Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Nov 28 2018

Ram Naresh & Ors vs.state (Delhi Admn.)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-28-2018

$~R-1 to 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. h September, 2018 Pronounced on:28. h November, 2018 CRL.A. 152/1996 SHAMBIR & ORS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav and Mr. Karan Dahiya, Advocates Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus Through:Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent STATE CRL.A. 154/1996 RAMJI LAL STATE CRL.A. 155/1996 RAM BALI STATE CRL.A. 156/1996 and Crl.M.A.8358/2014 ..... Appellant Page 1 of 79 + + + + SHIV LAKHAN Crl.A1521996 & connected + + + + STATE CRL.A. 157/1996 JOKHU STATE CRL.A. 158/1996 Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent UDAY PAL SINGH ..... Appella...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2018

Palanival vs.state (Delhi Admn)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-28-2018

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2018

State Bank of India vs.sbi Staff Residents Welfare Society & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-28-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on:19th November, 2018 Pronounced on:28th November, 2018 STATE BANK OF INDIA ..... Appellant LPA1102015 Through: Mr. Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar Sangal, Mr. Siddharth Sangal and Ms. Antara Rastogi, Advocates. SBI STAFF RESIDENTS WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, Ms. Srishti Gupta and Ms.Garima Sharma, Advocates for R-1. Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Advocate for DDA. Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla and Mr. Shashwat Sharma, Advocates for R- UOI. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J1 The present appeal under Clause X of Letters Patent Appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 18th February 2015 of the learned Single Judge passed in W.P.(C) 1509/2011 wherein the question of maintainability of the writ petition has been decided against the Appellant. LPA1102015 Page 1 of 19 Factual Background 2. The scope of the present appeal, though a ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2018

Abbott Healthcare Pvt Ltd vs.competition Commission of India & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-28-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h November, 2018 % + LPA6582018, CM Nos. 49071-49075/2018 ABBOTT HEALTHCARE PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Raj Shekhar Rao, Mr. Aashish Gupta, Mr. Aditya Mukherjee, Mr. Aman Sethi, Mr. Anirudh Lekhi and Ms. Anjali Kumar, Advs. versus COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: Mr. Samar Bansal, Mr. Manan ........ RESPONDENTS Shishodia and Ms. Devahuti Pathak, Advs. for CCI. Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) CM No.49073/2018 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. LPA6582018 1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant challenging the order dated November 13, 2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. (C) 12129/2018, whereby the learned LPA6582018 Page 1 of 12 Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition. The challenge i...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2018

Yash Pal vs.state (Nct of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-28-2018

$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 2003/2018 Judgment delivered on:28. 11.2018 YASH PAL versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Ms.Sangeeta Jain, Adv. Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with SI Kuldeep Bhati, P.S.Gazipur Mr.Rajat Wadhwa, Adv. for the complainant. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2811.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.262/2017 under Section 420/120B Police Station Ghazipur, East Delhi.2. Allegations are that the petitioner had entered into a collaboration agreement with a third party and thereafter had sought to transfer two flats, one of which was to be transferred to the complainant for a total consideration of Rs.32 lakhs. It is alleged that a sum of Rs.28 lakhs has been paid. The petitioner is alleged to have failed to execute the documents of transfer or title or to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2018

M/S. Living Media India Ltd. & Anr. Vs.government of National Capital ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-28-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: November 28, 2018 (i) + W.P.(C) 3167/2015 (ii) + W.P.(C) 6294/2016 & C.M. 25790/2016 (iii) + W.P.(C) 6295/2016 & C.M. 25792/2016 (iv) + W.P.(C) 6296/2016 & C.M. 25794/2016 & C.M. 25078/2017 (v) + W.P.(C) 6297/2016 & C.M. 25796/2016 (vi) + W.P.(C) 6298/2016 & C.M. 25798/2016 (vii)+ W.P.(C) 6300/2016 & C.M. 25802/2016 (viii)+ W.P.(C) 6301/2016 & C.M. 25804/2016 (ix) + W.P.(C) 6302/2016 & C.M. 25806/2016 (x) + W.P.(C) 6303/2016 & C.M. 25808/2016 M/S. LIVING MEDIA INDIA LTD. & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Puneet Kumar Verma, Advocate Versus (i) GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL OF (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x) TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS. SANJAY KUMAR AND ORS. CHANDAN KUAMR AND ORS. PRITHVIRAJ AND ORS. RAJU CHAUHAN AND ORS. SHASHIKANT MISHRA AND ORS. RAM KUMAR AND ORS. RAMESH PRASAD AND ORS. RAJENDER SINGH AND ORS. RAGHUBIR SINGH THAKUR AND ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. K. Viswanath, Advocate for responde...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2018

Jindal Itf Limited vs.ntpc Limited & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-28-2018

$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. 11.2018 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 363/2018 JINDAL ITF LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj K. Singh with Mr. Nilava Bandhyopdhay, Advs versus NTPC LIMITED & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Nikita Choukse, Adv CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.16177/2018 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 363/2018 2. Issue notice.3. Ms. Nikita Choukse accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.4. Learned counsel says that she does not wish to file a reply as she does not oppose the prayer made in the petition.5. I am informed by counsel for the parties that the matter has been reserved for pronouncement of award.6. Counsel for the parties say that the Arbitral Tribunal has requested that the time be extended till 31.01.2019. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 363/2018 page 1 of 2 7. Having regard to the record placed before me and the time and money invested...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2018