Delhi Court July 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sangeeta vs.geeta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % SANGEETA GEETA RFA No.244/2016 24th July, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Udayan Jain, Mr. Amit and Mr. Kamal Sherawat Sharma, Advocates. versus ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) RFA2442016 and C.M. Appl. No.7894/2018 (for stay) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 19.12.2015 by which the trial court has rejected the plaint of the appellant/plaintiff under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. At the outset, I may note that the order though is said to have been passed by applying Order VII Rule 11 CPC, in reality the RFA No.244/2016 Page 1 of 8 order will have to be treated as one either under Order VII Rule 11 CPC or under Order XII Rule 6 CPC.2. Appellant/plaintiff filed the subject suit for possession of an area o...
Purnangini Trehan vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2018
$~34 to 37 & 39 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"24th July, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 2699/2016 & Crl.M.A. 11579/2016 PURNANGINI TREHAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Chugh, Mr. Amit & versus Mr. Pankaj Pareek, Advs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for the ........ RESPONDENTS State. Mr. V.S. Panwar & Mr. Vikas Walia, Advs. for R-2. + CRL.M.C. 2729/2016 & Crl.M.A. 11672/2016 VIRENDER MOHAN TREHAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Chugh, Mr. Amit & versus Mr. Pankaj Pareek, Advs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for the ........ RESPONDENTS State. Mr. V.S. Panwar & Mr. Vikas Walia, Advs. for R-2. CRL.M.C. 2730/2016 & Crl.M.A. 11674/2016 VIRENDER MOHAN TERHAN Through: Mr. Rajesh Chugh, Mr. Amit & versus Mr. Pankaj Pareek, Advs. ........ Petitioner + Crl. M.C. No.2699/2016 & conn. Page 1 of 5 STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for the State. Mr. V.S. Panwar & Mr. Vi...
Shreyasen, & Anr. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2018
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 24, 2018 + W.P.(C) 7444/2018, C.M. APPL. No.28499/2018 SHREYASEN, & ANR. ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: Ms. Tripti Poddar, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Amrita Prakash, CGSC with Mr. Harishankar Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Senior Standing Counsel for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA ORDER % S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) The petitioners are claiming directions that they should be permitted to file Income Tax returns for AY20172018 without complying with the condition of providing Aadhar Card registration number or Aadhar Card Enrolment number and a direction of the similar kind is sought thereby directing the CBDT to rely on its notification dated 30.06.2018. The petitioner relies upon the order of this court dated 14.05.2018 (W.P. (C) No.3212/2018 Mukul Talwar vs. Union of India & Ors. and connected ...
Akashdeep & Ors. Vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2018
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 2373/2018 Judgment delivered on:24. 07.2018 AKASHDEEP & ORS. ........ Petitioners versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr.R.P.S.Bhatti, Adv. Ms.Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Ajay Swami, P.S.M.S.Park. Mr.Rajesh Kumar Passey, Adv. with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2407.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.8465/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 2373/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.200 of 2014 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC at Police Station Mansarovar Park, Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged CRL.M.C. 2373/2018 Page 1 of 3 consequent to a matrimonial discord.2. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes and have amicably...
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.pappu & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: July 24, 2018 (i) + MAC.APP. 946/2016 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD PAPPU & ORS. Through: Mr. M.P. Sahi, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. Bhupinder Narula, Advocate for respondents-Claimants (ii) + MAC.APP. 948/2016 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. PAPPU & ORS. Through: Mr. M.P.Sahi, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. Bhupinder Narula, Advocate for respondent-Injured (iii) + MAC.APP. 949/2016 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.P.Sahi, Advocate MAC.APP. 946/2016 MAC.APP.948/2016 MAC.APP. 949/2016 MAC.APP. 950/2016 Page 1 of 12 PAPPU & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Versus Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. Bhupinder Narula, Advocate for respondent-Injured (iv) + MAC.APP...
M/S Economic Transport Organization Ltd vs.m/s Multimax Engineering Wo ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2018
$~C-28 * % + CO.PET. 556/2013 Date of Decision:24. 07.2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI M/S ECONOMIC TRANSPORT ORGANIZATION LTD Through : Mr. Faheem Shah, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus M/S MULTIMAX ENGINEERING WORKS PVT LTD Through : Mr. Ranjit Khatri and Ms. Sonam Bharti, Advocates ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH , J.(Oral) CA No.825/2018 In compliance with the last order of this court dated 15.03.2018, Mr.Ravi Prakash Aggarwal, the Managing Director of the respondent company has placed on record an affidavit along with an application being CA No.825/2018 seeking condonation of delay of 01 day in filing the accompanying affidavit. The application is allowed and the delay of one day in filing the accompanying affidavit is condoned. The affidavit is taken on record. CO.PET. 556/2013 1. This petition is filed under Sections 433 (e), (f), 434 and 439 of the CO. PET. 556/2013 Page 1 of 6 Companies Act, 1956 seeking to wind up the respond...
Sandeep Vishwakarma @ Gowardhan vs.nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2018
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN.1655/2017 Judgment delivered on:24. 07.2018 SANDEEP VISHWAKARMA @ GOWARDHAN.....Petitioner versus NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Akhilesh Pradhan, Advocate. Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State. SI Yogesh Kumar & SI Pankaj Kumar, PS Pul Prahlad Pur. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2407.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.319/2016 under Sections 186/353/307/395/397/398/5IPC and Sections 25/27/Arms Act, Police Station Pul Prahlad Pur.2. Charge sheet has been filed and charge against the petitioner has been framed under Sections 186/3IPC. The allegations in the FIR are that the secret information has been received that some people were going to commit dacoity in a factory. On the information a raiding party was prepared. They intercepted one Maruti Swift Car and a Honda City Car and BAI...
Dinesh Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 236/2002 DINESH KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma, Advocate with STATE Ms. Preeti Jakhar, Advocate. versus Through: Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % JUDGMENT2407.2018 1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 11th October 2001 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi in Sessions Case No.245/1996 arising out of FIR No.718/1995 registered at Police Station (PS) convicting the Appellant for the offence under Sectionsof the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The appeal is also directed against the order on sentence dated 15th October 2001 whereby the Appellant was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life along with a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine to suffer simple imprisonment (SI) for three years for the offence under Section 302 IPC and to 1 year rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.500/- and in default of pa...
Suresh Garodia vs.om Parkash
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:16. h July, 2018 Pronounced on:24. h July, 2018 + EX.P. 267/2001 & EA (OS) 860/2016 SURESH GARODIA ..... Decree Holder Through : Mr.Rajesh Gupta, & Mr.Pranjal Saran, Advocates. versus OM PARKASH ..... Judgement Debtor Through : Mr.Satish Pandey & Ms.Prabha with in person on Kushwaha, judgment debtor execution of bailable warrants. Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The money suit No.307 of 1998 was decreed by the Court of Civil Judge (Sr. Division) No.3, Guwahati, for a sum of Rs.14,75,047/- with interest at the rate of 15% per annum besides costs of the suit.2. The said decree was not executable within the jurisdiction of the Ld.Civil Judge (Sr. Division) No.3, Guwahati, hence on an application by the decree holder the learned Court had passed orders under Order XXI Rule 6 CPC and issued a certificate of non-satisfaction of decree and a letter- transmitting decree for execution addressed to ...
Puranangini Trehan vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2018
$~34 to 37 & 39 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"24th July, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 2699/2016 & Crl.M.A. 11579/2016 PURNANGINI TREHAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Chugh, Mr. Amit & versus Mr. Pankaj Pareek, Advs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for the ........ RESPONDENTS State. Mr. V.S. Panwar & Mr. Vikas Walia, Advs. for R-2. + CRL.M.C. 2729/2016 & Crl.M.A. 11672/2016 VIRENDER MOHAN TREHAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Chugh, Mr. Amit & versus Mr. Pankaj Pareek, Advs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for the ........ RESPONDENTS State. Mr. V.S. Panwar & Mr. Vikas Walia, Advs. for R-2. CRL.M.C. 2730/2016 & Crl.M.A. 11674/2016 VIRENDER MOHAN TERHAN Through: Mr. Rajesh Chugh, Mr. Amit & versus Mr. Pankaj Pareek, Advs. ........ Petitioner + Crl. M.C. No.2699/2016 & conn. Page 1 of 5 STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for the State. Mr. V.S. Panwar & Mr. Vi...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »