Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Inderwati vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2018
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 732/2018 Judgment delivered on:13. 08.2018 INDERWATI ........ Petitioner THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. S.K. Sharma, Adv. Mr.Kamal Kr. Ghai, Addl. PP for the State with SI Dara Singh, PS Okhla Indl. Area. Mr. Rishab Raj Jain, Adv. for R-2 /BSES-RPL CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1308.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.577 of 2016 under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, Police Station Okhla Indl. Area, Phase-II, New Delhi, based on a settlement.2. Subject FIR was registered consequent to a raid that had taken place in the premises of the petitioner where direct theft of electricity was alleged to have been found. A direct theft bill of Rs. 1,93,378/- was raised. The petitioner approached the respondent for a settlement CRL.M.C. 732/201...
Dr. Pramod Pal Sehgal vs.south Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2018
$~1 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM APPL. 26263/2018 in W.P. (C) 6402/2018 DR. PRAMOD PAL SEHGAL Mr. Sachin Chopra ........ Petitioner and Through: Ms.Aastha, Advs. versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Ruchi Jain and Mr.Govind, Advs. for SDMC Ms.Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel for North DMC and East DMC CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % ORDER1308.2018 CM APPL. 26263/2018 (for vacation of stay) 1. By this application, the Respondent No.1 seeks vacation of the order of stay, passed by us on 1st June, 2018, which reads thus: W.P.(C) 6402/2018 & CM No.24580/2018 (stay) Issue notice to show cause as to why rule nisi be 3. not issued.4. Mr. Sandeep Bajaj, Advocate accepts notice for respondent No.1 and Mr. Mini Pushkarna, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice for respondents no.2 & 3. W.P.(C) 6402/2018 Page 1 of 6 List on 5th September, 2018. Time is sought to fi...
State (Nct) of Delhi vs.momin @ Sabbir & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2018
$~35-37 & 39-40 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"13th August, 2018 CRL.M.C. 3780/2016 & Crl.M.A.15813/2016 STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Jasmer Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. versus MOMIN @ SABBIR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate /DHCLSC for R-3. CRL.M.C. 3781/2016 & Crl.M.A.15817/2016 STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Jasmer Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. versus SAMIR @ CHUKKAL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate /DHCLSC for R-1. CRL.M.C. 3805/2016 & Crl.M.A.15922/2016 STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Vivek, PS Nabi Karim ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 5 + + + versus RAHUL @ RITIK & ANR. Crl. M.C. No.3780/2016 & connected matters + + Through: Mr. Debajyoti Behuria, Advocate for R-1. CRL.M.C. 3879/2016 & Crl.M.A.16306/2016 ...
Sushil Kumar vs.master Lakshay
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2018
$~52 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:13. h August, 2018 Through: Mr. Bakul Jain, Advocate. ..... Appellant SUSHIL KUMAR * % + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 194/2018 MASTER LAKSHAY versus Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPLN. No.32374/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. MAT.APP.(F.C.) 194/2018 and CM APPLN. No.32373/2018 (Delay) 1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 19 (1) (4) of the Family Court Act read with Section 151 CPC assailing the order dated 12.01.2018 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi along with an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act read with Section 151 CPC seeking 155 days delay in filing the present appeal.2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that delay was on account of sufficient reasons and not on account of any carelessness...
Nikunj Thapar & Others vs.state and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2018
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4075/2018 Judgment delivered on:13. 08.2018 NIKUNJ THAPAR & OTHERS versus STATE AND ANOTHER Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Aditya Kapoor, Adv. along with petitioner No.1 in person. Mr. S.K. Gandhi & Mr. Shubhit Sharma, Advs. for P-2 to 4. Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Arti Singh Mr. Sabreena Bashir and Mr. M. Qayam Ud-din, Advs. for R-2 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1308.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 29881/2018 (Exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4075/2018 The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.599 of 2016 under 1. CRL.M.C. 4075/2018 Page 1 of 3 Sections 498A/4of the IPC registered at Police Station Patel Nagar, Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.2. Learned counsels fo...
Charlse Howell @ Abel Kom vs.n C B
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2018
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:4. h August, 2018 Pronounced on:13. h August, 2018 + CRL.A. 755/2016 CHARLSE HOWELL @ ABEL KOM ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Svetlana Khiyungdzuzu, Adv. N C B versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Subhash Bansal, Standing Counsel with Mr.Shashwat Bansal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. The appellant Charles Howell @ Abel Kom has been convicted, vide the impugned judgement, dated 8th October, 2015, passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS under Sections 21(c) and 23(c), read with Section 28 of the Narcotics, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), and sentenced, vide consequent order dated 13th October, 2015, to 10 years rigourous imprisonment along with a fine of 1 lakh, for each of the offences under Sections 21(c) and 23(c) of the Act, with 2 months simple imprisonment default sentence in each case, the sentences being directed to run concu...
State (Nct) of Delhi vs.rahul @ Ritik & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2018
$~35-37 & 39-40 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"13th August, 2018 CRL.M.C. 3780/2016 & Crl.M.A.15813/2016 STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Jasmer Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. versus MOMIN @ SABBIR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate /DHCLSC for R-3. CRL.M.C. 3781/2016 & Crl.M.A.15817/2016 STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Jasmer Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. versus SAMIR @ CHUKKAL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate /DHCLSC for R-1. CRL.M.C. 3805/2016 & Crl.M.A.15922/2016 STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Vivek, PS Nabi Karim ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 5 + + + versus RAHUL @ RITIK & ANR. Crl. M.C. No.3780/2016 & connected matters + + Through: Mr. Debajyoti Behuria, Advocate for R-1. CRL.M.C. 3879/2016 & Crl.M.A.16306/2016 ...
Ravinder Pal Singh & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2018
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4064/2018 & CRL.M.A298452018 Judgment delivered on:13. 08.2018 RAVINDER PAL SINGH & ORS. THE STATE & ANR. versus Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Prashant Singh Tanwar, Adv. For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Bachchan Singh Mr. Vikram Panwar, Adv. for R-2 & 3 JUDGMENT1308.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.626 of 2015 under Sections 323/325/3of the IPC registered at Police Station Keshav Puram, Delhi, based on a settlement.2. The parties are neighbours. The subject FIR was registered consequent to a quarrel that took place between the parties. As per the parties the quarrel took place on the spur of the moment on a CRL.M.C. 4064/2018 Page 1 of 3 misunderstanding.3. It is contended on behalf of the parties that parties have settled all th...
Rajesh Jindal vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2018
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:13. h August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 4246/2017 RAJESH JINDAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Anil K. Aggarwal, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent UNION OF INDIA CORAM: Through Mr. Pradeep Kumar Jha, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Rajneesh Sharma, Advocate, for LAC. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of the land of petitioners comprised in Khasra no.3min measuring 1 bigha 4-biswas, situated in the revenue estate of village Rani Khera, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act), as neither the com...
State (Nct) of Delhi vs.samir @ Chukkal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2018
$~35-37 & 39-40 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"13th August, 2018 CRL.M.C. 3780/2016 & Crl.M.A.15813/2016 STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Jasmer Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. versus MOMIN @ SABBIR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate /DHCLSC for R-3. CRL.M.C. 3781/2016 & Crl.M.A.15817/2016 STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Jasmer Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. versus SAMIR @ CHUKKAL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate /DHCLSC for R-1. CRL.M.C. 3805/2016 & Crl.M.A.15922/2016 STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Vivek, PS Nabi Karim ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 5 + + + versus RAHUL @ RITIK & ANR. Crl. M.C. No.3780/2016 & connected matters + + Through: Mr. Debajyoti Behuria, Advocate for R-1. CRL.M.C. 3879/2016 & Crl.M.A.16306/2016 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- Next ›
- Last »