Ankit Chauhan vs.gnctd (State )

Ankit Chauhan vs Gnctd (State )

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Nov 30, 2018

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1219656

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1219656
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Nov 30, 2018
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ankit Chauhan

Respondent

Gnctd (State )

Excerpt

.....that there is a video recording made by the complainant on his cell phone which had captured the incident as also the presence of the petitioner and his involvement in the subject offence.5. the video was sent to forensic science laboratory for the purposes of examination. the forensic science laboratory has submitted a report wherein it is opined that facial recognition test could not be possible on account of low pixel resolution.6.... petitioner was granted interim protection by order dated 18.07.2018 subject to joining investigation.7. learned app under instructions submits that the investigation is complete and charge sheet is in the process of being finalised for being filed.8. keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting on the merits of the case and on perusal of the record, i am of the view that petitioner has made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail.9. accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest, the arresting officer/io/sho shall release the petitioner on bail on his furnishing a bail bond in the sum of rs. 15,000/- with one surety of bail appln. 1643/2018 page 2 of 3 the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer/sho concerned.... petitioner shall not do anything that may prejudice the trial or the prosecution witnesses.10. the petition is disposed of in the above terms.11. order dasti under signatures of the court master. november30 2018 rk sanjeev sachdeva, j bail appln. 1643/2018 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:

30. 11.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1643/2018 ANKIT CHAUHAN versus GNCTD ( STATE ) ........ Petitioner

..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: Mr.Sushil Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent : Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. SI Pankaj Kumar, P.S. Chattarpur. CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT3011.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner

seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.126/2018 under Sections 323/341/427/5
IPC. It is informed that Section 392 has been added later on.

2. It is noticed that Sections 323/341/427/506 IPC are bailable apart from Section 392 IPC, which has been added later on.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the other co-accused stopped the car of the complainant in which he and his brother were travelling and thereafter dragged them out of BAIL APPLN. 1643/2018 Page 1 of 3 the car, assaulted them and damaged their car. It is alleged that money was removed from the pocket of the brother of the complainant.

4. It was contended that there is a video recording made by the complainant on his cell phone which had captured the incident as also the presence of the petitioner and his involvement in the subject offence.

5. The video was sent to Forensic Science Laboratory for the purposes of examination. The Forensic Science Laboratory has submitted a report wherein it is opined that facial recognition test could not be possible on account of low pixel resolution.

6.... Petitioner

was granted interim protection by order dated 18.07.2018 subject to joining investigation.

7. Learned APP under instructions submits that the investigation is complete and Charge Sheet is in the process of being finalised for being filed.

8. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting on the merits of the case and on perusal of the record, I am of the view that petitioner has made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail.

9. Accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest, the arresting officer/IO/SHO shall release the petitioner on bail on his furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- with one surety of BAIL APPLN. 1643/2018 Page 2 of 3 the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/Investigating Officer/SHO concerned.... Petitioner

shall not do anything that may prejudice the Trial or the prosecution witnesses.

10. The petition is disposed of in the above terms.

11. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. NOVEMBER30 2018 rk SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J BAIL APPLN. 1643/2018 Page 3 of 3

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Ankit Chauhan vs Gnctd (State ) Same Subject Land Acquisition