Vikram & Ors. Vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Vikram & Ors. vs The State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Jul 26, 2018

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1216447

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1216447
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Jul 26, 2018
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vikram & Ors.

Respondent

The State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Excerpt

.....has been passed. it is further submitted on behalf of the parties that parties had entered into the settlement before the counselling cell, family court, patiala house courts, new delhi dated 27.03.2018.4. learned counsels for the parties inform that other disputes between the parties have also been resolved and proceedings have been concluded on the basis of the subject settlement.5. respondent no.2 who is present in court in person and represented by counsel, is identified by the io. respondent no.2 submits that she has settled the dispute with the petitioners and is agreeable to the settlement and does not wish to press the criminal charges against the petitioners any further.6. in view of the fact that the disputes between the petitioner and respondent no.2 emanate out of a matrimonial discord and have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. it would be expedient to crl.m.c. 3668/2018 page 2 of 3 quash the subject fir and the consequent proceedings emanating there from.7. in view of the above, the petition is allowed. fir no.268 of 2014 under sections 406/498a ipc, police station mandir marg, and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are accordingly quashed.8. order dasti under signatures of the court master. july26 2018 rk sanjeev sachdeva, j crl.m.c. 3668/2018 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~72 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3668/2018 Judgment delivered on:

26. 07.2018 VIKRAM & ORS ........ Petitioner

s versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS

Mr.Malkhan Singh, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

s : For the... RESPONDENTS

: CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Baseer Singh, P.S.Mandir Marg. Mr.Alphi Chugh, Adv. for R-2. JUDGMENT2607.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.268 of 2014 under Sections 406/498A IPC, Police Station Mandir Marg, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.

2. As per the settlement, a total sum of Rs. 5,40,000/- was agreed to be paid to respondent No.2. The amount of Rs. 3,40,000/- has already been paid to respondent No.2. The balance amount of CRL.M.C. 3668/2018 Page 1 of 3 Rs.2,00,000/- has been paid by way of Demand draft No.303305 dated 24.07.2018 drawn on Central Bank of India.

3. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes and have amicably dissolved their marriage by mutual consent and decree of divorce dated 24.05.2018 has been passed. It is further submitted on behalf of the parties that parties had entered into the settlement before the Counselling Cell, Family Court, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi dated 27.03.2018.

4. Learned counsels for the parties inform that other disputes between the parties have also been resolved and proceedings have been concluded on the basis of the subject settlement.

5. Respondent No.2 who is present in court in person and represented by counsel, is identified by the IO. Respondent No.2 submits that she has settled the dispute with the petitioners and is agreeable to the settlement and does not wish to press the criminal charges against the petitioners any further.

6. In view of the fact that the disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.2 emanate out of a matrimonial discord and have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to CRL.M.C. 3668/2018 Page 2 of 3 quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating there from.

7. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No.268 of 2014 under Sections 406/498A IPC, Police Station Mandir Marg, and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are accordingly quashed.

8. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. JULY26 2018 rk SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J CRL.M.C. 3668/2018 Page 3 of 3

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Vikram & Ors. vs The State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr. Same Subject Land Acquisition