Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Geeta Biswas vs.namita Dass & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.334/2018 Reserved on:23. d April, 2018 Pronounced on:25. h April, 2018 GEETA BISWAS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate with Mr. S.A. Rao, Advocate and Mr. Saurabh Sharma, Advocate. versus NAMITA DASS & ANR. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ........ RESPONDENTS To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Nos.15670/2018 & 15672/2018 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M.s stand disposed of. C.M. No.15671/2018 (for condonation of delay) For the reasons stated in the application, delay in re-filing 2. the appeal is condoned. RFA No.334/2018 and C.M. No.15669/2018 (stay) C.M. stands disposed of.3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant no.1 in the RFA No.334/2018 Page 1 of 14 suit impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 16.1.2018 whereby the trial court has decreed the suit filed b...
Nalanda Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
$~67 TO70* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2162/2018 Judgment delivered on:25. 04.2018 NALANDA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS ........ Petitioners versus STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS % + + CRL.M.C. 2163/2018 NALANDA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS ........ Petitioners versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + CRL.M.C. 2164/2018 NALANDA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS ........ Petitioners versus ADVIK FINANCE & PROPERTIES PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + CRL.M.C. 2165/2018 NALANDA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS ........ Petitioners versus STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS CRL.M.C.2162/2018, 2163/2018, 2164/2018 & 2165/2018 Page 1 of 3 Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Sharma, Mr. Alok Kumar Singh & Mr. Rishabh Jain, Advocates For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : Mr. Arun Kumar Sharma, APP for the State. JUDGMENT2504.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.7691-7694/2018 (exemption)...
Sh. Umesh Kumar & Ors vs.sh. Umesh Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 25, 2018 W.P.(C) 4168/2018 & CM163592018 SH. UMESH KUMAR & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.N. Gupta and Mr. Asbhishek Vashisht, Advocates versus DELHI STATE HEALTH COMMISSION AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Mini PUshkarna, Standing Counsel with Ms. Swagata Bhuyan, Advocate and Ms. Mani Bhatia, SPM for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. P.S. Singh, Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey and Mr. Rajpal Singh, Advocates for respondent No.3-UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) By way of this petition, petitioners, who are contractual employees working in Delhi State Health Mission, seek implementation of order of 1st November, 2017.2. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 & 2 submits that the process to comply with the order of 1st November, 2017 is in progress and it would be expeditiously completed.3. In view of the stand taken as aforesaid, it is deemed appropriate to direct second respondent to ensure that comp...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-(C)-2 vs.m/s Aeren R Infrstructur ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
$~5 & 6 * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h April, 2018 ITA2352017 ITA2362017 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(C)-2 Through Mr.Sanjay Kumar and Mr.Rahul Chaudhary, Standing Counsels. ..... Appellant versus M/S AEREN R INFRSTRUCTURE LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Inder Paul Bansal and Mr.Vivek Bansal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1 Revenues appeals in these two cases question an order of the ITAT. The issue concerns the treatment of damages and compensation awarded to the assessee. The Assessment Officer (AO) rejected the assessees claim that these were towards capital receipts and ruled that they have fallen in the revenue stream. The CIT(A) rejected the assessees appeal. ITA2352017 & 236/2017 Page 1 of 7 2 The facts are that the assessee engages itself in the business of real estate and had entered into a consortium agreement with its associates wh...
Sudhir Vohra vs.registrar of Companies and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on - 09.01.2018. Date of Decision - 25.04.2018. + W.P.(C) 934/2012 & C.M. No.18315/2014 SUDHIR VOHRA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Amit Bhagat, Adv with Ms. Sonali Chopra, Adv. versus REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES AND ORS ..... Respondent Through Ms. Suparna Srivastava, CGSC with Mr. Tushar Mathur, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Milanka Chaudhary, Adv. with Mr. Siddarth Mehra, Adv. for BDP Design. Mr. Naseem R. Nath, Adv. with Mr. Abhimanyu Verma, Adv. for R-3. Mr. Sunil Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. H.S. Chandhoke, Mr. Prashant Mishra & Ms. Jomol, Advs. for R-6. Mr. Anish Dayal with Mr. SiddharthVaid & Ms. Rupam Sharma, Advs. for Intervener in C.M. No.14122/2013. + W.P.(C) 3975/2012 & C.M. Nos.4055/2013 & 15336/2017 ANIL KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Amit Bhagat, Adv. with Ms. Sonali Chopra, Adv. versus WP (C) No.934/2012& conn. Page 1 of 46 THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Ms. Anumi...
Mohinder Pal Singh vs.upender Paswan & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
$~3 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:25. 04.2018 FAO542018, C.M.No.5481/2018 MOHINDER PAL SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anoop Bagai, Senior Advocate with Mr. S.C. Varma and Mr. Narottam Vyas, Advocates. versus UPENDER PASWAN & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashish Upadhyay, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Siddharth Dutta, Advocate for R-2 & R-3. Mr. V.K. Singh and Ms. Manogya Singh, Advocates with SSO Paramjit Singh Bains for R-3/ESIC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) This appeal impugns an order dated 23.09.2016 passed by the learned 1. Commissioner under Employees Compensation Act, 1923 (the Act) granting compensation to the claimant-respondent No.1.2. The brief facts of the case are that Mr. Upender Paswan- respondent No.1, was employed with the appellant. During the course of his duties, on 15.02.2013, he suffered an injury resulting in amputation of his right wrist. FAO542018 Page 1 of 14 A claim for compensation w...
Badal & Ors. Vs.m/s Niranjan Proptech Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % BADAL & ORS. RFA No.178/2018 25th April, 2018 Through: Mr. Praveen Suri, Advocate. ..... Appellants Versus M/s NIRANJAN PROPTECH PVT. LTD. & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.16397/2018 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. Review Petition No.175/2018 (filed by appellants) 2. This review petition is filed by the appellants seeking review of the judgment passed by this Court on 22.2.2018 dismissing the first appeal filed under Section 96 CPC. By the review petition, review is prayed on the ground that a Division Bench of this Court has passed a judgment on 24.11.2004 whereby the notification of the urbanization with respect to the Village Bijwasan has been stayed and consequently it is argued that trial court has wrongly arrived at a RP No.175/2018 in RFA No.178/2018 Page 1 of 6 finding t...
Sahchi Mathur vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 25, 2018 W.P.(C) 4133/2018 & CM162602018 SAHCHI MATHUR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.S.S. Tiwari, Advocate versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Vibha Mahajan Seth, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) For the relief claimed in this petition, a Representation (Annexure A-1) was sent by petitioner to second respondent on 1st November, 2017. According to petitioners counsel, there is no response to the said Representation.2. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition with direction to second respondent to effectively consider petitioners Representation (Annexure A-1) by passing a speaking order thereon, within a period of six weeks. Let a response from fourth respondent be also obtained by second respondent before deciding the said Representation. The fate of the said Representation be conveyed by second respondent t...
Dr. Ing. h.c.f. Porsche Ag vs.pritam Gain & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
$~6 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 751/2018, IA No.3996/2018 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & IA No.3997/2018 (u/O XXVI R-9 CPC) DR. ING. H.C.F. PORSCHE AG. ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Anuradha Salhotra & Mr. Sumit Wadhwa, Advs. PRITAM GAIN & ORS Versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Ankur Kashyap, Ms. Khooshnum Davierwala & Mr. Hasan Murtaza, Advs. for D-1 to 3. Mr. Kabir Dixit, Adv. for D-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER2504.2018 IA No.3996/2018 (of the plaintiff u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC).1. The plaintiff has instituted this suit inter alia for permanent injunction to restrain the defendants no.1 to 3 viz. i) Pritam Gain, ii) Kach Gain, and, iii) Minoti Gain carrying on business in partnership in the name and style of Porshe Jewels and defendant no.4 Bodhi Brands Pvt. Ltd., all at Mumbai, from infringing the trade mark PORSCHE of the plaintiff and from passing off their business as that of the plaintiff.2. The suit came up first before this Court on 22...
In the Matter of Vinshee Coal Carriers (P) Limited (In vol.liqn.) Vs..
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
$~CP-33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:25. 04.2018 + CO.PET.11/2018 IN THE MATTER OF VINSHEE COAL CARRIERS (P) LIMITED (IN VOL.LIQN.) Mr.Deepak Anand, Adv. for OL ....... Petitioner Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956, (herein referred to as the Act) by the Official Liquidator (OL) for voluntary winding up of VINSHREE COAL CARRIERS (P) LIMITED (IN VOL. LIQN.) (hereinafter referred to as the said company) from the date of filing of the present petition.2. The said Company was incorporated under the provisions of the Act, with the Registrar of Companies (ROC), NCT of Delhi and Haryana at New Delhi on 13.08.1996 with an authorized capital of Rs. 10,00,000/- divided into 10,000 Equity Shares of Rs. 100/- each.3. A perusal of the petition shows that the registered office of the said company was within the territory of NCT of Delhi i.e. at C-1/1589, Vasa...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »