Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rishabh Jaiswal & Anr vs.the State & Anr

Rishabh Jaiswal & Anr vs The State & Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 31, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1226378

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rishabh Jaiswal & Anr

Respondent

The State & Anr

Excerpt

$~49 * in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of decision:31. 10.2019 + crl.m.c. 5559/2019 rishabh jaiswal & anr ........ petitioner through mr.s.s. drall, adv. versus the state & anr ........ respondents through mr.k.k. ghei, app for state. si reema ps janakpuri. respondent no.2 in person. coram: hon'ble mr. justice suresh kumar kait judgment (oral) 1. vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing fir no.668/2016 dated 25.01.2016, registered at ps - janakpuri, for the offences punishable under sections 354d/120b/34 ipc and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. 3. notice issued. notice is accepted by learned app for the state and respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal. crl.m.c. page 1 of 2 4. the present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent no.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.5. respondent no.2 is personally present in court and she has been identified by si reema/io and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.6. the petitioners and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement deed dated 16.10.2019.7. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the concerned fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.8. for the reasons afore-recorded, the fir no.668/2016 dated 25.01.2016, registered at ps - janakpuri, for the offences punishable under sections 354d/120b/34 ipc and consequent proceedings therefrom are quashed.9. the petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.10. dasti. (suresh kumar kait) judge october31 2019/ab crl.m.c. page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:

31. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5559/2019 RISHABH JAISWAL & ANR ........ Petitioner

Through Mr.S.S. Drall, Adv. versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS

Through Mr.K.K. Ghei, APP for State. SI Reema PS Janakpuri. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT

(ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No.668/2016 dated 25.01.2016, registered at PS - Janakpuri, for the offences punishable under Sections 354D/120B/34 IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal. CRL.M.C. Page 1 of 2 4. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent No.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.

5. Respondent No.2 is personally present in Court and she has been identified by SI Reema/IO and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

6. The petitioners and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement deed dated 16.10.2019.

7. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.

8. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.668/2016 dated 25.01.2016, registered at PS - Janakpuri, for the offences punishable under Sections 354D/120B/34 IPC and consequent proceedings therefrom are quashed.

9. The petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

10. Dasti. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE OCTOBER31 2019/ab CRL.M.C. Page 2 of 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial