Krishan Kumar vs.taruna Rani

Krishan Kumar vs Taruna Rani

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 24, 2019

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1226300

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1226300
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Oct 24, 2019
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Krishan Kumar

Respondent

Taruna Rani

Excerpt

.....leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the rent controller and an eviction order passed.2. respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under section 14(1) (e) of delhi rent control act, 1958 from one shop on ground floor of property bearing no.k-69, krishna nagar, delhi - 110051, more particularly as shown in black colour in the site plan rc.rev.249/2019 page 1 of 3 attached to the eviction petition.3. learned counsel for the petitioner under instructions from the petitioner, who is present in court in person, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.4.... petitioner who is present in court in person, undertakes that he shall vacate and handover the peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted premises to the respondent on or before 31.12.2020.... petitioner further undertakes that he shall pay a sum pay rs. 6000/- per month as use and occupation charges till the time he hands over the peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted premises to the respondent on or before 31.12.2020.5.... petitioner further undertakes that he shall clear all water, electricity and other dues/charges in respect of the tenanted premises before he vacates the premises. he further undertakes that he shall not sublet, assign or part with the possession of the tenanted premises or any part thereof. he further undertakes that he shall not cause any damage to the property and shall hand over the peaceful vacant possession of the same in the condition as it exists today subject to normal wear and tear.6. 7. the undertaking is accepted. learned counsel for the respondent under instructions from the respondent submits that the undertaking is also acceptable to the rc.rev.249/2019 page 2 of 3 respondent.8. 9. in view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. subject to petitioner filing an affidavit of undertaking in the above terms within a period of two weeks from today, execution of.....

Full Judgment

$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:

24. 10.2019 RC.REV. 249/2019 & CM APPL. 19209/2019 KRISHAN KUMAR TARUNA RANI versus ........ Petitioner

..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: Mr. Vikram Nandrajog, Advocate with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Satish Sharma, Advocate with respondent in person. CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner

impugns order dated 07.12.2018, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.

2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from one shop on ground floor of property bearing No.K-69, Krishna Nagar, Delhi - 110051, more particularly as shown in black colour in the site plan RC.REV.249/2019 Page 1 of 3 attached to the eviction petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner under instructions from the petitioner, who is present in Court in person, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.

4.... Petitioner

who is present in Court in person, undertakes that he shall vacate and handover the peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted premises to the respondent on or before 31.12.2020.... Petitioner

further undertakes that he shall pay a sum pay Rs. 6000/- per month as use and occupation charges till the time he hands over the peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted premises to the respondent on or before 31.12.2020.

5.... Petitioner

further undertakes that he shall clear all water, electricity and other dues/charges in respect of the tenanted premises before he vacates the premises. He further undertakes that he shall not sublet, assign or part with the possession of the tenanted premises or any part thereof. He further undertakes that he shall not cause any damage to the property and shall hand over the peaceful vacant possession of the same in the condition as it exists today subject to normal wear and tear.

6. 7. The undertaking is accepted. Learned counsel for the respondent under instructions from the respondent submits that the undertaking is also acceptable to the RC.REV.249/2019 Page 2 of 3 respondent.

8. 9. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Subject to petitioner filing an affidavit of undertaking in the above terms within a period of two weeks from today, execution of the impugned order dated 07.12.2018 shall remain stayed till 31.12.2020.

10. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. OCTOBER24 2019 ‘rs’ SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J RC.REV.249/2019 Page 3 of 3

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2019 Same Parties Krishan Kumar vs Taruna Rani Same Subject Land Acquisition