Delhi Court July 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Narender Kumar vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~77 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:31. 07.2018 CRL.M.C. 3800/2018 NARENDER KUMAR ........ Petitioner versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)& ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner(s) : For the Respondent(s): CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms.Shrey Chathly, Adv Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Om Prakash, P.S.Sunlight Colony. Ms.Aishwarya Kumar, Adv. for R-2. JUDGMENT3107.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM Appl.28975/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3800/2018 & CRL.M.A. 28974/2018 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.57/2013 under Sections 354/341/323/506 at Police Station Sunlight Colony. Parties are neighbours.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner had misbehaved with the respondent, however, with the intervention of other members of the locality as well as the mediator, parties have settled their disputes be...
Smt. Anju Nigam vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.2464/2000 Reserved on :18. h May, 2018 Date of decision:31. t July, 2018 SMT. ANJU NIGAM ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Amit Gupta, Mr.Anant A. Pavgi, Mr.Anshul Sharma, Ms. Mansi Kukreja, Mr.Padma Kumar, Advocates Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.Nikhil Bhardwaj, Adv. for Union of India. Mr. R.L. Dhawan, Advocate for R-9 to R-13. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI SANJIV KHANNA, J.: The afore-stated writ petition filed by Anju Nigam impugning order dated 7th April, 1999, passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) in OA No.2225/1997 was allowed vide judgment dated 31st August, 2009, with the direction that she be treated as an officer appointed on the post of Junior Time Scale in the Indian Postal Service with effect from ...
South Asia Human Rights doc.trust & Othe vs.suhas Chakma and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. h July, 2018 Pronounced on:31. t July, 2018 + CS(COMM) 96/2018, IA No.4926/2009, 8383/2013 + ASIAN INDIGENOUS AND TRIBAL PEOPLES Through Mr.Nitesh ..... Plaintiff Singh, Kumar Ms.Savita and Ms.Neha, Advs. SOUTH ASIA HUMAN RIGHTS DOCUMENTATION versus ..... Defendant CS(COMM) 133/2018, Crl.M.A.1389/2017, IA No.10889/2006, 13353/2013, 6285/2014, 891/2017, 8791/2017 Through Mr.Jawahar Raja, Adv. SOUTH ASIA HUMAN RIGHTS DOC.TRUST & OTHE ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Jawahar Raja, Adv. SUHAS CHAKMA AND OTHERS versus Through Mr.Nitesh Kumar ..... Defendant Singh, Ms.Savita and Ms.Neha, Advs. for D-1 & 4 Mr.Raju, Adv. for D-2 & 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.IA No.1657/2017 in CS(COMM) 96/2018 CS(COMM) No.96/2018 and CS (COMM.) 133/2018 Page 1 of 7 1. This application is filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC. The plaintiff instituted this suit seeking permanent injunction restraining infring...
New India Assurance Co Ltd & Ors. Vs.nikhil Kumar Sharma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: July 31, 2018 + MAC.APP. 772/2015 & C.Ms. 22910/2015, 13773/2017 & 24431/2017 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate .....Appellant + MAC.APP. 919/2015 NISHA KAPOOR & ORS. Versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate .....Appellants NISHA KAPOOR & ORS + MAC.APP. 36/2016 & C.M. 1499/2016 Versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD & ORS. Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate ..... Respondent THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate .....Appellant Versus NIKHIL KUMAR SHARMA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate MAC.APP.772/2015 MAC.APP. 919/2015 MAC.APP. 36/2016 Page 1 of 8 1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned first two appeals arise out of impugned Award of 31st July, 2015, vide which the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (henceforth referred to as the Tribunal) has awarded comp...
Havells India Limited vs.puri Electrical and Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1213/2016 HAVELLS INDIA LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sudeep Chatterjee, Adv Ms. Nupur Lamba Adv. and Ms. SonalChhablani Adv. Versus Ex parte ..... Defendants Through PURI ELECTRICAL AND LTD. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN Date of Decision:31. t July, 2018 JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for injunction restraining passing off, dilution, rendition of accounts, damages etc. The prayer clause in the suit is reproduced hereinbelow:-"A. Pass a decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their C&F Agents, dealers, distributors, retailers, representatives agents and assignees form in any manner selling the impugned MARIGOLD and POPPY series of ceiling fans or any other fans which is either identical or deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs FUSION series or which are a colourable imitation or a substantial reproduction of the plaintiffs design, get-up, layout, trade CS(COMM) 1213/20...
Ms. Vinny Rajpal vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~62 & 63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3772/2018 Judgment delivered on:31. 07.2018 MS. VINNY RAJPAL STATE & ANR versus + CRL.M.C. 3774/2018 AND RAJIV RAJPAL STATE & ANR versus Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Tushar Saini, Advocate. Ms. Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with ASI Lavkesh Kumar (Crl. M.C. 3772/2018) Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghai, Addl. PP for the State with SI Ajeet Kumar (Crl. M.C. 3774/2018) For the... Petitioner(s) : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT3107.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 28878/2018 (Exemption) in Crl. M.C. 3772/2018 & Crl. M.A. 28883/2018 (Exemption) in Crl. M.C. 3774/2018 CRL.M.C. 3772 & 3774/2018 Page 1 of 3 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Crl. M.C. 3772/2018 & Crl. M.C. 3774/2018 1. The petitioner, in Crl. M.C. 3772/2018, seeks quashing of FIR No.11 of 2017 under Sectionsof the IPC Polic...
M/S Sarr Freight Corporation vs.engineers India Limited and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7930/2018 M/S SARR FREIGHT CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through Mr Akshay Makhija, Ms Kriti Agnihotri, Advocate Mr Vikas Bhadauria, Advocates. versus ENGINEERS INDIA LIMITED AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms Neelam Rathore, Ms Pooja Sharma, Mr Shantanu Devansh, Mr Zuber Ali Khan, Advocate for R1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER3107.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 Issue notice. The learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1 accepts notice. The petition is taken up for final hearing.2. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 25.06.2018 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by respondent no.1 (hereafter EIL). By the impugned order, the petitioner has been debarred from participating in any contract or entering into any transaction for a period of three years from the date of the impugned order. W.P.(C) 7930/2018 Page 1 of 6 3. The impugned order was premised on a finding...
Ravinder Pal Singh Baweja & Anr vs.barjinder Pal Singh Baweja & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~O-19 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2018 CS(OS) 1188/2009 RAVINDER PAL SINGH BAWEJA & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Arjun Mitra, Adv. for plaintiff No.2. versus BARJINDER PAL SINGH BAWEJA & ORS. Through: ..... Defendants JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The plaintiffs are seeking partition of property bearing No.B-18, Bazar Marg, Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi.2. On 20th November, 2017, this Court passed a preliminary decree. The shares of the parties as per the preliminary decree are as under:-"(i) Ravinder Pal Singh (Plaintiff No.1) (ii) Tejinder Pal Singh (Plaintiff No.2) (iii) Barjinder Pal Singh (Defendant No.1) (iv) Ishmeet Singh (Defendant No.3) (v) Puneet Singh (Defendant No.4) (vi) Ms. Harjeet Kaur (Defendant No.2) 3. Vide order dated 20th November, 2017, this Court appointed the Local Commissioner to suggest the modes of partition. The Local Commissioner CS(OS) 1188/2009 Page 1 of 2 has submitted her report dated 28th February, 2018 according t...
M/S Jitf Water Infrastructure Ltd vs.m/s Natconn Engineering Pvt Ltd ( ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~4 & 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 31, 2018 + CONT.CAS(C) 928/2015 M/S NATCONN ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED + versus PRABHJEET SINGH & ORS FAO(OS) 526/2015 M/S JITF WATER INFRASTRUCTURE LTD versus M/S NATCONN ENGINEERING PVT LTD (NEPT) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Nilava Bandyopadhyay, Mr. Vijaya Singh, Advocates in Item 5 Counsel for the respondent: Mr. A. Mishra, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. V.K.Shukla, Advocate for respondent No.2 State of MP. Mr. Nilava Bandyopadhyay, Mr. Vijaya Singh, Advocates in Item 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA ORDER % S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellants grievance is with respect to the order of the learned Single Judge under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Cont. Cas (C) No.928/2015 & FAO (OS) No.526/2015 Page 1 of 4 Conciliation Act (hereinafter referred to as Arbitration Act), thereby, dir...
Shahnawaz Ahmed & Anr vs.nahila Begum & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~27 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:31. t July, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 1429/2016 and Crl. M.A. 6075/2016 SHAHNAWAZ AHMED & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ajay Saini, Mohd. Unis, Mohd. Javed and Mr. Imran Kavial, Advocates versus NAHILA BEGUM & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Sana Ansari and MR. I. Ahmed, Advocates for R-1 Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioners are brothers of Dilnawaz Ahmed, first respondent being his widow. She is residing in a portion of property bearing no.4902, First floor, Bara Hindu Rao claiming it to be her shared household on account of matrimonial relationship. By a petition under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 before the Metropolitan Magistrate (case no.92/1/14), she alleges having been subjected to various acts of commission or omission, they constituting domestic violence. She has prayed for various reliefs including restraint order against ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »