Dheeraj Arora vs.state

Dheeraj Arora vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 15, 2019

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1225979

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1225979
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Oct 15, 2019
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dheeraj Arora

Advocate Mr. Siddharth Joshi, Mr. Ambareen

Respondent

State

Advocate Mr. G.M. Farooqui, Mr. J.K. Chawla

Excerpt

$~ * % + in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of decision 15.10.2019 bail appln. 1191/2019 & crl.m.a. 10123/2019 dheeraj arora ........ petitioner through: mr. siddharth joshi & state mr. ambareen, advocates with petitioner in person versus through: mr. g.m. farooqui, additional ..... respondent public prosecutor for state with si inderpal singh mr. j.k. chawla, advocate with complainant in person coram: hon'ble mr. justice brijesh sethi judgment brijesh sethi, j(oral) 1. vide this petition, petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in fir no.325/2017, under sections 420/406/120b ipc, registered at police station madhu vihar, delhi.2. 3.4. notice. ld. app for the state accepts notice. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of dispute has been amicably resolved between the parties and complete payment has been made to the complainant. bail appln. 1191/2019 page 1 of 2 5. the aforesaid stand taken on behalf of petitioner is affirmed by counsel for complainant.6. in view of the above, in the event of arrest, the petitioner be admitted to bail, subject to his furnishing a bail bond in the sum of rs.25,000/- with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of investigating officer/arresting officer.7. with aforesaid directions, this petition is disposed of. brijesh sethi, j october15 2019 r bail appln. 1191/2019 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision 15.10.2019 BAIL APPLN. 1191/2019 & Crl.M.A. 10123/2019 DHEERAJ ARORA ........ Petitioner

Through: Mr. Siddharth Joshi & STATE Mr. Ambareen, Advocates with petitioner in person Versus Through: Mr. G.M. Farooqui, Additional ..... Respondent Public Prosecutor for State with SI Inderpal Singh Mr. J.K. Chawla, Advocate with complainant in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J(ORAL) 1. Vide this petition, petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No.325/2017, under Sections 420/406/120B IPC, registered at police station Madhu Vihar, Delhi.

2. 3.

4. Notice. Ld. APP for the State accepts notice. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of dispute has been amicably resolved between the parties and complete payment has been made to the complainant. BAIL APPLN. 1191/2019 Page 1 of 2 5. The aforesaid stand taken on behalf of petitioner is affirmed by counsel for complainant.

6. In view of the above, in the event of arrest, the petitioner be admitted to bail, subject to his furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer.

7. With aforesaid directions, this petition is disposed of. BRIJESH SETHI, J OCTOBER15 2019 r BAIL APPLN. 1191/2019 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2019 Same Parties Dheeraj Arora vs State Same Subject Criminal