Ravinder & Ors vs.state Govt of Nct Delhi & Anr

Ravinder & Ors vs State Govt of Nct Delhi & Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Sep 28, 2018

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1218307

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1218307
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Sep 28, 2018
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ravinder & Ors

Respondent

State Govt of Nct Delhi & Anr

Excerpt

.....discord.2. learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have entered into a mou dated 25.03.2015. parties have already been divorced by way of a decree of divorce, passed on 13.12.2017. crl.m.c. 4968/2018 page 1 of 2 3. as per the settlement, a sum of rs. 50,000/- was agreed to be paid. a sum of rs.30,000/- has already been paid. balance amount of rs.20,000/- has been handed over to respondent no.2 in cash.4. respondent no.2 is present in court in person is represented by a counsel. respondent no.2 submits that she has settled the disputes with the petitioners and is agreeable to the settlement and does not wish to press the criminal charges against the petitioners any further.5. in view of the fact that the disputes between the petitioners and respondent no.2 emanate out of a matrimonial discord and have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. it would be expedient to quash the subject fir and the consequent proceedings emanating there from.6. in view of the above, the petition is allowed. fir no.42 of 2011 under sections 498a/4of the ipc registered at police station naraina, delhi, and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are, accordingly quashed.7. order dasti under signatures of the court master. september28 2018/rk crl.m.c. 4968/2018 sanjeev sachdeva, j page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4968/2018 Judgment delivered on:

28. 09.2018 RAVINDER & ORS STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ANR versus ........ Petitioner

s ........ RESPONDENTS

Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: For the Respondent: Mr.Ghanshyam Mishra, Adv. Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, Addl. PP for the State. Ms.Cheema Sharma, Adv. for R-2. CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2809.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner

s seek quashing of FIR No.42 of 2011 under Sections 498A/4
of the IPC registered at Police Station Naraina, Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.

2. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have entered into a MOU dated 25.03.2015. Parties have already been divorced by way of a decree of divorce, passed on 13.12.2017. CRL.M.C. 4968/2018 Page 1 of 2 3. As per the settlement, a sum of Rs. 50,000/- was agreed to be paid. A sum of Rs.30,000/- has already been paid. Balance amount of Rs.20,000/- has been handed over to respondent No.2 in cash.

4. Respondent No.2 is present in court in person is represented by a counsel. Respondent No.2 submits that she has settled the disputes with the petitioners and is agreeable to the settlement and does not wish to press the criminal charges against the petitioners any further.

5. In view of the fact that the disputes between the petitioners and respondent No.2 emanate out of a matrimonial discord and have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating there from.

6. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No.42 of 2011 under Sections 498A/4
of the IPC registered at Police Station Naraina, Delhi, and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are, accordingly quashed.

7. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. SEPTEMBER28 2018/rk CRL.M.C. 4968/2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Ravinder & Ors vs State Govt of Nct Delhi & Anr Same Subject Education