Chandra Devi vs.state of Nct of Delhi

Chandra Devi vs State of Nct of Delhi

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Feb 16, 2018

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1212839

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1212839
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Feb 16, 2018
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chandra Devi

Respondent

State of Nct of Delhi

Excerpt

$~7 * in the high court of delhi at new delhi % + bail appln. 72/2018 judgment delivered on:16. 02.2018 chandra devi versus state of nct of delh ........ petitioner ..... respondent mr. pramod kumar dubey, mr amit rathore and mr saurabh kumar, advocates. ms. anita abraham, app for the state. si pardeep singh, ps mahendra park. advocates who appeared in this case: for the... petitioner : : for the respondent coram: hon'ble mr. justice sanjeev sachdeva % order1602.2018 sanjeev sachdeva, j.(oral) 1.... petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case fir no.397/2017 under sections 3ipc.2. the allegations are that the co-accused inflicted a knife injury on the victim at the instigation of the petitioner, the mother of the co-accused. bail appln. 72/2018 page 1 of 2 3. the petitioner was granted interim protection on 11.01.2018, subject to joining investigation. status report dated 13.02.2018 indicates that the petitioner did join investigation and appeared before the investigating officer on 12.01.2018 and 08.02.2018.4. the co-accused has already been admitted to bail by order dated 07.12.2017.5. in view of the above, in the event of the arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail by the investigating officer/arresting officer/sho concerned, on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of rs.25,000/- with surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the investigating officer/arresting officer/sho concerned.6. the petitioner shall not do anything, which shall prejudice either the investigation or the prosecution witnesses. the petition is disposed of accordingly. order dasti under signatures of the court master.7. 8. sanjeev sachdeva, j february16 2018/’sn’ bail appln. 72/2018 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 72/2018 Judgment delivered on:

16. 02.2018 CHANDRA DEVI versus STATE OF NCT OF DELH ........ Petitioner

..... Respondent Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Mr Amit Rathore and Mr Saurabh Kumar, Advocates. Ms. Anita Abraham, APP for the State. SI Pardeep Singh, PS Mahendra Park. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: : For the Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % ORDER

1602.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner

seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.397/2017 under Sections 3
IPC.

2. The allegations are that the co-accused inflicted a knife injury on the victim at the instigation of the petitioner, the mother of the co-accused. BAIL APPLN. 72/2018 Page 1 of 2 3. The petitioner was granted interim protection on 11.01.2018, subject to joining investigation. Status report dated 13.02.2018 indicates that the petitioner did join investigation and appeared before the Investigating Officer on 12.01.2018 and 08.02.2018.

4. The co-accused has already been admitted to bail by order dated 07.12.2017.

5. In view of the above, in the event of the arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail by the Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer/SHO concerned, on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer/SHO concerned.

6. The petitioner shall not do anything, which shall prejudice either the investigation or the prosecution witnesses. The petition is disposed of accordingly. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

7. 8. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J FEBRUARY16 2018/’Sn’ BAIL APPLN. 72/2018 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Chandra Devi vs State of Nct of Delhi Same Subject Criminal