Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lt Col h.s. Bedi (Retd) & Anr. Vs.stci Finance Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2018
$-12 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. h November, 2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 427/2018 & IAs 13902/2018 & 15509/2018 LT COL H.S. BEDI (RETD) & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ashim Vaccher, Adv. versus STCI FINANCE LIMITED Through: Mr.Rajshekhar ..... Respondent Rao, Aggarwal, & Mr.Abhishek Mr.Abhinav Mukhi Mr.Sameer Dawar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioners challenging the Arbitral Award dated 14.09.2018 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Loan Agreement dated 28.09.2013 executed between the parties.2. The limited ground of challenge to the Arbitral Award is on the constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal. It is contended by the learned senior counsel for the petitioners ...
M/S Satya Parkash & Bros (P) Ltd. Vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2018
$~31 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:14. h November, 2018 M/S SATYA PARKASH & BROS (P) LTD. ........ Petitioner O.M.P. 27/2012 Through: Mr. Aseem Mehrotra, Advocate. (M:9811062351) versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan and Ms. Nishima Arora, Advocates. (M:9953221778 & 9811036782) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. Present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed challenging the award dated 2nd August, 2011 passed by the Sole Arbitrator. Brief background is that the... Petitioner- M/s. Satya Parkash & Bros (P) 2. (hereinafter Contractor) was awarded a contract Ltd. for work of improvement of Nelson Mandela Road, New Delhi. The stretch was about 4 kms. The work involved the development and widening of the road from four lanes to eight lanes including construction of drains, footpaths and extension of culverts etc. Initially work was awa...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.avinash Bansal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: November 14, 2018 + W.P.(C) 740/2014 & C.M.1488/2014 1. NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajjay Arorra and Mr. Kapil Dutta, Advocates versus AVINASH BANSAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vivek Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Umesh Mishra and Mr. Ashim, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Impugned order of 22nd May, 2012 directs that respondent will be ORDER entitled to use the subject land for social functions subject to condition that an undertaking would be furnished to the effect that respondent shall comply with all the Guidelines except formal permission from the Committee as mentioned in the Guidelines No.1 to 5 and that the re-development work shall be completed within the time decided by the authorities. Impugned order also permits respondent to avail of the benefits of the provisions of the National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Second Act, 2011.2. The cha...
Jagmohan Singh Rawat vs.dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of Indi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:14. 11.2018 + W.P.(C) 6597/2017 VIJAYA KUMAR ANUGANDULA versus Petitioner... RESPONDENTDEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. + W.P.(C) 9279/2017 & CM No.37900/2017 WITH RAJ KUMAR Petitioner versus DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.(DFCCIL)... RESPONDENT+ W.P.(C) 11517/2017 & CM No.46952/2017 WITH VIKAS SINGHAL Petitioner versus DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. (DFCCIL)... RESPONDENT+ W.P.(C) 2167/2018 & CM No.8962/2018 WITH JOGENDER Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 6597/2017 and other connected matters Page 1 of 26... RESPONDENTDEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. + W.P.(C) 2779/2018 & CM No.11231/2018 WITH KULDEEP KUMAR Petitioner versus DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. (DFCCIL)... RESPONDENT+ W.P.(C) 4278/2018 & CM No.16693/2018 WITH SANJAY KUMAR KHODABHAI PATEL Petitioner versus DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. (DFCCIL)...
Dinesh & Anr. Vs.state n.c.t. Of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2018
$~R-30 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 741/2000 Decided on:14. h November, 2018 DINESH & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. M.C. Dhingra, Advocate with appellant Dinesh in person. versus STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Babli, daughter of Som Prakash (PW-15) and Ramkali (PW-8) was married to the appellant Dinesh on 20.04.1988 and thereafter lived with him, as his wife, in his house at 5/373, Khichri Pur, Delhi. She was carrying a foetus of twenty-eight weeks on 29.07.1990 when her father-in-law Kedari Lal (father of the appellant Dinesh) took her in unconscious state to a private medical facility (Walia Nursing Home) in the close vicinity of the locality. The private nursing home did not attend on her and she was eventually brought to Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Narayan Hospital where she was examined, vide medico-legal certificate (MLC) (Ex.PW-17/B), by Dr. Sanjiv Kumar ...
Dharambir vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
$~R-10 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t September, 2018 Pronounced on :13. h November, 2018 % + 1. CRL.A. 658/2017 DHARAMBIR STATE ..... Appellant Through : Mr. S.B. Dandapani, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through : Mr. G.M. Farooqui, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT The appellant Dharambir stands convicted, vide judgment dated 21st March, 2017, passed by the learned Special Judge (NDPS), Dwarka, of having committed the offence punishable under Section 18(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the NDPS Act), as he was found to have been in possession of 30 kilos of opium. Vide separate order, dated 21st March, 2017, the appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of 15 years with fine of 1.5 lakhs, with default sentence of two years simple imprisonment.2. The appellant is in Appeal, before this Court, against the said judgment and order. Crl.A.658/2017 Page 1 ...
Ex Ct Ram Narayan Yadav vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
$~24 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 9516/2016 EX CT RAM NARAYAN YADAV ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. U. Srivastava, Advocate with Ms. Neelima Rathore, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Hasmat Nabi, Advocate with Mr. for Rizwan Ahmed, Advocate Railways. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % ORDER1311.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is a writ petition challenging the order dated 17th June 2016 enclosed with cover letter dated 22nd June 2016 issued by the Director General, RPF, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi, rejecting the... Petitioners appeal made by a letter dated 21st August 2015 against an order of the Staff Officer, RPF dated 3rd June 2015 cancelling his candidature to the post of Constable.2. It must be mentioned at the outset that this is the second round of litigation. The petitioner had previously approached this Court by preferring W.P.(C) 624/2016 questioning the order dated 3rd June 2015 passed by the S...
Manjeet Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:13. 11.2018 + BAIL APPLN. 2577/2018 MANJEET SINGH STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Dr. Adish C. Aggarwala, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhinav Singh, Mr. Amish Aggarwala, Mr. Kuldeep Jauhari and Ms. Preeti Sirohi, Advs. For the Respondent : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Kusum Dhalla, Addl. PP for the State with Inspr. Harjinder Kaur Mr. Ajay K. Tyagi, Adv. for complainant JUDGMENT1311.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.152/2018 under Sections 498-A/406/3IPC registered at Police Station Model Town, Delhi. Subsequently, during investigation, Sections 313/506/509/120-B of the IPC have been added.2. Subject FIR has been registered consequent to a matrimonial discord.... Petitioner is husband of the complainant.3. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been fa...
R S Misra vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision : November 13, 2018 + WP(C) 3634/2018 with CM Appl.14392/2018 R S MISRA Through versus... Petitioner in person. ..... Appellant UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondent Through Ms.Sweena Nair, Advocate for Mr.S.Rajappa, Advocate for KVS. + WP(C) 5456/2018 R S MISRA UNION OF INDIA & ANR.... Petitioner in person. ..... Appellant Through versus ..... Respondent Through Ms.Sweena Nair, Advocate for Mr.S.Rajappa, Advocate for KVS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K. CHAWLA, J.By WP(C) No.3634/2018, the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 16.07.2012 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), WP(C) No.3634/2018 & 5456/2018 Page 1 of 6 Principal Bench, New Delhi whereby the OA No.2301/2012 filed by him was dismissed. The OA preferred by the petitioner came to be dismissed at the 2. admission stage itself for the reliefs prayed in the OA, as under: i) To direct dt.07....
M/S Home Care Service vs.m/s Whirlpool of India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. 11.2018 ARB.P. 592/2018 M/S HOME CARE SERVICE Through Mr. Vikas Singh Jangra, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Kunal Singh, Adv. M/S WHIRLPOOL OF INDIA LTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.: (ORAL) 1 Mr. Singh has returned with instructions. Learned counsel says that there is no dispute as to the existence of the arbitration agreement. Furthermore, learned counsel for the respondent says that he has instructions to convey to the court that his client has no objection to a sole Arbitrator being appointed in the matter. 2 Accordingly, Honble Mr. Justice H.R. Malhotra, former Judge of this Court (Mobile No.9311510400) is appointed as a sole Arbitrator. Learned Arbitrator will be paid fee as per terms of the Fourth Schedule appended to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. 3 The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. 4 The Registry will dispatch a copy...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »