Delhi Court December 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Delhi Transport Corporation vs.m/s Prabhatam Advertising Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
30 $~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 3363/2015 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate with Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocate ..... Plaintiff M/S PRABHATAM ADVERTISING PVT LTD Through: Mr. Sunil Chaudhary, Advocate with Mr. Garuav Rana, Advocate. ..... Defendant Date of Decision:20. h December, 2018 versus % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) O.As. 163-164/2018, I.As. 17570-17573/2018 1. Present appeals have been filed challenging the orders dated 14th August, 2018 and 18th September, 2018 passed by the learned Joint Registrar, whereby the right of the appellant-defendant to cross-examine the witnesses of the plaintiff was closed and the right of the appellant-defendant to lead evidence was closed respectively. The orders dated 14th August, 2018 and 18th September, 2018 are reproduced hereinbelow:-"Order Dated 14th August, 2018 Proceedings from 11:45 am to 12:52 pm. Evidence recorded from 12:35 pm to 12:50 pm Number...
Ombeer Singh @ Ombir Singh & Ors vs.state ( Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3199/2018 Date of Order: December 20, 2018 OMBEER SINGH @ OMBIR SINGH & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shailender & Mr. N.P.Singh, Advocates Versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with ASI Aman Kumar Respondent No.2 in person with Ms. Harshita Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.57/2016, under Sections 498A/4of IPC, registered at police station CAW Cell Nanakpura, New Delhi is sought by petitioners on the basis of mediated settlement of 1st February, 2017 (Annexure P-2).2. Upon notice, Mr. Izhar Ahmed, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2, is present in the Court and she has been identified to be the complainant of FIR in question by ASI Aman Kumar.3. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the terms of settlement 1st February, 2...
Biswajit Das vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
$~ * + Through: Mr.Abhinav, Advocate ..... Appellant BISWAJIT DAS versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) No.9410/2014 Date reserved :22. d November 2018 Date pronounced :20thDecember 2018 ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Suparana Srivastava, CGSC with Ms. SanjnaDua, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Zoheb Hossain, Sr. St. Counsel with Mr.Piyush Goyal, Adv. for R2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.The petitioner is an Advocate practising in Delhi. By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner impugns the constitutional validity of Section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) and also seeks quashing of the fee imposed upon the petitioner as an assessee by the tax department and upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). W.P. (C) 9410/2014 page 1 of 18 2. Section 234E of the Act reads as under:-"(1) Without prejudice to the p...
Sumit Kumar Verma vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
* + + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 20, 2018 CRL.A. 753/2018 CRL.A. 902/2018, Crl.M.(Bail) 1383/2018 RANJEET @ RANA SUMIT KUMAR VERMA ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sanket Gupta, Advocate for Appellant in Crl.A. 753/2018 Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, Advocate for Appellant in Crl.A. 902/2018 versus ..... Respondent STATE Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public in Crl.A. Prosecutor for State 753/2018 Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State in Crl.A. 902/2018 SI Vikram Singh, P.S. Karawal Nagar, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) The above captioned two Appeals arise out of F.I.R. No.109/2013 under Sections 392/394/397/4I.P.C. registered at Police Station Karawal Nagar.2. In pursuance to the last order, appellants are present in the Court. Vide impugned judgement of 31st March, 2018 and order on sentence of Crl.A. 753/2018 & connected matter Page 1 of 2 6th April 2018, appellants have been convicted and sentenced to unde...
Jai Prakash Sharma & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 20, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 5942/2018 1. JAI PRAKASH SHARMA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rakesh Sharma, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Shailendra Kumar Singh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.220/2016, under Sections 498A/4IPC, registered at police station Gokul Puri, North-east District, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 18th April, 2018.2. Mr. Izhar Ahmed, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant of FIR in question by SI Shailendra Kumar Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by her.3. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the terms of CRL.M.C. 5942/2018 Page 1 of 3 Memorandum of Unde...
Shyam Kali &Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
$~20 & 21 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 501/2002 Decided on:20. h December, 2018 SHYAM KALI &ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mohd. Nasir Tabrez and Mr. J.Alam, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP with SI Ranjit Singh + CRL.A. 502/2002 SANJAY ..... Appellant Through: Mohd. Nasir Tabrez and Mr. J.Alam, Advocates versus STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP with SI Ranjit Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. These appeals brought a challenge to the judgment of the court of Sessions and order passed in its wake whereby the appellants were Crl.A501502/2002 Page 1 of 21 held guilty on charge of having subjected the victim to cruelty in matrimonial home, one of them being also convicted for the offence of dowry death and punishments awarded for the same.2. Santosh Kumari, daughter of Ram Dulare (PW6), a retired employee of Delhi Electricity Supply Undertakin...
Rajinder @ Jinder vs.state (Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 336/2017 Reserved on: October 26, 2018 Date of decision: December 19, 2018 1. JOGINDER @ DANNY2 VINOD JATAV Appellants Through: Mr. Hemant Gulati, Advocate Mr. Aditya Madaan. Advocate versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ... Respondent % + Through: ASC Sanjay Lao with Mr. Hirein Sharma, Advocate for State of NCT of Delhi + CRL.A. 515/2017 3. RAJINDER @ JINDER Appellant Through: Mr. M. N. Dudeja, Advocate Mr. Jitendra Sethi, Advocate versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ... Respondent Through: ASC Sanjay Lao with Mr. Hirein Sharma, Advocate for State of NCT of Delhi CRL.As. 336/2017 & 515/2017 Page 1 of 58 CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I.S. Mehta, J.: JUDGMENT1 The Appellants have preferred two separate appeal i.e. (Crl. A. 336/2017 & Crl. A. 515/2017) under Section 374 Read with Section 482 Cr.P.C., against a common judgment and order on sentence dated 22.02.2017 and 28.02.2017 respectively by which all the Appellants have been convicted ...
Rajvir Singh Atal vs.jagdish Prasad & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2018
$~11 to 13 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 6287/2014 versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ravi Prakash Gupta, Advocate. Mr.Harsh Ahuja, Advocate for UOI. Ms.Mrinalini Sen, Standing Counsel for DDA with Ms.Kritika Gupta & Mr.Tanmay Yadav, Advocates. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for L&B /LAC. Through: Ms.Monica Arora, CGSC with KARTAR SINGH & ORS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. + W.P.(C) 6297/2014, CM No.15208/2014 & CM No.20431/2014 RAJVIR SINGH ATAL & ORS UNION OF INDIA & ORS + CONT.CAS(C) 212/2015, CM No.4631/2015 & CM No.10049/2015 Through: Mr.Vikas Mahajan, CGSC for UOI. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for L&B /LAC. Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel for DDA with Ms.Gauri Chaturvedi & Ms.Mrinalini Sharma, Advocates. Through: Mr.Ravi Prakash Gupta, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners versus RAJVIR SINGH ATAL ........ Petitioner WP(C) 6287& 6297/2014and Cont. Cas (C) 212/2015 Page 1 of 19 versus JAGDISH PRASAD & ORS Through: Mr.Ra...
Ashok Rajan Agarwal vs.the State and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2018
* + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 19, 2018 CRL.M.C. 2079/2017 CRL.M.C. 2080/2017 CRL.M.C. 2081/2017 SACHIN KUMAR ASHOK RAJAN AGARWAL RINKI GUPTA Through: Mr. Kawal Nain and Mr. Rohit .....Petitioners Dadwal, Advocates versus THE STATE AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Manish Sharma, Mr. Prnay Raj Singh, Advocates for respondents 2 to 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned three petitions, the challenge is to the impugned order of 30th January, 2017 vide which petitioners revision petitions have been dismissed by observing that the rejection of petitioners prayer under Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C is justified, as no Crl.M.C. 2079-81/2017 Page 1 of 3 evidence is required to be collected by the police and the matter is pending before the trial court for recording of pre-summoning evidence. At the out...
Brijesh Yadav vs.bijender Kumar Kaushik
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2018
$~57 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:19. 12.2018 C.R.P. No.280/2018 BRIJESH YADAV ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. D.V. Khatri, Adv. Versus BIJENDER KUMAR KAUSHIK ....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL CM No.53470/2018 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.R.P. No.280/2018 & CM No.53469/2018 2. The impugned order dated 27.10.2018 passed by the court of learned District & Sessions Judge, North-West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi, (DJ) in Civil Suit No.2dismissing the application of the petitioner/defendant under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), is the subject-matter of challenge in this petition.3. A civil suit for recovery of Rs.6,80,000/- was filed by the respondent/plaintiff against the petitioner on the ground that he transferred a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- through RTGS in the account of the C.R.P. No.280/2018 Page 1 of 3 petitioner on 16.03.2015. The petitioner filed an applicat...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »