Sunil Kumar & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.

Sunil Kumar & Ors. vs State & Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 21, 2019

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1226177

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1226177
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Oct 21, 2019
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sunil Kumar & Ors.

Respondent

State & Anr.

Excerpt

.....vohra, asc for the ........ respondents state with w/si chanchal sharma and si sanjay, p.s.: mayur vihar respondent no.2 in person coram: hon'ble mr. justice brijesh sethi judgment brijesh sethi, j (oral) 1. quashing of fir no.0344/2017, under sections 498a/4ipc, registered at police station mayur vihar ph-i, delhi is sought on the ground that the dispute between the parties stands amicably settled. respondent no.2 is present in the court today and submits that he has settled the dispute with the petitioners without any undue influence, coercion or pressure from any source whatsoever.2. notice.3. ms. kamna vohra, learned asc for the respondent/state accepts notice and submits that petitioners as well as respondent no.2/ w.p.(crl.) 2984/2019 page 1 of 2 complainant of this fir, who are present in the court have been duly identified by the investigating officer of this case.4. the petitioners and respondent no.2 have submitted that they have settled their disputes vide settlement deed dated 09.05.2018. the parties have already obtained divorce by mutual consent on 23.01.2019. the settlement amount was rs. 9,00,000/-, out of which rs. 5,00,000/- has been paid to respondent no.2 at the time of first motion and rs. 2,00,000/- has further been paid to respondent no.2 at the time of second motion and a demand draft of rs. 2,00,000/- has been handed over to respondent no.2 today in the court. copy of the said demand draft has been placed on record.5. respondent no.2, present in the court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved. respondent no.2 further submits that now no dispute with petitioners survives and therefore, the proceedings arising out of the fir in question be brought to an end.6. since the dispute stands amicably resolved between the parties, the petition is allowed and fir no.0344/2017, under sections 498a/4ipc, registered at police station mayur vihar ph-i, delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed qua.....

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: October 21, 2019 + W.P.(CRL) 2984/2019 & Crl.M.A. 38749/2019 SUNIL KUMAR & ORS. ........ Petitioner

s Through Mr. Dalip Kumar Santoshi, Advocate STATE & ANR. versus Through Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC for the ........ RESPONDENTS

State with W/SI Chanchal Sharma and SI Sanjay, P.S.: Mayur Vihar Respondent no.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral) 1. Quashing of FIR No.0344/2017, under Sections 498A/4
IPC, registered at police station Mayur Vihar PH-I, Delhi is sought on the ground that the dispute between the parties stands amicably settled. Respondent no.2 is present in the court today and submits that he has settled the dispute with the petitioners without any undue influence, coercion or pressure from any source whatsoever.

2. Notice.

3. Ms. Kamna Vohra, learned ASC for the respondent/State accepts notice and submits that petitioners as well as respondent No.2/ W.P.(Crl.) 2984/2019 Page 1 of 2 complainant of this FIR, who are present in the Court have been duly identified by the Investigating Officer of this case.

4. The petitioners and respondent no.2 have submitted that they have settled their disputes vide Settlement Deed dated 09.05.2018. The parties have already obtained divorce by mutual consent on 23.01.2019. The settlement amount was Rs. 9,00,000/-, out of which Rs. 5,00,000/- has been paid to respondent no.2 at the time of first motion and Rs. 2,00,000/- has further been paid to respondent no.2 at the time of second motion and a demand draft of Rs. 2,00,000/- has been handed over to respondent no.2 today in the court. Copy of the said demand draft has been placed on record.

5. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved. Respondent No.2 further submits that now no dispute with petitioners survives and therefore, the proceedings arising out of the FIR in question be brought to an end.

6. Since the dispute stands amicably resolved between the parties, the petition is allowed and FIR No.0344/2017, under Sections 498A/4
IPC, registered at police station Mayur Vihar PH-I, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed qua petitioners.

7. The petition stands disposed of. The other pending application also stands disposed of. OCROBER21 2019/savita (BRIJESH SETHI) JUDGE W.P.(Crl.) 2984/2019 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2019 Same Parties Sunil Kumar & Ors. vs State & Anr. Same Subject Education