrator was appointed by this Court vide order dated 16th ...
- ‹ Prev
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- Next ›
- Last »