Akashdeep & Ors. Vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Akashdeep & Ors. vs State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Jul 24, 2018

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1216388

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1216388
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Jul 24, 2018
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Akashdeep & Ors.

Respondent

State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Excerpt

.....per the settlement, a total sum of rs. 2,00,000/- was agreed to be paid to respondent no.2. the amount of rs. 1,40,000/- has already been paid to respondent no.2. the balance amount of rs.60,000/- has been paid by way of pay order no.009011 dated 23.07.2018 drawn on axis bank ltd.4. respondent no.2 who is present in court in person and represented by counsel, is identified by the investigating officer. she confirms that she has received the entire sum of rs. 2,00,000/- from the petitioners. respondent no.2 submits that she has settled the dispute with the petitioners and is agreeable to the settlement and does not wish to press the criminal charges against the petitioners any further.5. in view of the fact that the disputes between the petitioners and respondent no.2 emanate out of a matrimonial discord and have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in crl.m.c. 2373/2018 page 2 of 3 futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. it would be expedient to quash the subject fir and the consequent proceedings emanating there from.6. in view of the above, the petition is allowed. fir no.200 of 2014 under sections 498a/4of the ipc at police station mansarovar park, delhi and the consequent proceedings there from are, accordingly quashed.7. order dasti under signatures of the court master. july24 2018 rk sanjeev sachdeva, j crl.m.c. 2373/2018 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 2373/2018 Judgment delivered on:

24. 07.2018 AKASHDEEP & ORS. ........ Petitioner

s versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS

Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: For the Respondent: Mr.R.P.S.Bhatti, Adv. Ms.Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Ajay Swami, P.S.M.S.Park. Mr.Rajesh Kumar Passey, Adv. with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2407.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) Crl.M.A.8465/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 2373/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.200 of 2014 under Sections 498A/4
of the IPC at Police Station Mansarovar Park, Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged CRL.M.C. 2373/2018 Page 1 of 3 consequent to a matrimonial discord.

2. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes and have amicably dissolved their marriage by mutual consent and decree of divorce dated 25.08.2017 has been passed. It is further submitted on behalf of the parties that parties had entered into the settlement before the Family Court, Karkardooma Courts, New Delhi on 25.08.2017.

3. As per the settlement, a total sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- was agreed to be paid to respondent No.2. The amount of Rs. 1,40,000/- has already been paid to respondent No.2. The balance amount of Rs.60,000/- has been paid by way of Pay Order No.009011 dated 23.07.2018 drawn on Axis Bank Ltd.

4. Respondent No.2 who is present in court in person and represented by counsel, is identified by the Investigating Officer. She confirms that she has received the entire sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- from the petitioners. Respondent No.2 submits that she has settled the dispute with the petitioners and is agreeable to the settlement and does not wish to press the criminal charges against the petitioners any further.

5. In view of the fact that the disputes between the petitioners and respondent No.2 emanate out of a matrimonial discord and have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in CRL.M.C. 2373/2018 Page 2 of 3 futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating there from.

6. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No.200 of 2014 under Sections 498A/4
of the IPC at Police Station Mansarovar Park, Delhi and the consequent proceedings there from are, accordingly quashed.

7. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. JULY24 2018 rk SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J CRL.M.C. 2373/2018 Page 3 of 3

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Akashdeep & Ors. vs State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr. Same Subject Land Acquisition