Delhi Court December 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Suresh & Anr. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 6164/2018 SURESH & ANR. Date of Order: December 20, 2018 .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with ASI Ram Kishan... RESPONDENTS No.2 & 3 in person with Mr. Shubham Gupta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR1 Quashing of ORDER (ORAL) FIR No.2442/2015, under Sections 509/354(B)/506/34/354 IPC, registered at police station Mehrauli, New Delhi is sought on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to this incident has been now cleared.2. Mr. Izhar Ahmed, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondents No.2 & 3, present in the Court have been identified to be the complainant party of FIR in question by ASI Ram Kishan on the basis of identity proof produced by them.3.... RESPONDENTS No.2 & 3, present in the Court, submit that th...
Mukesh Modi vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
#10 & 11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:20. 12.2018 W.P.(CRL) 3842/2018 RAHUL MODI UNION OF INDIA & ORS W.P.(CRL.) 3843/2018 MUKESH MODI versus versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aditya Singla, Mr. Pallav Gupta and Mr. Adit Pujari, Advocates in W.P.(CRL.) 3843/2018 Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocate with Ms. Supriya Juneja, Ms. Chestha Jetley and Mr. Krishna Multani, Advocates in W.P.(CRL) 3842/2018 For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC, Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC, Ms. Tejaswita Sachdeva, Mr. Viplav Acharya, Mr. Harshul Chaudhary, Advocates Mr. Saud Ahmed, Joint Director, SFIO, Mr. P.C. Maurya, Mr. Prashant Baliyan and Mr. Ajeet Shrivastava, SFIO Officers W.P.(CRL.) 3842/2018 & 3843/2018 Page 1 of 23 CORAM: HON'BLE MR...
Sh. Manoj Sharma vs.state Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
$~26 & 27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + BAIL APPLN. 1813/2017 & Crl.M.A.48936/2018 Judgment delivered on:20. 12.2018 SHIV CHARAN SHARMA versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) BAIL APPLN. 1817/2017 ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner versus SH MANOJ SHARMA STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. SI Sandeep, Police Station North Rohini. Mr. S.A. Khan, Adv. for the Central Bank of India. Ms. Chanan Parwani with Mr. Samar Kachwaha, Advs for the complainant. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Adv. : ..... Respondent JUDGMENT2012.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL)... Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.296/2016 under Page 1 of 6 1. BAIL APPLN.1813/2017 & BAIL APPLN.1817/2017 Sections 420/120B IPC, Police Station North Rohini.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant is an owner of a property bearing No.G-23/183, ...
Brig Sanjay Puri vs.shweta Puri & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:20. h December, 2018 $~17 * % + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 279/2018, CM APPLs 44963-64/2018 CORAM: BRIG SANJAY PURI Through: Mr. Manoj Chouhan & Mr. Vikas Versus SHWETA PURI & ANR Through: Mr. Ujjwal Jain & Mr. Pranav Malhotra, Advocates. Nagpal, Advocates. ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL449642018 (delay of 107 days) 1. This is an application filed by the applicant/appellant seeking condonation of 107 days delay in filing the present appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 107 days in filing the appeal is condoned.2. The application stands disposed of. MAT.APP.(F.C.) 279/2018 3. The present appeal has been filed against the order dated 06.06.2018 passed by the Family Court on an application filed by the respondent/wife seeking rent.4. Some necessary facts, which are required to be noticed for disposal...
Naresh Kumar vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.M.C.6548/2018 NARESH KUMAR Date of Order: December 20, 2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Anuradha Yadav and Mr. Karamveer Singh, Advocates versus STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manjeet Singh Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Anil Kumar, PS Neb Sarai. Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR1 ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.318/2015, under Section 135 of Indian Electricity Act, 2003 registered at police station Neb Sarai, Delhi is sought in this petition.2. Quashing of aforesaid FIR is sought on the basis of No Dues Certificate of 2nd August, 2018 (Annexure C) issued by respondent No.2/complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question.3. Notice.4. Mr. Manjeet Singh Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice. Crl.M.C. 6548/2018 Page 1 of 3 5. Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate, appears on behalf of respondent No.2 and submits that the su...
Neetu & Ors. Vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 20, 2018 CRL.M.C. 5936/2018 NEETU & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.O.P.Aggarwal, Advocate Versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Rajinder CRL.M.C. 6156/2018 NAVEEN & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.O.P.Aggarwal, Advocate Versus STATE (GOVT O NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Rajinder CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. In the above captioned first petition, quashing of FIR No.910/2014, whereas in the above captioned second petition, quashing of FIR No.903/2014, both registered at police station Malviya Nagar, New Delhi is sought. FIR No.910/2014 has been registered for offences under Sections 323/354/4IPC and FIR No.903/2014 has been registered for offences under Sections 323/354/506/5IPC. Both th...
Luxra Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs.indian Agricultural Research Institute ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
$~ 7 & 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:20. 12.2018 + W.P. (C) 8041/2018 + W.P. (C) 9274/2018 FRONTLINE (NCR) BUSINESS SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED LUXRA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner versus INDIAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Present:-"Mr. Saurabh Prakash, Mr. Kunal Gosain & Mr. Utsav for in petitioner Jain, Advs for petitioner in W.P. (C) 8041/2018. Mr. M.S. Vinaik, Adv. W.P.(C) 9274/2018. Mr. Gagan Mathur & Mr. Varun Kumar, Advs. for Respondent No.1 in W.P.(C) 8041/2018. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gogan & Mr. Perala Upendra Sai, Advs. for R-2 in W.P.(C) 8041/2018 & 9274/2018. Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr. Pawan Pathak, Adv. for R-3/UOI in W.P. (C) 9274/2018. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J (OPEN COURT) % 1. These two petitions concern the same tender for security services issued by the Indian Agricultural Research Institute [hereinafter referred to...
Sdl Auto Pvt. Ltd Through Its Director Shri h.s. Banga & Anr. Vs.commi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP (C) 7277/2015 Reserved on:06th September, 2018. Date of decision:20th December, 2018. SDL AUTO PVT. LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SHRI H.S. BANGA & ANR. ........ Petitioner COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, FARIDABAD, DELHI-IV & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. A.K. Prasad and Ms. Priyanka Goel, Advocates. versus Through Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Mr. Rajat Gava and Mr. Shravan Kumar Shukla, Advocates for CBEC. Mr. G. Tushar Rao, Advocate for UOI. WP (C) 8939/2015 ICEBERG AQUA PVT LTD & ORS. ........ Petitioner Through Mr. S.N. Thyagarajan, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Nitya Sharma, Advocate for Central Excise. WP(C) 10013/2016 K M G ROLLING PVT. LTD. & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Shubhankar Jha Mr. Akhil Krishan Maggo, Advocates. and WP(C) Nos. 7277/2015, 8939/2015 & 10013/2016 Page 1 of 62 versus COMMI...
Sonia Pasricha vs.rohit Duggal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:14. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:20. h December, 2018 + CM(M) 1019/2018, CM Appl.Nos.35339/2018, 35341/2018, 40748/2018 SONIA PASRICHA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajiv Talwar, Mr.B.K.Patra, and Mr.Sandeep Ms.Prabhkeen Kaur, Advocates Khatri versus ROHIT DUGGAL ..... Respondent and Through: Mr.Harshad V Hameed Mr.Muammed Siddick, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This petition challenges an order dated 04.08.2018 passed in a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC viz. CS No.150/2018 where the learned Trial Court while granting leave to defend to the petitioner has directed the petitioner to deposit 50% of the suit amount as a condition precedent for grant of such leave.2. The petitioner has duly complied with the deposit condition as directed. During the course of arguments the learned counsel for the petitioner has alleged the averments made in the plaint are highly improbable since the...
Ranjeet @ Rana vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
* + + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 20, 2018 CRL.A. 753/2018 CRL.A. 902/2018, Crl.M.(Bail) 1383/2018 RANJEET @ RANA SUMIT KUMAR VERMA ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sanket Gupta, Advocate for Appellant in Crl.A. 753/2018 Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, Advocate for Appellant in Crl.A. 902/2018 versus ..... Respondent STATE Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public in Crl.A. Prosecutor for State 753/2018 Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State in Crl.A. 902/2018 SI Vikram Singh, P.S. Karawal Nagar, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) The above captioned two Appeals arise out of F.I.R. No.109/2013 under Sections 392/394/397/4I.P.C. registered at Police Station Karawal Nagar.2. In pursuance to the last order, appellants are present in the Court. Vide impugned judgement of 31st March, 2018 and order on sentence of Crl.A. 753/2018 & connected matter Page 1 of 2 6th April 2018, appellants have been convicted and sentenced to unde...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »