Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Chaman & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.

Chaman & Anr. vs State & Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 23, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1226265

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chaman & Anr.

Advocate Mr. Jyoti Gupta

Respondent

State & Anr.

Advocate Mr. Deepak Pathak

Excerpt

$~65 * in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of decision:23. 10.2019 + crl.m.c. 5486/2019 chaman & anr. ........ petitioners through: mr. jyoti gupta, adv. versus state & anr. through: mr.tarang shrivastava, app for state ........ respondents si bansi lal, hc manoj kumar, ps k.m. pur mr. deepak pathak, adv. for r-2- bses coram: hon'ble mr. justice suresh kumar kait judgment (oral) crl. m.a. 39061/2019 1.2. allowed, subject to all just exceptions. application is disposed of. crl.m.c. 5486/2019 3. vide the present petition, the petitioners seeks direction thereby quashing fir no.0441/2018 dated 25.12.2018, registered at ps k.m. pur for the offences punishable under section 135 of the electricity act, 2003 and all other proceedings emanating therefrom. crl.m.c. 5486/2019 page 1 of 2 4.5. notice issued. notice is accepted by learned app for the state and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. the present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent no.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.7. since the settlement amount has been paid by the petitioner to respondent no.2 and respondent no.2 has issued a no objection certificate, therefore, this court is inclined to quash the concerned fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.8. for the reasons afore-recorded, the fir no.0441/2018 dated 25.12.2018, registered at ps k.m. pur instituted for the offences punishable under section 135 of the electricity act, 2003 and consequent proceedings therefrom are quashed.9. the petition is allowed accordingly.10. dasti. (suresh kumar kait) judge october23 2019 ms crl.m.c. 5486/2019 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:

23. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5486/2019 CHAMAN & ANR. ........ Petitioner

s Through: Mr. Jyoti Gupta, Adv. versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr.Tarang Shrivastava, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS

SI Bansi Lal, HC Manoj Kumar, PS K.M. Pur Mr. Deepak Pathak, Adv. for R-2- BSES CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT

(ORAL) CRL. M.A. 39061/2019 1.

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5486/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.0441/2018 dated 25.12.2018, registered at PS K.M. Pur for the offences punishable under Section 135 of The Electricity Act, 2003 and all other proceedings emanating therefrom. CRL.M.C. 5486/2019 Page 1 of 2 4.

5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent no.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.

7. Since the settlement amount has been paid by the petitioner to respondent no.2 and respondent no.2 has issued a no objection certificate, therefore, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.

8. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.0441/2018 dated 25.12.2018, registered at PS K.M. Pur instituted for the offences punishable under Section 135 of The Electricity Act, 2003 and consequent proceedings therefrom are quashed.

9. The petition is allowed accordingly.

10. Dasti. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE OCTOBER23 2019 ms CRL.M.C. 5486/2019 Page 2 of 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial