Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Larsen and Toubro Ltd vs.delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2018
$~27-28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h November, 2018 + + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 443/2018 O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 444/2018 LARSEN AND TOUBRO LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ravi Varma, Mr.S.Kirmani, Mr.Lakshay Khanna, Mr.Ashutosh Ranjan, Advs. versus DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Manish Srivastava, Mr.Deboshree Mukherjee, Mr.Aditya Gupta, Mr.Ashish Verma, Advs. for R-1. Ms.Kashish Narang, Ms.Jasleen Budhiraja, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) I.A. No.16307/ 2018 in O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 443/2018 I.A. No.16308/ 2018 in O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 444/2018 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P.(I)(COMM) Nos.443 & 444/2018 Page 1 O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 443/2018 O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 444/2018 1. These petitions have been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenging the invocation of the Ban...
Darshan Kumar vs.yogshri Chemicals Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2018
$~13 to 15 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"30th November, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 4213/2016 and Crl.M.A.17541-17542/2016 + SONIA MITTAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Advocate with Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, Mr. Sidhant Kr. Singh & Mr. Raghav Wadhwa, Advocates versus YOGSHRI CHEMICALS PVT LTD ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manoj Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Kapil Kaushik, Mr. Alok Singh & Mr. Deepak Shukla, Advocates CRL.M.C. 4214/2016 and Crl.M.A.17544-17545/2016 ANIL KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Advocate with Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, Mr. Sidhant Kr. Singh & Mr. Raghav Wadhwa, Advocates versus YOGESHRI CHEMICALS PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Kapil Kaushik, Mr. Alok Singh & Mr. Deepak Shukla, Advocates + CRL.M.C. 4216/2016 and Crl.M.A.17562-17563/2016 DARSHAN KUMAR Crl. M.C. No.4213/2016 etc. ........ Petitioner Page 1 of 8 Through: Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Advocate with Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, M...
Afzal vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.A.No.996/2016 Judgment reserved on :26. 10.2018 Date of decision :30. 11.2018 AFZAL Through: Ms. Naomi Chandra, Advocate versus ..... Appellant STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, Addl. PP for the State. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The appellant, Afzal S/o Abdul Rehman, vide the present appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, assails the impugned judgment dated 26.8.2016 and also the impugned order on sentence of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-01 (North-East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in SC No.44297/2015 in relation to FIR No.161/2013, Police Station Gokalpuri, registered under Sections 363/377/323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 6 of the POCSO Act whereby the appellant herein was convicted for the offences punishable under Sectionsof the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and was sentence...
Naveen Kuar Hotla vs.state Gnct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2018
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 11.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1802/2017 NAVEEN KUAR HOTLA versus STATE GNCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Vikrant Choudhary and Mr. Rahul Dadwal, Adv. For the Respondent: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Jitender Joshi, PS Sabji Mandi CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT3011.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.635/2015 under Sections 468/471/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Police Station Sabji Mandi, Delhi.2. The allegations are that the petitioner was a witness to a receipt- cum-agreement based on which another FIR being FIR No.73/2012 was registered in which the complainant of the present FIR was the accused. During investigation of the said FIR, it transpired that the document i.e. receipt-cum-agreement which was alleged to have been BAIL APPLN. 1802/2017 Page 1 ...
Prafull Kumar Jena vs.kamal Kishore Gulati
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2018
$~30 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI C.R.P. 256/2018 PRAFULL KUMAR JENA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. D.K. Sharma and Ms. Shilpa, Advs. versus KAMAL KISHORE GULATI Through: Mr. R.K. Jain, Advocate for R2. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % ORDER3011.2018 CM No.49950-49951/2018 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The applications are disposed of. C.R.P. 256/2018 & CM No.49949/2018 (stay) 3. The impugned order dated 04.08.2018 passed by the Court of learned Civil Judge-02, Central District, Delhi in Civil Suit No.2427/2017 (old CS No.312/2017) dismissing two applications of the petitioner; one under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC); and another under Order XXXIX Rule 10 read with 151 CPC are the subject matter of challenge in this petition.4. Admittedly, the shop in question was taken by the petitioner from the respondent/plaintiff under the lease agreement dated 02.11.2015 at the C.R.P. 256/2018 1 of 3 monthly rent...
Sonia Mittal vs.yogshri Chemicals Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2018
$~13 to 15 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"30th November, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 4213/2016 and Crl.M.A.17541-17542/2016 + SONIA MITTAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Advocate with Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, Mr. Sidhant Kr. Singh & Mr. Raghav Wadhwa, Advocates versus YOGSHRI CHEMICALS PVT LTD ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manoj Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Kapil Kaushik, Mr. Alok Singh & Mr. Deepak Shukla, Advocates CRL.M.C. 4214/2016 and Crl.M.A.17544-17545/2016 ANIL KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Advocate with Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, Mr. Sidhant Kr. Singh & Mr. Raghav Wadhwa, Advocates versus YOGESHRI CHEMICALS PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Kapil Kaushik, Mr. Alok Singh & Mr. Deepak Shukla, Advocates + CRL.M.C. 4216/2016 and Crl.M.A.17562-17563/2016 DARSHAN KUMAR Crl. M.C. No.4213/2016 etc. ........ Petitioner Page 1 of 8 Through: Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Advocate with Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, M...
Ankit Chauhan vs.gnctd (State )
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2018
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 11.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1643/2018 ANKIT CHAUHAN versus GNCTD ( STATE ) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.Sushil Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent : Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. SI Pankaj Kumar, P.S. Chattarpur. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT3011.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.126/2018 under Sections 323/341/427/5IPC. It is informed that Section 392 has been added later on.2. It is noticed that Sections 323/341/427/506 IPC are bailable apart from Section 392 IPC, which has been added later on.3. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the other co-accused stopped the car of the complainant in which he and his brother were travelling and thereafter dragged them out of BAIL APPLN. 1643/2018 Page 1 of 3 the car, assaulted them and dam...
Shah E Naaz Judge vs.additional Director of Income Tax (Inv)-Unit Vi a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.5937/2016 Reserved on :10. h May, 2018 Date of decision:30. h November, 2018 SHAH E NAAZ JUDGE ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Satyen Sethi, Mr. Arta Trana Panda & Ms. Gargee Sethi, Advocates. versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INV)-UNIT VI AND ANOTHER ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Sr. Standing Counsel. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.11842/2016 SAHYR KOHLI ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Satyen Sethi, Mr. Arta Trana Panda & Ms. Gargee Sethi, Advocates. versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INV)-UNIT VI AND ANOTHER ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Sr. Standing Counsel. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.11843/2016 SANDEEP KOHLI ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Satyen Sethi, Mr. Arta Trana Panda & Ms. Gargee Sethi, Advocates. versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INV)-UNIT VI AND ANOTHER ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE ...
Prithvi Nath Pandey vs.moti Lal Nehru College & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 1164/2014 Date of decision:30. h November, 2018 PRITHVI NATH PANDEY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. A.P. Mohanty, Adv. with petitioner in person. versus MOTI LAL NEHRU COLLEGE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. A.P.S. Ahluwalia, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Adv. for R-1 & R-2. Mr. Santosh Kumar and Mr. Ram Gupta, Advs. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) Rev. Pet. 57/2018 1. This Review Petition has been filed seeking review of order dated September 20, 2017 passed in the aforesaid writ petition whereby this Court had dismissed the writ petition being without any merit. The petitioner challenged the said order before the Supreme Court in SLP(Civil) 1196/2018 wherein, the Supreme Court on January 22, 2018 had passed the following order:-"Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the special leave petition. He says that he will Rev. Pet. No.57/2018 in W.P.(C) 1164/20...
Jagdis Saran vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2018
$~25 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2447/2018 JAGDIS SARAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anil Dabas, Advocate with Inspector Sanjay Kumar, CISF. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % ORDER3011.2018 1. The... Petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, impugning orders dated 22nd July, 2017 and 26th December, 2017 whereby the... RESPONDENTS have rejected the representations of the... Petitioner and declined to consider his resignation as a technical resignation'. Consequently... Petitioners past service of one year and three months in CISF at the rank of Sub-Inspector is not being considered for claiming benefits under CCS Rules (Pension) 1972. Brief facts:2. The... Petitioner prepared for competitive examinations and applied for recruitment in various services. In 2002,... Petitioner appeared in the Central Police O...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »