Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Court on Its Own Motion vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
$- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:10. 10.2018 Judgment delivered on:13. 11.2018 CRL.REF.1/2018 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION ........ Petitioner STATE Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma, Amicus Curiae versus with Ms. Preeti Jakhar, Advocate. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Adv for the State . Mr Rajat Katyal, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The present is a reference received from the learned CMM (North West), Rohini Courts, Delhi under section 395(2) Cr PC.2. Before setting out the questions of law raised by the learned CMM, we may set out the background in which the said questions of law have been referred for decision of this Court. Nitin Kumar Aggarwal is one of the accused in case FIR1362013, PS EOW. His anticipatory bail application under section 438 Cr PC was dismissed by this court on 30.05.2017. Crl.Ref.1/2018 Page 1 of 32 Despite t...
Satish Bhaskar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
$~5 & 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1952/2017 Judgment delivered on:13. 11.2018 + ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent AMRAVATI BHASKAR STATE versus BAIL APPLN. 2431/2017 SATISH BHASKAR STATE versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr.Santosh Singh Bagga, Adv. Ms.Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Mohd.Imteyaz Alam, P.S.Shahbad Dairy. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1311.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.493/2017, under BAIL APPLN. 1952/2017 & 2431/2017 Page 1 of 3 Section 323/354/365/506/509 IPC, Police Station Shahbad Dairy.2. Allegations in the FIR are that the complainant was sitting in her house on the stairs when the accused petitioners are alleged to have come and assaulted her and misbehaved with her.3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely i...
Abbott Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. Vs.competition Commssion of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
$~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12129/2018 & CM Nos. 47096-47098/2018 ABBOTT HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr Akhil Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr Naval Chopra, Mr Aashish CGupta, Mr Aditya Mukherjee, Mr Aman Sethi, Mr Anirudh Lekhi, Mr Anjali Kumar, Advocates. versus COMPETITION COMMSSION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr Samar Bansal, Mr Manan Shishodia, Ms Devahuti Pathak, Advocates for CCI/R1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1311.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 05.07.2017 passed by the Competition Commission of India (hereafter CCI) under Section 26 (1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter the Act), whereby the Commission has directed the Director General (hereafter the DG) to cause an investigation into the matter and submit an investigation report within sixty days from the receipt of the said order. The petitioner also impugns an order dated ...
Bharat Rail Automations Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
$~5 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. 11.2018 ARB.P. 446/2018 BHARAT RAIL AUTOMATIONS PVT. LTD. Through Ms. Madhumita Bhattacharjee and Mr. Vidur Kamra, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through Mr. ........ RESPONDENTS Jagjit Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Vipin Chaudhary, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.: (ORAL) 1 This is a petition filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short 1996 Act). The petitioner seeks appointment of an Arbitrator as despite a notice being issued to the respondents, the respondents have not appointed an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes arising between the parties. 2 Notice in this petition was issued on 01.06.2018, when, Mr. Jagjit Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel, entered appearance on behalf of the respondents. Mr. Singh had, on that date, taken an objection with regard to the maintainability of the petition on the ground that it was A...
Dharmender Kumar and Ors vs.agricultrual & Processed Food Development ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
$~50 * + W.P.(C) 8181/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved:30. h October, 2018 Pronounced on:13. h November, 2018 1. DHARMENDER KUMAR AND ORS Through : Mr. M.K. Bharddwaj, Advocate. ........ Petitioners Versus AGRICULTRUAL & PROCESSED FOOD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR Through : Ms. Jyoti Srivastava, Standing Counsel. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby JUDGMENT declaring the action of respondents in outsourcing the post of Peons/ MTS as illegal and direct the respondents to regularize the services of... Petitioners as peon/ MTS in the same manner in which other similarly placed contractual employees have been regularized. Further seeks direction thereby set aside thereby quashing the impugned action of respondents including letter dated 08.06.2017. Consequently, the respondents may be directed to treat the services of... Petitioners as regular from the date of appointment a...
