Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sunil Kumar Aledia vs.delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) 11702/2018 & CM APPL. 45289/20 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Bibhuti Bhushan Mishra, Adv. SUNIL KUMAR ALEDIA DELHI URBAN SHELTER IMPROVEMENT BOARD AND ORS. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Standing Counsel with Mr. Nitin Jain, Adv. for DUSIB. Mr. Prateek K. Chadha, Adv. for respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral) CM APPL. 45289/2018 (exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 11702/2018 1. Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that suffice would it be for the disposal of this writ petition if a suitable direction is given to the respondents that the night shelter home pointed out in this writ petition at Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi may not be used for election purpose in future.2. Having heard counsels for the parties and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case it appear...
Arun Khanna vs.the Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fu ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :-"24.10.2019 + W.P.(C) 3855/2014 ARUN KHANNA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Deepak Tyagi, Adv. versus THE PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, REGIONAL OFFICE AND ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajesh Manchanda & Mr.Rajat Manchanda, Advs. for RPFC. Mr.Siddhartha Shankar Ray with Mr.Varun Nischal, Advs. for applicant Mr.Pradeep Gupta with applicant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) C.M. No.27793/2019 (for modification of order dated 07.04.2016) 1. This is an application filed by one Mr.Pradeep Gupta, an ex- employee of M/s. A.V. Engineering Pvt. Ltd. seeking modification of the order dated 07.04.2016 passed by this Court. Under the said order, this Court had directed that the amount realised by the respondent no.1 from the petitioner by way of attachment be not WP (C) No.3855 /2014 Page 1 of 6 disbursed without further orders of the Court in this regard...
Krishan Kumar vs.taruna Rani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 10.2019 RC.REV. 249/2019 & CM APPL. 19209/2019 KRISHAN KUMAR TARUNA RANI versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Vikram Nandrajog, Advocate with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Satish Sharma, Advocate with respondent in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 07.12.2018, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from one shop on ground floor of property bearing No.K-69, Krishna Nagar, Delhi - 110051, more particularly as shown in black colour in the site plan RC.REV.249/2019 Page 1 of...
Birender Sangwan vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5859/2017 BIRENDER SANGWAN Through: None ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mrs. Suparna Srivastava, CGSC with Mr. Tushar Mathur and Ms. Nehul Sharma, Advs. for R-1 Ms. Dacchita Shahi for Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC- GNCTD Mr. Rajiv Kapur, Ms. Khushboo Kapur and Mr. Sourav Singh Tomar, Advs. for R-SBI SI Ram Tirath, Pairvi Officer- Traffic CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER2410.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) W.P.(C) 5859/2017 1. When the matter is called out, nobody appears for the petitioner.2. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the respondents who have submitted that, in pursuance of a circular dated 1st August, 2019 issued by Deputy Commissioner of Police, Traffic (HQ): Delhi, now e- payment is brought into operation. E-challans have also been brought W.P.(C) 5859/2017 Page 1 of 2 into operation ...
Masyc Projects Pvt Ltd vs.nilachal Iron and Power Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
$~8 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Delivered on :24. h October, 2019 + RFA3132018 MASYC PROJECTS PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Tarun Sharma, Ms.Akanksha Kapoor and Mr.Pradeep Singh, Advocates. versus NILACHAL IRON AND POWER LTD ..... Respondent and Through : Mr.Gaurav Kejriwal Mr.Gurpreet Hora, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This appeal is preferred by the appellant against the judgment and decree dated 19.12.2017 passed by the learned Additional District Judge- 06/West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred as the learned Trial Court) in CS No.11280/2016 whereby the suit filed by appellant for recovery of Rs.20,37,506/- was dismissed, primarily, on grounds of territorial jurisdiction.2. The brief facts which led to the filing of the suit, as are noted in impugned judgment are as under:-"1. xxxxxxxxx the plaintiff company is engaged in manufacture of material handling equipments like belt, conveyors, conveying a...
Rashmi Nagia vs.guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University Through the ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
$~58 & 59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:21. t October, 2019 Pronounced on:24. h October, 2019 + LPA5562019 and CM Nos. 38874/2019, 38876/2019, 39533/2019 TANYA MANN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.K. Rungta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. J.S. Mann, Mr. Vipul Kr. Upadhyay, Mr. Prashant, Mr.C.S.S. Pillai, Advs. versus REGISTRAR , GURU GOVIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Anita Sahani, Adv. for R-1 Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, ASC- GNCTD with Mr. Rahul Jain, Adv. for R-2 and 6 Ms. Priya Barva for Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Adv. for R- 3/NDMC Mr. Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar and Mr. Atul Bharti, Advs. for R-5 Mr. R.K. Saini and Mr. Ankit Singh, Adv. for R-7 + W.P.(C) 9605/2019 RASHMI NAGIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Saini and Mr. Ankit Singh, Advs. LPA5562019 & W.P. (C) 9605/2019 Page 1 of 19 versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY THROUGH THE REGISTRAR (ADMISSIONS) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Anita Sahani, Adv. for R-1 Ms....
Subhash Chand vs.taruna Rani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 10.2019 RC.REV. 239/2019 & CM APPL. 18391/2019 SUBHASH CHAND TARUNA RANI versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Vikram Nandrajog, Advocate with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Satish Sharma, Advocate with respondent in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 07.12.2018, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from one shop on ground floor of property bearing No.K-69, Krishna Nagar, Delhi - 110051, more particularly as shown in yellow colour in the site plan RC.REV.239/2019 Page 1 o...
Jai Dutta @ Jai Kishan & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5506/2019 JAI DUTTA @ JAI KISHAN & ORS. ........ Petitioner Through Mr. G.B. Garg with Mr. Manish Kumar, Advs. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State Ms. Pooja Gupta, Adv. for R-2 SI Rawat Singh, PS Tilak Nagar ASI Sunil Kumar, PS Khayala JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl. M.A. 39152/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5506/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.0240/2016 dated 25.05.2016 registered at Police Station Khyala and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C. 5506/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent n...
Raja Ram vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7307/2012 & CM APPLs. 2076/2013 & 5/2014 Date of decision:24. 10.2019 RAJA RAM ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Kumar Rawal with Mr. Ram Kumar, and Mr. Aditya Awasthi, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing counsel with Ms. Gauri Chaturvedi, and Mr. Paritosh Dhawan, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL):1. This is a writ petition via which the petitioner effectively seeks allotment of an alternate plot in a specific area described as Sector- 18, Pocket 3, Block-H, Rohini, New Delhi.2. The record shows that the petitioner had sought amendment of the writ petition which was allowed by this Court vide order dated 22.12.2015. This order was passed in CM No.1081/2014.3. Therefore, what is required to be noticed are the prayers made in the amended writ petition. 3.1 These prayers read as follows:-"" i. To direct respondent to allo...
Sunil vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:24. h October, 2019 + CRL. A. 733/2017 SACHIN Through: Mr.Arun Sharma, Advocate. ...Appellant Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI)... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr.Ravi Nayak APP for State. + CRL. A. 996/2017 SUNIL Through: Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Ms.Shefali Vats, Advocate. ...Appellant Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI)... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr. Ravi Nayak APP for State. + CRL. A. 623/2017 PRABHA ...Appellant Through: Mr.Joginder Tuli, Ms.Joshini Tuli, Ms.Babita Rana, Ms.Divya Javgid and Ms.Garima Shakya, Advocates. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI)... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr. Ravi Nayak APP for State. CRL. A. Nos. 733/2017, 996/2017 & 623/2017 Page 1 of 32 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT I. S. MEHTA, J.1. Instant Criminal Appeals arise from the Judgment dated 27.05.2017 and Order on Sentence dated 02.06.2017 in SC No.2216/2016, arising from FIR No.134/2011, PS Jaitpur, New Delhi, w...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »