Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Riva Singh vs.ring Midway Senior Secondary School & Ors

Riva Singh vs Ring Midway Senior Secondary School & Ors

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Apr 23, 2018
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1214435

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Riva Singh

Respondent

Ring Midway Senior Secondary School & Ors

Excerpt

.....matter of these petitions is identical, therefore, with consent of learned counsel for the parties, these petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.4. since the case of petitioners appears to be at par with the case of prakash dagar, referred to above, therefore, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of these petitions with direction to respondent-school to consider composite application of 31st october, 2017 made by petitioners and similarly placed persons seeking release of their salary from the month of september, 2017 onwards and to pass speaking order on the said composite application within a period of three weeks from today and convey its outcome to petitioners within a week thereafter, so that petitioners may avail of the remedies as available in law, if need be. respondent-directorate of education shall promptly act under sub- section 4 of section 24 of the delhi school education act, 1973 after giving an opportunity of hearing to respondent-school and intimate outcome of the action taken to petitioners, within a period of six weeks.5. with aforesaid directions, above-captioned four petitions and the applications are disposed of. copy of this order be given dasti to learned counsel for the parties. (sunil gaur) judge april23 2018 s w.p.(c) 3974/2018 & connected matters page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 23, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3974/2018 & CMs 15694-95/2018 + W.P.(C) 3979/2018 & CMs 15701-02/2018 + W.P.(C) 4045/2018 & CMs 15965-66/2018 + W.P.(C) 4047/2018 & CMs 15969-70/2018 RIVA SINGH ANJU VERMA LEENA BHATTACHARYA USHA RAWAT Through: Mr. Khagesh B. Jha, Advocate .....Petitioners versus RING MIDWAY SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL & ORS Through: Mr.Gursharan Singh, Advocate with Mr. Baljit Singh, OSD, Zone-18, DOE .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER

(ORAL) 1. The grievance made in the above-captioned four petitions is that petitioners are not getting their salary from the month of September, 2017 and therefore, they are finding it difficult to survive. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that although the case of petitioners is at par with the case of petitioner in W.P.(C) 3815/2018 titled Prakash Dagar v Ring Midway Senior Secondary School & Ors. decided on 18th April, 2018 by this Court, but petitioners are not in a position to make fresh Representations and so, respondents be directed to decide petitioners’ application of 31st October, 2017 vide which petitioners had sought salary from the month of September, 2017 onwards. W.P.(C) 3974/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 2 2. Despite service of advance notice, none appears on behalf of respondent-School.

3. Since subject matter of these petitions is identical, therefore, with consent of learned counsel for the parties, these petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

4. Since the case of petitioners appears to be at par with the case of Prakash Dagar, referred to above, therefore, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of these petitions with direction to respondent-School to consider composite application of 31st October, 2017 made by petitioners and similarly placed persons seeking release of their salary from the month of September, 2017 onwards and to pass speaking order on the said composite application within a period of three weeks from today and convey its outcome to petitioners within a week thereafter, so that petitioners may avail of the remedies as available in law, if need be. Respondent-Directorate of Education shall promptly act under sub- Section 4 of Section 24 of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 after giving an opportunity of hearing to respondent-School and intimate outcome of the action taken to petitioners, within a period of six weeks.

5. With aforesaid directions, above-captioned four petitions and the applications are disposed of. Copy of this order be given dasti to learned counsel for the parties. (SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE APRIL23 2018 s W.P.(C) 3974/2018 & connected matters Page 2 of 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial