Delhi Court July 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rakesh Kumar vs.the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 205/2018 Judgment delivered on:26. 07.2018 RAKESH KUMAR versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Mr.Yogesh Swaroop, Adv. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms.Neelam Sharma, APP for State with SI Nitu Kumar, P.S.Geeta Colony. JUDGMENT2607.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.467/2017 under Sections 419/468/471/120B/34 of the IPC at Police Station Geeta Colony.2. Allegations against the petitioner in the FIR are that the co-accused is alleged to have told the complainant, subsequent to a raid by BSES officials that he would be in a position to have the matter settled with the BSES team. Thereafter the complainant is allegedly been approached by one Pankaj Dhawan who is alleged to have called up the petitioner over phone and made the petitioner speak to the complain...
Sartaj vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A.570/2018 & CRL. MB8252018 SARTAJ .....Appellant Through: Mr. K. Parameshwar, Advocate. versus STATE ....Respondent Through: Mr Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT2607.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 8th March, 2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, North-East District, Rohini Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.594arising out of FIR No.407/2016 registered at Police Station (PS) Jahangir Puri convicting the Appellant of the offence under Section 3of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the order on sentence dated 12th March, 2018whereby he was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment (RI) for life with a fine of Rs.5,000/-; and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment (SI) for one year.2. At the outset, it requires to be noticed that along with the present Appellant, his maternal uncle Salauddin was also sen...
Baljit Singh vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
$~R18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 399/2003 BALJIT SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sacchin Puri, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Varun Tyagi, Mr. Bharat Gupta and Mr. Kamil Khan, Advs. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT2607.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal by Baljit Singh is directed against the judgment dated 17th April, 2003 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi convicting him for the offence under Section 3IPC for having caused grievous injuries to Dinesh Kumar (PW-7) and under Section 3IPC for having caused simple injuries to Pradeep Kumar (PW-3) and Sheela (PW-4). The appeal is also directed against the order on sentence dated 21st April, 2003 whereby for the offence Crl.A. 399/2003 Page 1 of 5 under Section 3IPC, the Appellant was sentenced to Rigorous Imprisonment (RI) for 3 years along with a fine of Rs....
Rajesh Kumar Kaim vs.uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
$~3 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of pronouncement:26. h July, 2018 + W.P.(C) 2042/2002 % 1. RAJESH KUMAR KAIM ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Jainendra Maldahiyar with Mr.J.N. Patel, Advs. versus UOI & ORS. Through: Mr.Mohinder Singh, Mr.Ankur Mr.Luvkesh ........ RESPONDENTS Goel Aggrawal, Advs. and CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner joined the Life Insurance Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the LIC) on 22nd February, 1988 as Assistant Administrative Officer. On 10th October, 1998, he was appointed as Deputy Director (Admn./Insurance).2. On 14th May, 1999, the petitioner resigned from the services of the LIC. On 22nd May, 1999, the petitioners resignation was accepted by the LIC and he was relieved from the said organisation, consequent whereupon, on 24th May, 1999, the petitioner joined the services of the Employees State Insurance Company (hereinafter referred to as ESIC).3. It appears that the petitioner applied, to the L...
Indoco Remedies Limited vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7597/2018 & CM No.29055/2018 INDOCO REMEDIES LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Vivek Chib, Ms Pracheta Kar, Mr Asif Ahmed, Ms Ruchira Goel, Mr Kushal Gupta, Mr Rajeev M. Roy, Mr Rajeev K. Pandey and Mr Shambhu Thakur, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms Maninder Acharya, ASG, Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr Vikram Aditya Singh, Mr Waize Ali Noor, Mr Sahil Sood, Mr Harshul Choudhary, Mr Viplav Acharya and Mr Prateek Danda, Advocates for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2607.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioner (hereafter IRL) has filed the present petition 1. impugning the notice dated 20.11.2017 (hereafter the impugned notice) issued by the National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (hereafter NPPA) W.P.(C) 7597/2018 Page 1 of 17 demanding a sum of 2,93,57,006/- (2,00,95,630/- towards the overcharged amount plus 92,61,376/- towards interest at the rate of 15% p.a) for the ...
Vikram & Ors. Vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
$~72 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3668/2018 Judgment delivered on:26. 07.2018 VIKRAM & ORS ........ Petitioners versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Malkhan Singh, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Baseer Singh, P.S.Mandir Marg. Mr.Alphi Chugh, Adv. for R-2. JUDGMENT2607.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.268 of 2014 under Sections 406/498A IPC, Police Station Mandir Marg, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.2. As per the settlement, a total sum of Rs. 5,40,000/- was agreed to be paid to respondent No.2. The amount of Rs. 3,40,000/- has already been paid to respondent No.2. The balance amount of CRL.M.C. 3668/2018 Page 1 of 3 Rs.2,00,000/- has been paid by way of Demand draft No.3033...
Anand Rao Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs.abb India Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
$-7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h July, 2018 O.M.P. (COMM.) 32/2016 & I.A. 1567/2016 ANAND RAO INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Aakash Sherwal, Mr. Faheem Shah, Mr. Rohan Sharma, Mr. Sidharth Agarwal and Mr. Apurv, Advs. versus ABB INDIA LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ekta K. Sikri and Mr. Junaid H. Nahvi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 12.10.2015 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the work of Designing, Installation and Commissioning of two Power Transformers for 220KV Station in two phases on turnkey basis awarded by the petitioner to the respondent.2. The work had been awarded by the petitioner to the respondent under the ...
Prem Kaur vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:26. h July, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3356/2015 & C.M.6012/2015 PREM KAUR Through: Mr.Ashwin Vaish, Mr.Vinod Pandey ........ Petitioner versus and Mr.Kunal Awana, Advts. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Manish Mohan, CGSC for UOI. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, standing counsel LAC/L&B with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. Ajay Verma, senior standing counsel for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks a direction to quash the notification bearing no.F(11)(17)/91 L&B/LA/6518 dated 28.04.1995 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short the Act) as also the notification bearing no.F.11(17)/91/L&B/LA/Pt.V/1285 dated 26.04.2013 issued under Section 6 of the Act.2. The necessary facts to be noticed for disposal of this writ petition are that the petitioner ...
Ajay @ Bhagira vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h July, 2018 + W.P.(CRL) 3607/2017 and Crl. M.A. No.21386/2017 (Stay) AJAY @ BHAGIRA ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. S.S. Singh, Advocate. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, Additional Standing Counsel for State with Inspector Manoj Sharma, SI Anuj Kumar, PS Mayur Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. A show cause notice dated 14th October, 2016 was issued against the petitioner under Section 50 of the Delhi Police Act, 1978 (in short DP Act) by the Additional DCP, East District, on the ground that the petitioner was engaged in the commission of crime involving offences punishable under Chapter V-A, X, XI, XVI, XIII of IPC, NDPS Act and Gambling Act and his movements and acts are causing and calculated to cause alarm, danger and harm to the person or property, there were reasonable grounds to believe that he engages or is likely to ...
Shamim Bano vs.jalaluddin
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h July, 2018. RSA1222017 SHAMIM BANO ..... Appellant Through: Appellant in person. Versus JALALUDDIN CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Through: Mr. M.A. Ansari, Adv. ..... Respondent This Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1. Code, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 3rd February, 2017 in RCA No.156/2016 of the Court of Additional District Judge-3 (ADJ), East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi]. of dismissal of First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC preferred by the appellant / plaintiff against the judgment and decree [dated 22nd April, 2014 in Suit No.158/2007 (Unique Case ID No.02402C0214072007) of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, District East, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi]. of dismissal, after full trial, of the suit filed by the appellant / plaintiff for recovery of Rs.2,02,800/- from the respondent / defendant.2. The appeal came up first before this Court on 2...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »