Inderwati vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Ors.

Inderwati vs The State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Aug 13, 2018

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1216992

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1216992
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Aug 13, 2018
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Inderwati

Respondent

The State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Ors.

Excerpt

.....delhi, based on a settlement.2. subject fir was registered consequent to a raid that had taken place in the premises of the petitioner where direct theft of electricity was alleged to have been found. a direct theft bill of rs. 1,93,378/- was raised. the petitioner approached the respondent for a settlement crl.m.c. 732/2018 page 1 of 2 and the bill was reduced to rs.90,000/-. the said amount has been paid and a no dues certificate dated 28.03.2017 has been issued.3. learned counsel appearing for respondent no.2/bses submits that since respondent no.2 has received the entire settlement amount, respondent no.2/bses-rpl does not wish to press the present complaint against the petitioner any further.4. in view of the fact that the disputes between the parties have been settled and petitioner has paid the settled amount, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. it would also be expedient to quash the subject fir and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.5. in view of the above, fir no.577 of 2016 under section 135 of the indian electricity act, 2003, police station okhla indl. area, phase-ii, new delhi and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are quashed.6. order dasti under the signatures of the court master. august13 2018 ‘rs’ crl.m.c. 732/2018 sanjeev sachdeva, j page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 732/2018 Judgment delivered on:

13. 08.2018 INDERWATI ........ Petitioner

THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS

versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: For the Respondent: Mr. S.K. Sharma, Adv. Mr.Kamal Kr. Ghai, Addl. PP for the State with SI Dara Singh, PS Okhla Indl. Area. Mr. Rishab Raj Jain, Adv. for R-2 /BSES-RPL CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1308.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.577 of 2016 under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, Police Station Okhla Indl. Area, Phase-II, New Delhi, based on a settlement.

2. Subject FIR was registered consequent to a raid that had taken place in the premises of the petitioner where direct theft of electricity was alleged to have been found. A direct theft bill of Rs. 1,93,378/- was raised. The petitioner approached the respondent for a settlement CRL.M.C. 732/2018 Page 1 of 2 and the bill was reduced to Rs.90,000/-. The said amount has been paid and a No Dues Certificate dated 28.03.2017 has been issued.

3. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2/BSES submits that since respondent No.2 has received the entire settlement amount, respondent No.2/BSES-RPL does not wish to press the present complaint against the petitioner any further.

4. In view of the fact that the disputes between the parties have been settled and petitioner has paid the settled amount, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would also be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

5. In view of the above, FIR No.577 of 2016 under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, Police Station Okhla Indl. Area, Phase-II, New Delhi and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are quashed.

6. Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master. AUGUST13 2018 ‘rs’ CRL.M.C. 732/2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Inderwati vs The State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Ors. Same Subject Land Acquisition