Manoj & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.

Manoj & Anr. vs State & Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Aug 16, 2018

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1217062

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1217062
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Aug 16, 2018
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manoj & Anr.

Respondent

State & Anr.

Excerpt

.....in the same property. subject fir was registered consequent to a quarrel that took place between the parties with regard to a minor alteration work in the property. learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have 3. crl.m.c. 4131/2018 page 1 of 2 settled their disputes with the intervention of other family members. parties assure that they shall not quarrel in future and shall maintain cordial relations and peace and harmony in the locality.4. respondent nos.2 & 3/complainants are present in court in person, represented through their counsel and identified by the investigating officer. they submit that they have settled their dispute with the petitioners and do not wish to press the complaint against them any further.5. in view of the fact that the disputes between the parties have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. it would be expedient to quash the subject fir and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.6. in view of the above, the petition is allowed. fir no.184/2017 under sections 323/341/4ipc at police station bawana and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are, accordingly quashed.7. order dasti under signatures of the court master. august16 2018/rk crl.m.c. 4131/2018 sanjeev sachdeva, j page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16.08.2018 CRL.M.C. 4131/2018 MANOJ & ANR STATE & ANR. versus ........ Petitioner

s ........ RESPONDENTS

Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

(s) : For the Respondent(s): Mr.Vinod Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with ASI Rajesh Kumar, P.S.Bawana. CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1608.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) CM Appl.30076/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4131/2018 1.... Petitioner

s seek quashing of FIR No.184/2017 under Sections 323/341/4
IPC at Police Station Bawana.

2. The parties are related to each other and living in the same property. Subject FIR was registered consequent to a quarrel that took place between the parties with regard to a minor alteration work in the property. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have 3. CRL.M.C. 4131/2018 Page 1 of 2 settled their disputes with the intervention of other family members. Parties assure that they shall not quarrel in future and shall maintain cordial relations and peace and harmony in the locality.

4. Respondent Nos.2 & 3/complainants are present in court in person, represented through their counsel and identified by the Investigating Officer. They submit that they have settled their dispute with the petitioners and do not wish to press the complaint against them any further.

5. In view of the fact that the disputes between the parties have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

6. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No.184/2017 under Sections 323/341/4
IPC at Police Station Bawana and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are, accordingly quashed.

7. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. AUGUST16 2018/rk CRL.M.C. 4131/2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Manoj & Anr. vs State & Anr. Same Subject Land Acquisition