K a Nagamani vs.national Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:13. 11.2018 + W.P.(C) 1746/2018 & C.M. No.7238/2018 K A NAGAMANI versus ........ Petitioner NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS :... Petitioner in person. : Mr Mrigank Prabhakar, Mr Shailesh Madiyal and Mr Sudhanshu Prakash. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 02.02.2018 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereafter NCDRC), whereby the petitioners applications, inter alia, questioning the jurisdiction of the NCDRC to entertain the Revision Petition preferred by the respondent no.2 (Karnataka Housing Board hereafter KHB) was rejected. The petitioner also impugns NCDRCs order dated 10.02.2017, whereby the Revision Petition preferred by the KHB against an order passed by the State Co...
Sushila Gopalan and Anr. Vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
$~21&22 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST.CAS. 53/2006 SUSHILA GOPALAN AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Manu Nayar, Ms. Meenakshi Bhatia and Ms. Maitreyee Joshi, Advs. + STATE Through: None. versus AND ..... Respondent TEST.CAS. 54/2006 SUSHILA GOPALAN & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Manu Nayar, Ms. Meenakshi Bhatia and Ms. Maitreyee Joshi, Advs. versus Through: None. STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER1311.2018 ..... Respondent IA No.10003/2018 (under Section 10 of the CPC), IA No.15360/2018 (u/S151f the CPC) and IA No.15361/2018 (u/S10of the CPC) in Test. Cas. No.53/2006. IA No.10000/2018 (under Section 10 of the CPC), IA No.15362/2018 (u/S151CPC) and IA No.15363/2018 (u/S10of the CPC) in Test. Cas. No.54/2006.1. The petitioner, in these Testamentary Cases seeking probate/letters of administration, with respect to (a) the documents dated 6th November, 2003 and 15th March, 1999 claimed to be the validly executed last Will of Sm...
Rama Kant Shah vs.shashi Bala Nagpal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:13. 11.2018 CM (M) No.1350/2018 & CM No.46340/2018 RAMA KANT SHAH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.J.C. Mahindro, Advocate with Mr.Shubham Agarwal, Advocate. versus Through: None. SHASHI BALA NAGPAL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ..... Respondent $~91 * % + 1. The impugned orders dated 17.08.2018 and 06.09.2018 passed by the court of learned Civil Judge-06, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (Trial Court) in Execution Petition No.228/2017, are the subject matter of challenge in this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.2. With the permission of the Court, the learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record a copy of the judgment dated 19.03.2014 in Civil Suit No.454/2006 which was decreed in favour of the respondent/Decree-Holder/plaintiff against the petitioner/judgment debtor/defendant for possession, permanent injunction, mesne profit/damages with regard to the property in question b...
Arvind Jatav vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 6085/2017 Through: Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan with Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus $~28 & 29 * + ARVIND JATAV UNION OF INDIA AND ORS + DEVENDRA SINGH UNION OF INDIA AND ORS CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Ms.Madhuri Dhingra, Advocate for R1 to R3. W.P.(C) 6242/2017 Through: Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan with Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Ms.Madhuri Dhingra, Advocate for R1 to R3. ORDER1311.2018 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The issue in both these petitions is a common one. It concerns the non- W.P.(C) 6085/2017 & W.P.(C) 6242/2017 Page 1 of 8 grant of House Rent Allowance (HRA) to the... Petitioners, who are working as Sub Inspectors with the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF).2. As far as Mr.Arvind Jatav the... Petitioner in W.P.(C) 6085 of 2017 is concerned, he wa...
Banwarilalji Agarwal & Ors. Vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
Judgment delivered on:13. 11.2018 BAIL APPLN. 358/2017 $~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BANWARILALJI AGARWAL & ORS STATE versus ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Ashish Kumar Bhagat and Mr.Pranay Sohini, Advs. For the Respondent : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms.Kusum Dhalla, Addl. PP for the State with SI Ajay Kumar, PS Rajouri Garden. JUDGMENT1311.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in. FIR No.600/2016, under Section 379/420/468/471/120-B Indian Penal Code, 1860, Police Station Rajouri Garden. Subsequently, Section 467 IPC has been added.2. During the pendency of the present application, petitioner No.1 has expired.... Petitioners Nos.2 to 4 were granted interim protection by order dated 11.05.2017 subject to joining investigation.3. The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant and the accused are related to each other. It is alleged that the...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »