Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sh. Umesh Kumar & Ors vs.sh. Umesh Kumar & Ors

Sh. Umesh Kumar & Ors vs Sh. Umesh Kumar & Ors

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Apr 25, 2018
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1214528

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sh. Umesh Kumar & Ors

Respondent

Sh. Umesh Kumar & Ors

Excerpt

* + 1. in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of order: april 25, 2018 w.p.(c) 4168/2018 & cm163592018 sh. umesh kumar & ors ........ petitioners through: mr. s.n. gupta and mr. asbhishek vashisht, advocates versus delhi state health commission and ors. .....respondents through: ms. mini pushkarna, standing counsel with ms. swagata bhuyan, advocate and ms. mani bhatia, spm for respondents no.1 & 2 mr. p.s. singh, mr. santosh kumar pandey and mr. rajpal singh, advocates for respondent no.3-uoi coram: hon'ble mr. justice sunil gaur order (oral) by way of this petition, petitioners, who are contractual employees working in delhi state health mission, seek implementation of order of 1st november, 2017.2. learned counsel for respondents no.1 & 2 submits that the process to comply with the order of 1st november, 2017 is in progress and it would be expeditiously completed.3. in view of the stand taken as aforesaid, it is deemed appropriate to direct second respondent to ensure that compliance of order of 1st w.p.(c) 4168/2018 page 1 of 2 november, 2017 is made within a period of twelve weeks or so from today.4. so far as petitioners’ prayer to formulate a policy to absorb petitioners as regular employees or not to disengage petitioners’ service is concerned, it is deemed appropriate to permit petitioners to make a concise representation in this regard to second respondent within a period of two weeks from today. upon receipt of such a concise representation, second respondent shall pass a speaking order thereon, preferably within a period of twelve weeks or so, and convey its fate to petitioners within two weeks thereafter, so that petitioners may avail of the remedies as available in law, if need be.5. with aforesaid directions, this petition and the application are disposed of. copy of this order be given dasti to learned counsel for petitioners and second respondent. (sunil gaur) judge april25 2018 s w.p.(c) 4168/2018 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 25, 2018 W.P.(C) 4168/2018 & CM163592018 SH. UMESH KUMAR & ORS ........ Petitioner

s Through: Mr. S.N. Gupta and Mr. Asbhishek Vashisht, Advocates versus DELHI STATE HEALTH COMMISSION AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Mini PUshkarna, Standing Counsel with Ms. Swagata Bhuyan, Advocate and Ms. Mani Bhatia, SPM for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. P.S. Singh, Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey and Mr. Rajpal Singh, Advocates for respondent No.3-UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER

(ORAL) By way of this petition, petitioners, who are contractual employees working in Delhi State Health Mission, seek implementation of order of 1st November, 2017.

2. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 & 2 submits that the process to comply with the order of 1st November, 2017 is in progress and it would be expeditiously completed.

3. In view of the stand taken as aforesaid, it is deemed appropriate to direct second respondent to ensure that compliance of order of 1st W.P.(C) 4168/2018 Page 1 of 2 November, 2017 is made within a period of twelve weeks or so from today.

4. So far as petitioners’ prayer to formulate a policy to absorb petitioners as regular employees or not to disengage petitioners’ service is concerned, it is deemed appropriate to permit petitioners to make a concise Representation in this regard to second respondent within a period of two weeks from today. Upon receipt of such a concise Representation, second respondent shall pass a speaking order thereon, preferably within a period of twelve weeks or so, and convey its fate to petitioners within two weeks thereafter, so that petitioners may avail of the remedies as available in law, if need be.

5. With aforesaid directions, this petition and the application are disposed of. Copy of this order be given dasti to learned counsel for petitioners and second respondent. (SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE APRIL25 2018 s W.P.(C) 4168/2018 Page 2 of 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial