Satish Bhaskar vs.state

Satish Bhaskar vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Nov 13, 2018

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1219204

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1219204
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Nov 13, 2018
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Satish Bhaskar

Respondent

State

Excerpt

.....against the family of the complainant for having beaten children of the locality. learned counsel further submits that the incident of beating children was also captured in the cctv camera and has been made available to the io.4. by orders dated 26.09.2017 in bail appln.1952/2017 and dated 11.02.2017 in bail appln.2431/2017, petitioners were granted interim protection subject to joining investigation.5. learned app under instructions submits that... petitioners did join investigation and the investigation is complete and chargesheet is in the process of being finalised for filing. status report has been filed. same is taken on record.6. without commenting on the merits of the case and keeping in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and on perusal of the record, i am of the view that petitioners have made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail. bail appln. 1952/2017 & 2431/2017 page 2 of 3 7. accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest, the arresting officer/io/sho shall release the petitioners on bail, on petitioners furnishing a bail bond in the sum of rs. 15,000/- each with one surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer/sho concerned.... petitioners shall not do anything that may prejudice either the investigation or the prosecution witnesses. petitions are disposed of in the above terms. order dasti under signatures of the court master 8.9. sanjeev sachdeva, j november13 2018 rk bail appln. 1952/2017 & 2431/2017 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~5 & 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1952/2017 Judgment delivered on:

13. 11.2018 + ........ Petitioner

..... Respondent ........ Petitioner

..... Respondent AMRAVATI BHASKAR STATE versus BAIL APPLN. 2431/2017 SATISH BHASKAR STATE versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: For the Respondent : Mr.Santosh Singh Bagga, Adv. Ms.Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Mohd.Imteyaz Alam, P.S.Shahbad Dairy. CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1311.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner

s seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.493/2017, under BAIL APPLN. 1952/2017 & 2431/2017 Page 1 of 3 Section 323/354/365/506/509 IPC, Police Station Shahbad Dairy.

2. Allegations in the FIR are that the complainant was sitting in her house on the stairs when the accused petitioners are alleged to have come and assaulted her and misbehaved with her.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated as the subject FIR is a counter blast to the complaint made by the husband of petitioner Amravati Bhaskar and the father of petitioner Satish Bhaskar against the family of the complainant for having beaten children of the locality. Learned counsel further submits that the incident of beating children was also captured in the CCTV camera and has been made available to the IO.

4. By orders dated 26.09.2017 in Bail Appln.1952/2017 and dated 11.02.2017 in Bail Appln.2431/2017, petitioners were granted interim protection subject to joining investigation.

5. Learned APP under instructions submits that... Petitioner

s did join investigation and the investigation is complete and chargesheet is in the process of being finalised for filing. Status report has been filed. Same is taken on record.

6. Without commenting on the merits of the case and keeping in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and on perusal of the record, I am of the view that petitioners have made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail. BAIL APPLN. 1952/2017 & 2431/2017 Page 2 of 3 7. Accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest, the arresting officer/IO/SHO shall release the petitioners on bail, on petitioners furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- each with one surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/Investigating Officer/SHO concerned.... Petitioner

s shall not do anything that may prejudice either the investigation or the prosecution witnesses. Petitions are disposed of in the above terms. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master 8.

9. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J NOVEMBER13 2018 rk BAIL APPLN. 1952/2017 & 2431/2017 Page 3 of 3

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Satish Bhaskar vs State Same Subject Land Acquisition