Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pankaj Gautam vs.parma Devi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % PANKAJ GAUTAM RFA No.779/2016 16th August, 2018 Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Himanshu Upadhyaya, Advocate (M. No.9811254646). PARMA DEVI & ANR. versus Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. No one is present for the respondents in spite of the matter having been passed over.2. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 CPC is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 19.3.2016 by which trial court has dismissed the suit for specific performance filed by the appellant/plaintiff by deciding issue nos.1 and 2 framed as preliminary issues. RFA No.779/2016 Page 1 of 4 3. The following issues were framed in the suit for specific performance:-"1) the court?..... OPP Whether the suit is maintainable as framed and presented before Whether the suit is barred under any...
Union of India and Ors. Vs.sheela Devi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~31. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9909/2017 1. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus SHEELA DEVI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pradeep Kumar and Mr. Parveen Kumar Nagpal, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % The petitioners/Department of Posts, Ministry of Communication and ORDER1608.2018 Information Technology have challenged an order dated 07.02.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, allowing O.A. No.4129/2013 filed by the respondent praying inter alia for regularisation against a Group D post/MTS Cadre with effect from the date when she was granted temporary status with all consequential benefits, including retiral benefits from the date of her superannuation, i.e., 31.12.2012. Under the impugned order dated 07.02.2017, the Tribunal directed the petitioners to conduct a review of the minutes of the DPC held on 26.08.2013,...
Poonam Yadav vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 6465/2017 Date of Judgment:16. h August, 2018 POONAM YADAV ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Vibha Mahajan Seth, Advocate versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Ms. Shahana Farah, Mr. Chitral Raj Gambhir and Mr. Rahul Dubey, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of the land of petitioner, i.e., bearing no.25-B, measuring 50 sq.yds(15 x 30), out of the land measuring 2480 bigha 01 biswa comprised in Khasra no.14/12, situated in the revenue estate of village Mubarakpur Dabas, known as Kishan Vihar, Roop Vihar, Delhi-110086 (hereinafter referred to as the subje...
Daljit Singh & Ors vs.inderjit Singh & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :31st July, 2018 Date of decision :16th August, 2018 RFA8752016, CMs APPL.8942/2017, 8994/2017, 15331/2017 & 22338/2018 SARDAR DALJIT SINGH & ORS ..Appellants Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hitender Kapur, Mr. Sagar Chawla, Ms. Manisha Mehta & Ms. Mrigna Advocates. (M:9810229189) Shekher, versus SARDAR INDERJIT SINGH KHUMAN ..Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shobhana Takial, Advocate. (M:9810962950) + DALJIT SINGH & ORS WITH RFA382017 ..Appellants Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hitender Kapur, Mr. Sagar Chawla, Ms. Manisha Mehta & Ms. Mrigna Shekher, Advocates. INDERJIT SINGH & ANR versus ..Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shobhana Takial, Advocate. (M:9810962950) + DALJIT SINGH RFA392017 ..Appellant Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hitender Kapur, Mr. Sagar Chawla, Ms. Manisha Mehta & Ms. Mrigna Shekher...
Sunder Impex Pvt. Ltd & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~6, 13 & 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. 08.2018 + W.P.(C) 9898/2017 & CM403382017, 43024/2017 PRIYANKA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr Alok Yadav, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr Gigi C.George, Senior Standing Counsel for R-1. Mr Sanjeev Narula, Senior Standing Counsel for R-2 & 3. + W.P.(C) 10314/2017 & CM420552017 SUNDER IMPEX PVT. LTD & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr Abhas Mishra and Ms Seema Singh, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr Waize Ali Noor, Advocate for R-1. Mr Harpreet Singh, Advocate for R-2. WP(C) 9898/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 + W.P.(C) 454/2018 & CM19462018 MAGPPIE INTERNATIONAL LTD. & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr Prashant Srivastava, Ms Malabika Sarkar and Mr Deepak Mahajan, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGS...
Avinash Srivastava vs.estate Officer, Directorate of Estates
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + W.P.(C) 11029/2017 & CMs No.45098/2017 (for stay) & Date of decision:16. h August, 2018. 5466/2018 (for condonation of 20 days delay in filing the appeal) AVINASH SRIVASTAVA Through: Ms. Gargee Dixit, Adv. ........ Petitioner Versus ESTATE OFFICER, DIRECTORATE OF ESTATES ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna and Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Advs. with Mr. Harvesh Kumar, Assistant Director and Mr. Tilak Raj, ASO of DOE. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugns the order [dated 23rd November, 2017 in PPA Appeal No.08/2017 of the Court of District Judge (HQs) acting as the Appellate Officer under Section 9 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 (PP Act)]. of dismissal of appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 16th May, 2017 under Section 5 of the Act of the Estate Officer of eviction of the petitioner from Quarter No.191, B...
Hem Chand Sharma(dead) Thr Lr & Anr vs.m/s. Innovative Textiles Ltd. & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~20 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA(OS).10/2018 HEM CHAND SHARMA(DEAD) THR LR & ANR..... Appellants Date of Judgment:16. h August, 2018 Through: Mr. V.K. Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Mahajan, Ms. Ruchira Gupta and Mr. Anurag Sharma, Advocates M/s. INNOVATIVE TEXTILES LTD. & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sachin Datta, Dr. Farrukh Khan, Mr. Changhez Khan, Mr. Abhishek Kumar and Mohd. Shadub, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL69812018(delay) and 6980/2018(stay) & RFA(OS).10/2018 1. This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act filed by the appellant seeking condonation of 629 days delay in filing the present appeal against the order dated 27.05.2016.2. Mr. Gupta, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant submits that the delay in filing the appeal was not deliberate nor on account of carelessness or inaction, but on account of bona fide re...
Satya Prakash vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
Judgment delivered on:16. 08.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1857/2018 & CRL.M.A. 29370/2018 $~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + SATYA PRAKASH THE STATE Advocates who appeared in this case: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr. Rajat Aneja and Ms. Chandrika Gupta, Advs. Ms. Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Bajrang CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1608.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.330/2018 under Sections of the Juvenile Justice Act, registered at Police Station Karol Bagh, Delhi.2. The allegations against the petitioner in the FIR are that a raid was conducted by the SDM consequent to a complaint received from a NGO/Salaam Balak Trust. During the raid two boys were found BAIL APPLN. 1857/2018 Page 1 of 3 working in the Dhaba of the petitioner; one aged about 17 years of age and the other aged about 18 years. As per the FIR, the boys were rescued and pro...
Manoj & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16.08.2018 CRL.M.C. 4131/2018 MANOJ & ANR STATE & ANR. versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner(s) : For the Respondent(s): Mr.Vinod Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with ASI Rajesh Kumar, P.S.Bawana. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1608.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM Appl.30076/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4131/2018 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.184/2017 under Sections 323/341/4IPC at Police Station Bawana.2. The parties are related to each other and living in the same property. Subject FIR was registered consequent to a quarrel that took place between the parties with regard to a minor alteration work in the property. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have 3. CRL.M.C. 4131/2018 Page 1 of 2 settled their dispute...
Larsen & Toubro Limited vs.delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$-25 & 24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h August, 2018 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 329/2018 & IA109272018 (24) O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 328/2018 & IA109262018 LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Atul Sharma, Mr.Ravi Varma, Mr.Suadat Kirmani, Mr.Abhinav Sharma & Mr.Lakshay Khanna, Advs. versus DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. & ANR. DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. These petitions have been filed by the petitioner seeking an order restraining the respondent No.1 from invoking and/or encashing the Performance Bank Guarantee(s) furnished by the petitioner in terms of the Contract(s) executed between the parties. As common questions are involved in these petitions, the facts are taken from OMP (I) (COMM) 329/2018.2. The petitioner had been awarded the work of construction of elevated viaduct, 6 elevated stations viz Aluva, Pulinchodu, Companypady...
- ‹ Prev
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- Next ›
- Last »