Manjeet Singh vs.state

Manjeet Singh vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Nov 13, 2018

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1219205

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1219205
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Nov 13, 2018
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manjeet Singh

Respondent

State

Excerpt

.....to a matrimonial discord.... petitioner is husband of the complainant.3. learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and complainant is a serving officer in delhi bail appln. 2577/2018 page 1 of 2 police and the fir contains several inaccuracies and exaggerations.4. learned addl. pp, under instructions from the io, submits that the investigation is complete and the chargesheet is in the process of being finalized and is likely to be filed shortly.5. the petitioner has been in custody since 17.09.2018.6. without commenting on the merits of the case and considering the nature of disputes between the parties, i am satisfied that petitioner has made out a case for grant of regular bail.7. accordingly, on petitioner furnishing a bail bond in the sum of rs. 25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned trial court petitioner shall be released on bail, if not required in any other case. the petitioner shall not do anything which may prejudice either the investigation, trial or the prosecution witnesses. the petitioner shall not make any endeavour to contact the prosecutrix or her family. the petition is disposed of in the above terms. order dasti under signatures of the court master.8. 9. sanjeev sachdeva, j november13 2018 ‘rs’ bail appln. 2577/2018 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:

13. 11.2018 + BAIL APPLN. 2577/2018 MANJEET SINGH STATE versus ........ Petitioner

..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: Dr. Adish C. Aggarwala, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhinav Singh, Mr. Amish Aggarwala, Mr. Kuldeep Jauhari and Ms. Preeti Sirohi, Advs. For the Respondent : CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Kusum Dhalla, Addl. PP for the State with Inspr. Harjinder Kaur Mr. Ajay K. Tyagi, Adv. for complainant JUDGMENT1311.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.152/2018 under Sections 498-A/406/3
IPC registered at Police Station Model Town, Delhi. Subsequently, during investigation, Sections 313/506/509/120-B of the IPC have been added.

2. Subject FIR has been registered consequent to a matrimonial discord.... Petitioner

is husband of the complainant.

3. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and complainant is a serving officer in Delhi BAIL APPLN. 2577/2018 Page 1 of 2 Police and the FIR contains several inaccuracies and exaggerations.

4. Learned Addl. PP, under instructions from the IO, submits that the investigation is complete and the chargesheet is in the process of being finalized and is likely to be filed shortly.

5. The petitioner has been in custody since 17.09.2018.

6. Without commenting on the merits of the case and considering the nature of disputes between the parties, I am satisfied that petitioner has made out a case for grant of regular bail.

7. Accordingly, on petitioner furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned trial court petitioner shall be released on bail, if not required in any other case. The petitioner shall not do anything which may prejudice either the investigation, trial or the prosecution witnesses. The petitioner shall not make any endeavour to contact the prosecutrix or her family. The petition is disposed of in the above terms. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

8. 9. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J NOVEMBER13 2018 ‘rs’ BAIL APPLN. 2577/2018 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Manjeet Singh vs State Same Subject Criminal