Narender Kumar vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Narender Kumar vs State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Jul 31, 2018

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1216592

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1216592
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Jul 31, 2018
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Narender Kumar

Respondent

State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Excerpt

.....parties are neighbours.2. the allegations in the fir are that the petitioner had misbehaved with the respondent, however, with the intervention of other members of the locality as well as the mediator, parties have settled their disputes before the mediation centre, saket courts and a settlement agreement crl.m.c. 3800/2018 page 1 of 2 dated 16.09.2014 has been entered into. the petitioner has unconditionally apologised to the respondent and she has accepted his apology.3. respondent no.2 is present in court in person, represented by his counsel and identified by the investigating officer. she submits that she has settled the disputes with the petitioner and does not wish to press the complaint against him any further.4. in view of the fact that the disputes between the petitioner and respondent no.2 have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. it would be expedient to quash the subject fir and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.5. in view of the above, the petition is allowed. fir no.57/2013 under sections 354/341/323/506 at police station sunlight colony and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are accordingly quashed. order dasti under signatures of the court master.6. july31 2018/rk sanjeev sachdeva, j crl.m.c. 3800/2018 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~77 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:

31. 07.2018 CRL.M.C. 3800/2018 NARENDER KUMAR ........ Petitioner

versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)& ANR ........ RESPONDENTS

Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

(s) : For the Respondent(s): CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms.Shrey Chathly, Adv Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Om Prakash, P.S.Sunlight Colony. Ms.Aishwarya Kumar, Adv. for R-2. JUDGMENT3107.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) CM Appl.28975/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3800/2018 & CRL.M.A. 28974/2018 1.... Petitioner

seeks quashing of FIR No.57/2013 under Sections 354/341/323/506 at Police Station Sunlight Colony. Parties are neighbours.

2. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner had misbehaved with the respondent, however, with the intervention of other members of the locality as well as the mediator, parties have settled their disputes before the Mediation Centre, Saket Courts and a settlement agreement CRL.M.C. 3800/2018 Page 1 of 2 dated 16.09.2014 has been entered into. The petitioner has unconditionally apologised to the respondent and she has accepted his apology.

3. Respondent No.2 is present in court in person, represented by his counsel and identified by the Investigating Officer. She submits that she has settled the disputes with the petitioner and does not wish to press the complaint against him any further.

4. In view of the fact that the disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.2 have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

5. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No.57/2013 under Sections 354/341/323/506 at Police Station Sunlight Colony and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are accordingly quashed. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

6. JULY31 2018/rk SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J CRL.M.C. 3800/2018 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Narender Kumar vs State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr. Same Subject Land Acquisition