Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rishabh Jaiswal & Anr vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2019
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5559/2019 RISHABH JAISWAL & ANR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.S.S. Drall, Adv. versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.K.K. Ghei, APP for State. SI Reema PS Janakpuri. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No.668/2016 dated 25.01.2016, registered at PS Janakpuri, for the offences punishable under Sections 354D/120B/34 IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal. CRL.M.C. Page 1 of 2 4. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent No.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.5. Respond...
Prateek Singhal vs.national Testing Agency, Department of High Educati ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA5752019 IN THE MATTER OF: PRATEEK SINGHAL Reserved on:17. 10.2019 Date of decision:31. 10.2019 Through : Mr. R.M. Sinha and Mr. P.M. Sinha, Advocates. ..... Appellant versus NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGH EDUCATION MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Amit Bansal, Standing Counsel with Ms. Seema Dolo and Ms. Vipasha Mishra, Advocates, for respondent No.1. Mr. Arjun Mitra and Ms. Jaskaran Kaur, Advocates, for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The appellant, petitioner in W.P. (C) 8307/2019, is aggrieved by the judgment dated 19.8.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge, declining to quash the Business Rules issued by the respondent No.2/Joint Seat Allocation Authority (JoSAA), released on 16.6.2019 or set aside the cancellation letter dated 1.7.2019, issued by the respondent No.2/JoSAA informing him that the seat allo...
Sushil Sisodia & Anr. Vs.the State of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: October 31, 2019 + W.P.(CRL) 3062/2019 SUSHIL SISODIA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Mahendra Singh, Advocates alongwith petitioners in person THE STATE OF DELHI & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sanajy Lao, ASC with Mr. Karanjeet Sharma, Advocate with SI Amrender, P.S.: Fatehpur Beri CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral) CRL.M.A. 39344/2019 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(CRL) 3062/2019 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking protection from respondent no.3/father of the petitioner no.2.2. Notice. W.P.(Crl.) 3062/2019 Page 1 of 2 3. Learned ASC accepts notice and states that the address of the petitioners could not be verified.4. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners are residing at the given address as given in the memo of parties.5. Learned ASC states ...
Ishwer Singh vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2019
$~13, 14 and 15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15th October, 2019 Pronounced on:31st October, 2019 W.P.(C) 4115/2014 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC with Mr. Srivats Kaushal, Advocates. versus ASSOCIATION OF THE EMPLOYEES OF INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MASS COMMUNICATION (REGD.) AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jayant K. Mehta and Mr. Shaurya Kuthiala, Advocates. W.P.(C) 359/2017 AND C.M. APPL. 10453/2019 (delay) UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra and Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocates. versus PRADEEP MATHUR AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate. + + + W.P.(C) 4599/2019 and C.M. APPL. 20458/2019 ISHWER SINGH ..... Appellant UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through: Mr. Vishwendra Verma, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul and Ms. Arti Bansal, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH W.P.(C) 4115/2014 and connected matter...
Pappu Mal & Anr. Vs.anita Arora
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2019
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:31. 10.2019 RC.REV. 417/2015 & CM APPL. 14656/2015 PAPPU MAL & ANR ANITA ARORA versus ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr.G.S.Sharma, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr.Vikas Mehta, Mr.Rajat Sehgal and Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 07.07.2015, whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioner was dismissed and an eviction order was passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from shop bearing No.4085, Nai Sarak, Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to the eviction petition. RC.REV.417/2015 Page 1 of 3 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner under inst...
Union of India and Anr. Vs.association of the Employees of Indian Inst ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2019
$~13, 14 and 15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15th October, 2019 Pronounced on:31st October, 2019 W.P.(C) 4115/2014 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC with Mr. Srivats Kaushal, Advocates. versus ASSOCIATION OF THE EMPLOYEES OF INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MASS COMMUNICATION (REGD.) AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jayant K. Mehta and Mr. Shaurya Kuthiala, Advocates. W.P.(C) 359/2017 AND C.M. APPL. 10453/2019 (delay) UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra and Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocates. versus PRADEEP MATHUR AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate. + + + W.P.(C) 4599/2019 and C.M. APPL. 20458/2019 ISHWER SINGH ..... Appellant UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through: Mr. Vishwendra Verma, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul and Ms. Arti Bansal, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH W.P.(C) 4115/2014 and connected matter...
Praveer Chandra vs.aprajita & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2019
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t October, 2019 + CM (M) 452/2019 & CM APPL. 12663/2019 PRAVEER CHANDRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ranjit Sharma, Advocate. versus (M:9818493174) APRAJITA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S. K. Bhattacharya, Mr. Sushil and Mr. Suresh Bharti, Kalra Advocates for R-1. (M:9213107534) Mr. Binay K. Das and Ms. Priyanka Das, Advocates for R-2 & 3. (M:9868888234) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition challenges the impugned order dated 25th April, 2018 by which the... Petitioners application under Section 10 CPC seeking stay of the partition suit has been dismissed.2. The brief background is that the testatrix - Late Smt. Shanti Singh had executed an alleged Will dated 17th May, 2009. The... Petitioner/Defendant No.6 (hereinafter Defendant No.6) filed probate petition no.46/2011 under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 before the Civil Judge, Motihari, Bihar. The said p...
Om Prakash Puri vs.anita Arora
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2019
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CM(M) 602/2015 OM PRAKASH PURI ANITA ARORA Judgment delivered on:31. 10.2019 versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr.P.P.Ahuja and Mr.J.S.Kohli, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr.Vikas Mehta, Mr.Rajat Sehgal and Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner/Tenant impugns order dated 04.06.2015, whereby the applications filed by the petitioner to place on record additional facts and documents was dismissed by the Rent Controller.2. Subsequently, by order dated 07.07.2015, the leave to defend application was dismissed and an eviction order passed which was challenged by the petitioner in RC.REV.348/2015.3. By an order of todays date, petitioner has withdrawn CM(M) 602/2015 Page 1 of 2 RC.REV.348/2015 and undertaken to vacate and hand over the physical vacant possession of the tenanted prem...
Patnam Azeez vs.medical Council of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~34 * % + W.P.(C) 3583/2018 PATNAM AZEEZ versus Decision of Date:31. 10.2019 ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Anushruti, Adv. MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR. ...... RESPONDENTS Through Mr. T. Singhdev with Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty, Ms. Michelle B. Das, Ms. Puja Sarkar, Ms. Arunima Pal, Mr. Tarun Verma and Ms. Sumangla, Advs.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) CM No.4193/2019 This is an application for taking the accompanying rejoinder on record.2. For the reasons given in the application, the prayer is allowed. The rejoinder is formally taken on record.3. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) No.3583/2018 4. The substantive prayers made in the petition are as follows: A. Issue a Writ, Order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing/ setting aside the impugned W.P.(C) 3583/2018 Pg. 1 of 5 order dated 21.04.2017 passed by the Respondent and annexed to this writ petition as Annexure P-1; B. Issue ...
Kashish Jain vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:17. 09.2019 Judgment pronounced on:31. 10.2019 + BAIL APPLN. 1131/2019 KASHISH JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Parag Chawla, THE STATE Mr. Vineet Chadha and Mr. Pavit Singh, Advs. versus (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr Tarang Srivastava, APP for State. SI Pradeep Kumar, PS Model Town. Ms. Aakanksha Bansal, Advs. for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J.1. Vide this order I shall dispose of the bail application filed by the petitioner Kashish Jain under section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in FIR No.341/2018, PS Model Town u/s. 420/467/468/4IPC.2. Brief facts necessary for disposal of the bail application are that complainant Sanjay Garg had given first floor of his property bearing No.Z-10, Model Town on rent to co-accused Naresh Jain and Simi Jain who are parents of applicant vide rent agreement dated 24.01.2013. Thereafter both parties develope...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »