Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Deepu & Anr. Vs.the State ( Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)

Deepu & Anr. vs The State ( Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Aug 14, 2018
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1217024

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Deepu & Anr.

Respondent

The State ( Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)

Excerpt

.....dated 27.11.2017 has been executed between the parties through the process of mediation held before the delhi mediation centre, rohini courts, delhi.4. both the parties are present in court in person, represented by their respective counsel and identified by the investigating officer. they submit that they have resolved their disputes and now are residing together amicably. they assure that they will not quarrel in future with each other. they submit that they have has settled all their crl.m.c. 4096/2018 & 4108/2018 page 2 of 3 disputes with each other and are agreeable to the settlement and do not wish to press the criminal charges against each other any further.5. in view of the fact that the disputes between the parties have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. it would be expedient to quash the subject fir and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.6. in view of the above, the petitions are allowed. fir no.691/2014 under sections 354/354-b/506/509/3of the ipc at police station keshav puram, new delhi and fir no.690/2014 under sections 354/354-b/506/5of the ipc at police station keshav puram, new delhi and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are quashed.7. order dasti under signatures of the court master. august14 2018 ‘rs’ sanjeev sachdeva, j crl.m.c. 4096/2018 & 4108/2018 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~68 & 71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4096/2018 Judgment delivered on:

14. 08.2018 BABINDER SINGH MAAN & ORS ........ Petitioner

s versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS

+ CRL.M.C. 4108/2018 DEEPU & ANR ........ Petitioner

s versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: For the Respondent: Mr. Gaurav Bhatt, Adv. (Crl. M.C. 4096/2018) Mr. Varun Sharma, Adv. (Crl. M.C. 4108/2018) Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Sukhbir Singh Mr. Varun Sharma, Adv. for R-2 (Crl. M.C. 4096/2018) Ms. Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Sukhbir Singh. Mr. Gaurav Bhatt, Adv. for R-2 (Crl. M.C. 4108/2018) CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA CRL.M.C. 4096/2018 & 4108/2018 Page 1 of 3 JUDGMENT1408.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1. The petitioners, in Crl. M.C. 4096/2018 seek quashing of FIR No.691/2014 under Sections 354/354-B/506/509/3
of the IPC at Police Station Keshav Puram, New Delhi and the petitioners, in Crl. M.C. 4108/2018 seek quashing of FIR No.690/2014 under Sections 354/354-B/506/5
of the IPC at Police Station Keshav Puram, New Delhi, based on a settlement.

2. The parties are neighbours. The subject FIRs are cross FIRs and were registered consequent to a quarrel that took place between the parties on a trivial issue.

3. It is contended on behalf of the parties that the parties have settled their disputes with the intervention of respectable persons of the society, elders, well-wishers and family members. Settlement Agreement dated 27.11.2017 has been executed between the parties through the process of mediation held before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini Courts, Delhi.

4. Both the parties are present in court in person, represented by their respective counsel and identified by the Investigating Officer. They submit that they have resolved their disputes and now are residing together amicably. They assure that they will not quarrel in future with each other. They submit that they have has settled all their CRL.M.C. 4096/2018 & 4108/2018 Page 2 of 3 disputes with each other and are agreeable to the settlement and do not wish to press the criminal charges against each other any further.

5. In view of the fact that the disputes between the parties have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

6. In view of the above, the petitions are allowed. FIR No.691/2014 under Sections 354/354-B/506/509/3
of the IPC at Police Station Keshav Puram, New Delhi and FIR No.690/2014 under Sections 354/354-B/506/5
of the IPC at Police Station Keshav Puram, New Delhi and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are quashed.

7. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. AUGUST14 2018 ‘rs’ SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J CRL.M.C. 4096/2018 & 4108/2018 Page 3 of 3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial