Skip to content


Jindal Itf Limited vs.ntpc Limited & Anr. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Delhi High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Jindal Itf Limited

Respondent

Ntpc Limited & Anr.

Excerpt:


$~38 * in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of decision:28. 11.2018 + o.m.p.(misc.)(comm.) 363/2018 jindal itf limited ........ petitioner through: mr. manoj k. singh with mr. nilava bandhyopdhay, advs versus ntpc limited & anr. ........ respondents through: ms. nikita choukse, adv coram: hon'ble mr. justice rajiv shakdher rajiv shakdher, j.(oral) i.a. no.16177/2018 (exemption) 1. allowed, subject to just exceptions. o.m.p.(misc.)(comm.) 363/2018 2. issue notice.3. ms. nikita choukse accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.4. learned counsel says that she does not wish to file a reply as she does not oppose the prayer made in the petition.5. i am informed by counsel for the parties that the matter has been reserved for pronouncement of award.6. counsel for the parties say that the arbitral tribunal has requested that the time be extended till 31.01.2019. o.m.p.(misc.)(comm.) 363/2018 page 1 of 2 7. having regard to the record placed before me and the time and money invested by the parties, i am inclined to allow the prayer. therefore, time for pronouncing and publishing the award is extended till 31.01.2019.8. the petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. rajiv sh

Judgment:


$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:

28. 11.2018 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 363/2018 JINDAL ITF LIMITED ........ Petitioner

Through: Mr. Manoj K. Singh with Mr. Nilava Bandhyopdhay, Advs versus NTPC LIMITED & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS

Through: Ms. Nikita Choukse, Adv CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.

(ORAL) I.A. No.16177/2018 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 363/2018 2. Issue notice.

3. Ms. Nikita Choukse accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

4. Learned counsel says that she does not wish to file a reply as she does not oppose the prayer made in the petition.

5. I am informed by counsel for the parties that the matter has been reserved for pronouncement of award.

6. Counsel for the parties say that the Arbitral Tribunal has requested that the time be extended till 31.01.2019. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 363/2018 page 1 of 2 7. Having regard to the record placed before me and the time and money invested by the parties, I am inclined to allow the prayer. Therefore, time for pronouncing and publishing the award is extended till 31.01.2019.

8. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J NOVEMBER28 2018 c O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 363/2018 page 2 of 2


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //