Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajesh Kumar vs.surender Kumar & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h April, 2018 CRL.L.P. 544/2016 RAJESH KUMAR Represented by: Mr. S.N. Gupta, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus SURENDER KUMAR & ANR. Represented by: ........ RESPONDENTS Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State Mr.Rajesh Pandey and Ms.Anuradha Pandey, Advocates for R-1 and R-2 with R-1 and R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. No.15568/2016 No ground is made out to permit petitioner to lead additional evidence. Application is dismissed. CRL.L.P. 544/2016 1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 13th July, 2016, whereby the learned ACMM acquitted the respondents in complaint case No.1for the offences punishable under Section 4IPC, petitioner/complainant has preferred the present leave petition.2. Factual matrix of the present case is that the petitioner filed an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. stating that he was in possession of one room on the ground floor of the property bearin...
Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Azadpur vs.jaswant Singh & An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
$~24 * % + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on:24. h April, 2018 RSA502014 AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE AZADPUR Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Mr. N. K. Singh and Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocates. ..... Appellant Versus JASWANT SINGH & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nitish Chaudhary for Mr. Chetan for Respondent Lokur, Advocate No.2/DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) This second appeal has impugned an order dated 10.12.2012 which had decreed the respondents/plaintiffs suit, whereby the appellant has been permanently restrained from building a boundary wall from point B to point C, as shown in the site plan, opposite the shop of the plaintiff at New Subzi Mandi, Azadpur, Delhi. The facts are that the respondent-plaintiff had been allotted a commercial shop ad-measuring 198 sq. ft, numbered as:1507. New Subzi Mandi, Azadpur, Delhi. It is one of 16 shops in a row, in the larger area known as New Subzi Mandi. The...
M/S Tops Security Ltd. Vs.raghunandan Choudhary
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2018
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:23. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) 4616/2015 & CM83572015 & 14511/2017 M/S TOPS SECURITY LTD. ....... Petitioner Through: Mr.K.C.Dubey, Advocate. versus RAGHUNANDAN CHOUDHARY ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ashwini K. Sakhuja, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has impugned the order dated 20.05.2014 passed by the Authority under Minimum Wages Act 1948/Deputy Labour Commissioner (South), Labour Department, Government of NCT of Delhi, by which the claim application filed by 71 workmen through the concerned union against the petitioner herein for non-payment of minimum wages for the period from October, 2012 to March, 2013, was allowed in exercise of its power conferred by clause (i) of sub-section (3) of Section 20 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (in short MW Act) and the petitioner management was directed to pay the W.P. (C) 4616/2015 Page 1 of 3 difference of minimum wages along with th...
Leena Bhattacharya vs.ring Midway Senior Secondary School & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 23, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3974/2018 & CMs 15694-95/2018 + W.P.(C) 3979/2018 & CMs 15701-02/2018 + W.P.(C) 4045/2018 & CMs 15965-66/2018 + W.P.(C) 4047/2018 & CMs 15969-70/2018 RIVA SINGH ANJU VERMA LEENA BHATTACHARYA USHA RAWAT Through: Mr. Khagesh B. Jha, Advocate .....Petitioners versus RING MIDWAY SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL & ORS Through: Mr.Gursharan Singh, Advocate with Mr. Baljit Singh, OSD, Zone-18, DOE .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. The grievance made in the above-captioned four petitions is that petitioners are not getting their salary from the month of September, 2017 and therefore, they are finding it difficult to survive. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that although the case of petitioners is at par with the case of petitioner in W.P.(C) 3815/2018 titled Prakash Dagar v Ring Midway Senior Secondary School & Ors. decided on 18th April, 2018 by this Court, but petitioners are...
Vinay Kumar Gupta vs.sudama Prasad Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2018
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. d April, 2018 + RFA8312016 VINAY KUMAR GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mahendra Bairwa, Advocate (M- 9810019309). versus SUDAMA PRASAD GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashish Virmani & Ms. Sukriti Gandhi, Advocates (M-9810631642). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) CM APPLs. 39261/2016 (Stay), 42134/2016, 26801/2017 in RFA8312016 and RFA ______/2018 (to be numbered) 1. The cross objections be registered as a separate RFA. The appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 16th March, 2016 by which the suit for possession filed by the Appellant/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff) was dismissed.2. The brief background of the suit is that the Plaintiff, Mr. Vinay Kumar Gupta claimed that his grandfather, Sh. Binodi Lal had purchased the suit property bearing no.11192 and 11212 situated at Mandir Marg, Dori Walan, Karol Bagh, New Delhi (hereinafter, suit property). The case of the Plaintiff is ...
Union of India & Ors. Vs.garg Associates
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI OMP (COMM) 229/2016 & IAs 13462-63/2017 Reserved on:2. d February, 2018 Date of decision :23. d April, 2018 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioners Through: Mr.Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr.Shailendra Kr. Mishra, Mr.Waize ali Noor, Mr.Prateek Dhanda and Mr.Saeed Qadari, Advs. Along with Mr.Anil Mehta, Ex. Engineer (Retd.) * + Versus GARG ASSOCIATES .... Respondent Through: Mr.Raman Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Dhiraj Mr. Mr.R.P.Singh, Sachdeva, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 17th April, 2015 and the Arbitral Award dated 19th May, 2015 passed by the Sole Arbitrator awarding certain claims in favour of the respondent.2. At the outset, it is noted that the order dated 17th April, 2015 was merely an order passed in the course of the arbitration proceedings and is not an Arbitral Award in terms of Section 31 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter ref...
Abdul Moid Khan vs.anjuman-e-haideri & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2018
$~27 & 28 * % + FAO4012012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:23. 04.2018 HAIDER KHAN (DECEASED) THR LRS Through: Mr. Shekhar Dasi, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus ANJUMAN-E-HAIDERI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Tasneem Ahmadi and Ms. Mahima Rathi, Advs. Mr. Mehmood Pracha, Mr. R.H.A. Sikander and Mr.Prateek Gupta, Advs. for R-2/Delhi Waqf Board. + FAO4032012 ABDUL MOID KHAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Shekhar Dasi, Advocate. versus ANJUMAN-E-HAIDERI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Tasneem Ahmadi and Ms. Mahima Rathi, Advs. Mr. Mehmood Pracha, Mr. R.H.A. Sikander and Mr.Prateek Gupta, Advs. for R-2/Delhi Waqf Board. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) CM Nos. 12861/2017 (by R-1 for extension of time), 12937/2017 (by R-1 for vacation of orders dt. 12.09.2012 & 17.12.2013), 40267/2017 (by R-1 for vacation of order dt. 12.09.2012) and 6821/2018 (for modification of order dt. 17.12.2013 and substitution of arbitrator...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs.m. S. Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI INCOME TAX APPEAL No.169/2005 Reserved on :1st November, 2017 Date of decision:23rd April, 2018 + % THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ......Appellant Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Shahrukh Ejaz and Mr. Prashant Bhargava, Advocates for the Income Tax Department. Versus M. S. AGGARWAL .....Respondent Through Mr. Salil Kapoor, Mr. Sanat Kapoor, Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Ms. Soumya Singh and Mr. Sumit Lal Chandani, Advocates. INCOME TAX APPEAL No.895/2008 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ......Appellant Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Shahrukh Ejaz and Mr. Prashant Bhargava, Advocates for the Income Tax Department. Versus M. S. AGGARWAL .....Respondent Through Mr. Salil Kapoor, Mr. Sanat Kapoor, Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Ms. Soumya Singh and Mr. Sumit Lal Chandani, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ITA No.169/2005+connected appeal Page 1 of 77 SANJIV KHANN...
Riva Singh vs.ring Midway Senior Secondary School & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 23, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3974/2018 & CMs 15694-95/2018 + W.P.(C) 3979/2018 & CMs 15701-02/2018 + W.P.(C) 4045/2018 & CMs 15965-66/2018 + W.P.(C) 4047/2018 & CMs 15969-70/2018 RIVA SINGH ANJU VERMA LEENA BHATTACHARYA USHA RAWAT Through: Mr. Khagesh B. Jha, Advocate .....Petitioners versus RING MIDWAY SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL & ORS Through: Mr.Gursharan Singh, Advocate with Mr. Baljit Singh, OSD, Zone-18, DOE .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. The grievance made in the above-captioned four petitions is that petitioners are not getting their salary from the month of September, 2017 and therefore, they are finding it difficult to survive. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that although the case of petitioners is at par with the case of petitioner in W.P.(C) 3815/2018 titled Prakash Dagar v Ring Midway Senior Secondary School & Ors. decided on 18th April, 2018 by this Court, but petitioners are...
Dr. Kuldeep Ahuja vs.university of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 23, 2018 + W.P.(C) 4035/2018 & CM159502018 DR. KULDEEP AHUJA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Swetank Shantanu, Mr. Pratap Shanker and Ms. Surabhi, Advocates Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S.Rupal, Mr. Prang Newmai & Ms. Slomita Rai, Advocates for respondent No.1 Mr. Anurag Mathur, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mr. Apoorv Kurup & Ms. Isha Mital, Advocate for respondent No.3- UGC Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, CGSC & Mr. Kanish Arora, Advocate for respondent No.4-UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) On the subject of retirement age of Instructors in Stenography and 1. Typewriting, respondent-College had send a Communication to respondent-University Grants Commission (UGC) on 31st May, 2017 (Annexure P-24) and in the said Communication, respondent-UGC was urged to reconsider the matter of retirement age of Instructors in Stenography and Typewriting and to fix their age...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »