Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Naresh Kumar vs.state & Anr

Naresh Kumar vs State & Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Dec 20, 2018
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1220195

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Naresh Kumar

Respondent

State & Anr

Excerpt

.....and so, the proceedings arising out of the fir in question be brought to an end. in „gian singh vs state of punjab‟ (2012) 10 scc303 supreme court has recognized the need of amicable resolution of disputes in cases like the instant one, by observing as under:-"“resolution of a dispute by way of a compromise between two warring groups, therefore, should attract the immediate and prompt attention of a court which should endeavour to give full effect to the same unless such compromise is abhorrent to lawful composition of the society or would promote savagery. where the high court quashes a criminal proceeding having regard to the fact that the dispute between the offender and the victim has been settled although the offences are not compoundable, it does so as in its opinion, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor.” 6. since the subject matter of this fir now stands mutually and amicably settled between parties, therefore, continuance of proceedings arising out of the fir in question would be an exercise in futility.7. accordingly, this petition is allowed and fir no 318/2015, under section 135 of indian electricity act, 2003 registered at police station crl.m.c. 6548/2018 page 2 of 3 neb sarai, delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. this petition is accordingly disposed of. december20 2018 p‟ma (sunil gaur) judge crl.m.c. 6548/2018 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.M.C.6548/2018 NARESH KUMAR Date of Order: December 20, 2018 ........ Petitioner

Through: Ms. Anuradha Yadav and Mr. Karamveer Singh, Advocates versus STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manjeet Singh Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Anil Kumar, PS Neb Sarai. Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR1 ORDER

(ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.318/2015, under Section 135 of Indian Electricity Act, 2003 registered at police station Neb Sarai, Delhi is sought in this petition.

2. Quashing of aforesaid FIR is sought on the basis of No Dues Certificate of 2nd August, 2018 (Annexure C) issued by respondent No.2/complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question.

3. Notice.

4. Mr. Manjeet Singh Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice. Crl.M.C. 6548/2018 Page 1 of 3 5. Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate, appears on behalf of respondent No.2 and submits that the subject matter of this FIR stands amicably resolved between the parties and No Dues Certificate has been already issued by respondent No.2/complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and so, the proceedings arising out of the FIR in question be brought to an end. In „Gian Singh Vs State of Punjab‟ (2012) 10 SCC303 Supreme Court has recognized the need of amicable resolution of disputes in cases like the instant one, by observing as under:-

"“Resolution of a dispute by way of a compromise between two warring groups, therefore, should attract the immediate and prompt attention of a court which should endeavour to give full effect to the same unless such compromise is abhorrent to lawful composition of the society or would promote savagery. Where the High Court quashes a criminal proceeding having regard to the fact that the dispute between the offender and the victim has been settled although the offences are not compoundable, it does so as in its opinion, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor.” 6. Since the subject matter of this FIR now stands mutually and amicably settled between parties, therefore, continuance of proceedings arising out of the FIR in question would be an exercise in futility.

7. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and FIR No 318/2015, under Section 135 of Indian Electricity Act, 2003 registered at police station Crl.M.C. 6548/2018 Page 2 of 3 Neb Sarai, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. This petition is accordingly disposed of. DECEMBER20 2018 p‟ma (SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE Crl.M.C. 6548/2018 Page 3 of 3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial