Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhagwat Singh Meena vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:14. h August, 2018 + W.P.(CRL) 1925/2018 and Crl. M.A. No.11823/2018 (stay) BHAGWAT SINGH MEENA ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. S.N. Gupta and Ms. Shika Meena, Advocates with petitioner in person. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Ms. Purnima Malik, Advocate for Mr. Avi Singh, Additional Standing Counsel for State with SI Anuj Singh, PS Hazrat Nizamuddin. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Aggrieved by the order dated 29th May, 2018 petitioner prefers the present petition.2.... Petitioner was facing summary trial under Section 16 of the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 and vide the judgment dated 28th May, 2018 the learned Additional District Magistrate held that the respondent employed the victim Walter Kerketta @ Raju and did not pay wages as per the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and thus it is to be presumed that the employment of victim Walter...
Surender Kumar Gupta & Ors. Vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
$~62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4086/2018 Judgment delivered on:14. 08.2018 SURENDER KUMAR GUPTA & ORS versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Saurabh Jhamb, Adv. along with petitioners in person. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI C.L. Meena Mr. Ashutosh Mishra, Adv. for R-2 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1408.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 29930/2018 (Exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4086/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.983 of 2015 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC registered at Police Station Gokal CRL.M.C. 4086/2018 Page 1 of 3 Puri (District North-East), Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.2. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have settled...
Sri Niwas Shukla vs.bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: August 14, 2018 + MAC.APP. 312/2013 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate Versus SRIN NIWAS SHUKLA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Saquib Arbab and Mr. Abhishek Grover, Advocates for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 + MAC.APP. 66/2018 SRI NIWAS SHUKLA ..... Appellant Through: Versus Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate. BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Saquib Arbab and Mr. Abhishek Grover, Advocates for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Impugned Award of 22nd January, 2013 grants compensation of 10,37,140/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum to Sri Niwas, aged 49 years MAC.APPs. 312/2013 & 66/2018 Page 1 of 7 (hereinafter referred to as Injured) on account of grievous injury suffered by him in ...
Ramesh Chandra vs.assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
$~9&10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision : August 14, 2018 + W.P.(C) 5684/2017 RAMESH CHANDRA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr Vikas Srivastava, Advocate. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX..... Respondent Through : Mr Zoheb Hossain, Advocate for Revenue. + W.P.(C) 5717/2017 SANJAY CHANDRA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr Vikas Srivastava, Advocate. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through : Mr Zoheb Hossain, Advocate for Revenue. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (ORAL) % The petitioners under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, seek common relief by way of a direction to the respondent W.P.(C) 5684/2017 & 5717/2017 Page 1 of 9 for quashing the impugned notice dated 30.03.2017 and the impugned order dated 02.05.2017 made under Sectionof the Income Tax Act, 1961(hereafter the Act).2. It is contended that the impugned notice and the...
Suraj Bhan and Ors vs.govt. Of Nct Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:14. h August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 7395/2017 SURAJ BHAN AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr.Manish Vats, Advocate. Versus GOVT. OF NCT DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for L&B/LAC. Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to land admeasuring 18 bighas and 19 biswas comprised in Khasra No.106 min (0-2), 124 min (0-2), 146 min (1-02), 198 min (0-3), 252 min (1-04), 253 min (1-04), 254 min (1-04), 255 min (1-04), 256 min (0-09), 575 min (1-02), 587 min (1-02), 594 min (1-02), 595 min (1-02), 771 min (0-17), 631 min (1-02), 632 min (1-02), 773 min (0-12), 776 min (0-12), 777 min (0-12), 780 min (0-12), 781 min (0-12), 784 mi...
Bhushan Malik vs.state (Government of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:14. 08.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1545/2018 % + BHUSHAN MALIK STATE (GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI) versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr. V.Madhukar & Mr.Susheel Kumar, Advocates. Mr. Raghuvinder Varma, APP for State. Mr. R.S.Jakhar & Mr. Neeraj, Advocates for Complainant CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1408.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No.46/2018 under Sections 376/506/328/354 IPC registered at P.S. Vasant Kunj. Subsequently, Sections 8, 12 & 14 of the POCSO Act have been added after a supplementary statement of the prosecutrix.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the prosecutrix met the BAIL APPLN. 1545/2018 Page 1 of 6 petitioner at the marriage of one of the relations and was known to the petitioner since the year 2014. It is alleged that on 19.11.2016, the petition...
Vibhor Fialok vs.krishan Dev & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 14, 2018 + MAC.APP. 976/2017 & CM406032017 U P STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ....Appellant Through: Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate for Ms. Garima Prashad, Advocate versus VIBHOR FIALOK & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar and Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Advocates + MAC.APP. 585/2018 VIBHOR FIALOK Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar and Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Advocates ..... Appellant 1. versus KRISHAN DEV & ANR Through: Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate for Ms. Garima Prashad, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 8th June, 2017 grants compensation of `4,24,000/- with interest @ 9% per annum to a private employee-Vibhor, aged 28 years (hereinafter referred to as Injured) on account of grievous MAC.App.976/2017 & 585/2018 Page 1 of 7 injuries suffered by him in a vehicular accident, which took place on 4th August, 2014.2. In the above captioned first appeal, the Owner of Bus in q...
Kavita vs.indian Oil Corporation Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2919/2017 & CM No.12743/2017 Judgment reserved on:13. 3.2018 Judgment pronounced on:14. 8.2018 KAVITA Through : Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Mrs. Biji Rajesh and Ms. Eshita Baruah, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR Through : Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv. with and Ms. Ms. Mala Narayan Madhumanti Ghose, Advs. for R-1. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.Prefatory facts:1. This writ petition has been filed seeking the following substantive directions against respondent No.1 i.e., Indian Oil Corporation Limited (hereafter referred to as IOCL): a) Quash the Seniority List (Annexure P-7) prepared by the Respondent Corporation for the preferential allotment of Retail Outlet to pending SC/ST LOI Holders (selected without land). b) Direct the Respondent no.1 Corporation to re-draw the Seniority list on the basis of the date of Interview. W.P.(C) No.2919/2017 Pg. 1 of 15 c) ...
Dalip Singh & Anr vs.tulsi Ram (Deceased) Through Lrs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. h August, 2018. RSA2012017 DALIP SINGH & ANR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dilpreet Singh and Mr. Harpreet Singh, Advs. for Appellant No.1 along with appellant No.1 in person. Mr. Nitish Negi, Adv. for Mr. Vikas Sharma, Adv. for Appellant No.2. TULSI RAM (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS .... Respondent Through: Mr. Anil K. Batra and Mr. Praveen Versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 Kumar, Advs. This Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 27th May, 2016 in CIS- RCA DJ -8785/2016 (CNR-DLST01-000894-2015) of the Court of District Judge-South]. of dismissal of First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC preferred by the two appellants against the judgment and decree [dated 21st January, 2015 in Suit No.621/2014 (UID No.02401C0914682007) of the Court of Civil Judge-12 (Central)]. allowing the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff against the appell...
Deepu & Anr. Vs.the State ( Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
$~68 & 71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4096/2018 Judgment delivered on:14. 08.2018 BABINDER SINGH MAAN & ORS ........ Petitioners versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + CRL.M.C. 4108/2018 DEEPU & ANR ........ Petitioners versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Gaurav Bhatt, Adv. (Crl. M.C. 4096/2018) Mr. Varun Sharma, Adv. (Crl. M.C. 4108/2018) Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Sukhbir Singh Mr. Varun Sharma, Adv. for R-2 (Crl. M.C. 4096/2018) Ms. Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Sukhbir Singh. Mr. Gaurav Bhatt, Adv. for R-2 (Crl. M.C. 4108/2018) CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA CRL.M.C. 4096/2018 & 4108/2018 Page 1 of 3 JUDGMENT1408.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners, in Crl. M.C. 4096/2018 seek quashing of FIR No.691/2014 under Sections 354/354-B/506/509/3of the IPC at...
- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- Next ›
- Last »