Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sunil Kumar & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: October 21, 2019 + W.P.(CRL) 2984/2019 & Crl.M.A. 38749/2019 SUNIL KUMAR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Dalip Kumar Santoshi, Advocate STATE & ANR. versus Through Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC for the ........ RESPONDENTS State with W/SI Chanchal Sharma and SI Sanjay, P.S.: Mayur Vihar Respondent no.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral) 1. Quashing of FIR No.0344/2017, under Sections 498A/4IPC, registered at police station Mayur Vihar PH-I, Delhi is sought on the ground that the dispute between the parties stands amicably settled. Respondent no.2 is present in the court today and submits that he has settled the dispute with the petitioners without any undue influence, coercion or pressure from any source whatsoever.2. Notice.3. Ms. Kamna Vohra, learned ASC for the respondent/State accepts notice and submits that petitioners as well as respondent No.2/ W.P.(Crl.) 2984/2019 Page 1 ...
Shri Sudhir Rana vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~13 * + W.P.(C) 4980/2019 & CM APPL. 38191/2019 Date of Decision:21. 10.2019 SHRI SUDHIR RANA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Sachin Chauhan, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel for GNCTD (services) with Mr.Nitesh Kumar Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. No.38191/2019 (delay in filing short affidavit) For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay of 20 days in filing the short affidavit is condoned. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) No.4980/2019 Pursuant to a recruitment advertisement issued in the year 2013 for the post of Constable (Ex) in Delhi Police, the petitioner applied for the said post against the W.P.(C) No.4980/2019 page 1 of 5 Unreserved category. The petitioner also sought benefits of column 12(a) and (b) of the recruitment instr...
Satish & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: October 21, 2019 + W.P.(CRL) 2269/2019 & Crl.M.A. 33541/2019 SATISH & ORS. STATE & ANR. Advocates alongwith petitioners in person Through Mr. Vijay Kinger, Ms. Shivani, versus Through Mr. G.M. Farooqui, APP for Mr. ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners R.S. Kundu, ASC with SI Rajeshwar, P.S.:Seema Puri and SI Parmod Kumar,P.S.: Shahdara Respondent no.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral) 1. Quashing of FIR No.328/2016, under Sections 498A/4IPC, registered at police station Shahdara, Delhi is sought on the ground that the dispute between the parties stands amicably settled. Respondent no.2 is present in the court today and submits that he has settled the dispute with the petitioners without any undue influence, coercion or pressure from any source whatsoever.2. Notice.3. Mr. G.M. Farooqui, learned APP for the respondent/State accepts notice and submits that petitioners as well...
Ranvir Singh vs.rajinder Kumar Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2019
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 10.2019 RC.REV. 68/2016 & CM APPL. 4154/2016 & 23501/2016 RANVIR SINGH versus RAJINDER KUMAR JAIN ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Kshitij Mudgal, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Satya Priya Kamrah, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 01.12.2015 whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent on bonafide necessity under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act seeking eviction of the petitioner from one room measuring 9 feet x 10 feet besides bathroom on the first floor in property No.1878, Gali No.2 & 3, Kailash Nagar, Gandhi Nagar, Delhi-110031. RC.REV.68/2016 Page 1 of 6 3. Subject eviction pe...
Mihir Sattavan vs.university of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2019
$~87 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:18. 10.2019 W.P.(C) 9059/2019 & CM No.45761/2019 MIHIR SATTAVAN ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Rajeev Sharma and Mr. Atal Tyagi, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal and Mr. Kausik Ghosh, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Rajesh Gogna and Mr. Upendra Sai, Advs. for R-2/Hansraj College. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER (ORAL): CM No.45761/2019 1. This is an application filed on behalf of respondent no.2 college i.e. Hans Raj College for seeking condonation of delay in filing the counter affidavit.2. According to learned counsel for respondent no.2 college, there is a delay of 31 days.3. 4.5. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned. The counter affidavit of respondent no.2 college is taken on record. The captioned application is disposed of. W.P.(C)No.9059/2019 Pg.1 of 10 W.P.(C) 9059/2019 Background...
Ilyasuddin vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. 10.2019 * % + W.P.(CRL) 2274/2019 ILYASUDDIN Through: Mr. Saurabh Soni, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R.S.Kundu, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Brahm Prakash JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (ORAL) 1.... Petitioners prayer seeking first spell of furlough for three weeks has been declined by the concerned authorities vide order of 6th June, 2019 with the observation that his presence is highly dangerous to public peace and tranquility and he may jump furlough. Quashing of aforesaid order of 6th June, 2019 and furlough for three weeks is sought by petitioner vide this petition.2. Notice.3. Mr. R.S.Kundu, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State, accepts notice and opposes this petition.4. Learned counsel for petitioner states that the order passed by the concerned Inspector General of Police is purely based on presumptions W.P.(Crl...
Maharaja Agrasain College of Education vs.national Council for Teacher ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2019
$~1 to 3 & 10 to 70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:18. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) 8820/2019 SIR CHHOTU RAM JAT COLLEGE OF EDUCATION NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 8821/2019 SITA RAM ARYA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION versus ........ Petitioner NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 8828/2019 SIR CHHOTU RAM JAT COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ........ Petitioner NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. versus ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 5667/2019 LT MAHIPAT SINGH COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ........ Petitioner NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. ..... Respondent versus + W.P.(C) 6221/2019 MAHARAJA AGRASAIN COLLEGE OF EDUCATION NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR versus W.P.(C)No.8820/2019 & connected matters ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Pg.1 of 17 + W.P.(C) 6224/2019 AAKASH COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ........ Petitioner NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & AN...
Inderprastha College of Education vs.national Council for Teacher Educ ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2019
$~1 to 3 & 10 to 70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:18. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) 8820/2019 SIR CHHOTU RAM JAT COLLEGE OF EDUCATION NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 8821/2019 SITA RAM ARYA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION versus ........ Petitioner NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 8828/2019 SIR CHHOTU RAM JAT COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ........ Petitioner NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. versus ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 5667/2019 LT MAHIPAT SINGH COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ........ Petitioner NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. ..... Respondent versus + W.P.(C) 6221/2019 MAHARAJA AGRASAIN COLLEGE OF EDUCATION NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR versus W.P.(C)No.8820/2019 & connected matters ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Pg.1 of 17 + W.P.(C) 6224/2019 AAKASH COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ........ Petitioner NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & AN...
Make My Trip (India) Private Limited vs.make My Travel (India) Private ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h July, 2019 Pronounced on:18. h October, 2019 CS(COMM) 889/2018, I.As. 6896/2018 & 8837/2018 + MAKE MY TRIP (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. J.Sai Deepak, Mr. Mohit Goel, Mr. P.D.U. Srikar and Mr. Abhishek, Advocates. versus MAKE MY TRAVEL (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J I.A No.6896/2018 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 And 2, CPC) & IA No.8837/2018 (under Order XXXIX Rule 4, CPC) 1. Plaintiff by way of the present suit inter alia seeks permanent injunction restraining the Defendant from adopting and using (A) the trade mark/trade name 'Make My Travel' (word per se), MMT (letter mark) and the tag line 'Dreams Unlimited' (hereinafter, the "Impugned WordMarks"); (B) the MakeMyTravel Logo, i.e., which includes the Infringing Word Marks, namely, MMT and Dreams Unlimited (hereinafter, the CS(COMM) 889/2018 Page 1 of ...
Divyam College of Education vs.national Council for Teacher Education ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2019
$~1 to 3 & 10 to 70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:18. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) 8820/2019 SIR CHHOTU RAM JAT COLLEGE OF EDUCATION NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 8821/2019 SITA RAM ARYA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION versus ........ Petitioner NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 8828/2019 SIR CHHOTU RAM JAT COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ........ Petitioner NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. versus ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 5667/2019 LT MAHIPAT SINGH COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ........ Petitioner NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. ..... Respondent versus + W.P.(C) 6221/2019 MAHARAJA AGRASAIN COLLEGE OF EDUCATION NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR versus W.P.(C)No.8820/2019 & connected matters ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Pg.1 of 17 + W.P.(C) 6224/2019 AAKASH COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ........ Petitioner NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & AN...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »