Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sandeep Katyal vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
32# $~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:4. h October, 2018 W.P.(CRL) 2505/2018 SANDEEP KATYAL ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Manish Gandhi, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Additional ..... Respondent Standing Counsel for State and Mr. Piyush Singhal, Advocate with W/SI Rishali Yadav, PS Tilak Nagar. Mr. Hemant Verma and Ms. Pooja Chauhan, Advocates for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. Nos. 32636/2018 (Delay) For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 10 days in filing the reply affidavit is condoned. Application is disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 2505/2018 and Crl. M.A. No.30604/2018 (stay) 1. By this petition, petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.265/2018 under Sections 376/3IPC registered at PS Tilak Nagar, Delhi on the complaint of respondent No.2.2. Grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that on the similar W.P.(Crl.) No.250...
Vaidehi Thakar vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~14 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"4th October, 2018 CRL. M.C. 1381/2016 & Crl.M.A. 5983/2016 VAIDEHI THAKAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. N.B. Joshi, Advocate with Mr. Abhijeet Negi, Advocate Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP and Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) On the criminal complaint (CC No.55/1/15) of the second respondent (the complainant), the petitioner was summoned by the Metropolitan Magistrate, by order dated 09.09.2015, on the accusation of offence punishable under Section 18 of the Working Journalists and Other Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 (for short, the Act of 1955).2. Feeling aggrieved, the present petition was filed invoking the inherent power and jurisdiction of this court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) primarily on the submission that the ...
Kamal Sharma & Ors vs.m/s Blue Coast Infrastructure Development Pvt Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~ * + #9, 12, 13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 176/2015 KAMAL SHARMA & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr. T.K. Ganju, Senior Advocate with Mr. Aquib Ali, Advocates versus M/S BLUE COAST INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PVT LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr. Rushil Deshpande, Advocate for D-1. Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Naman Joshi, Mr. Pranvir Sethi, Ms. Avshreya P.S. Rudy and Mr. Abhishek Chhabra, Advocates for D-2. Mr. Ankur Chawla with Mr. Sangram Singh, Ms. Megha Gupta and Mr. Mohit Gupta, Advocates for D-3 Mr. Vijay Aggarwal with Mr. Vishal Bhardwaj and Mr. Abhishek Chabra, Advocates for D-5 to D-8. Mr. Manu Nair with Mr. Tanuj Bhushan and Mr. Manik Sachdeva, Advocates for D- 9/DIAL. CS(OS) 176/2015, 87/2018 & 88/2018 Page 1 of 15 + Dr. Sarbjit Sharma with Ms. Leeza Taneja, Advocates for D-147 to 149. Mr. Amanjeet Singh, Advocate for IFCI. Mr. Dheeraj Gupta, Advocate for Applicants/Mr. Pradeep Jaiswal, Mr. Amit Garg and Mr. Rahul Garg. Mr. Manoj Arora ...
Mukesh & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4782/2018 Judgment delivered on:03.10.2018 MUKESH & ORS. THE STATE & ANR. versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Basant Kr. Gautam and Mr. Siddhartha Narwal, Advocates. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State with SI Omveer Singh, PS Nand Nagri. Mr. Vipin Kumar, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0310.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.32443/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4782/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.701 of 2015 under Sections 498A/4IPC registered at Police Station Nand Nagari, based on a settlement. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.2. CRL.M.C. 4782/2018 Page 1 of 3... Petitioner No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2.... Petitioner Nos.2 and 4 are the other family members of the petitioner N...
Devinder Khosla vs.anil Khosla & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$-33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d October, 2018 + O.M.P.23/2018 DEVINDER KHOSLA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Sourabh Malhotra and Mr.Yatin Chadha, Advs. versus ANIL KHOSLA & ANR. Through Nemo ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) I.A. No.13592-93/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P. 23/2018 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 29.06.2018 passed by the Sole Arbitrator confined to the issue that the Arbitrator has erred in holding that the claim of the petitioner towards properties not being covered in the Interim Award dated 08.03.2006 is beyond the scope of the reference.2. To answer the above issue, the history of the litigation between the parties will have to be considered. OMP No.23/2018 Page 1 3. The parties to the petition ...
Giorgio Armani S P a & Ors vs.yogesh Mordani & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~21 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:3. d October, 2018 CS (COMM) 213/2018 GIORGIO ARMANI S P A & ORS Through: None. versus ..... Plaintiffs ..... Defendants YOGESH MORDANI & ORS Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH (Oral) Prathiba M. Singh, J.1. Plaintiff No.1- Giorgio Armani S. P. A. is an Italian company and Plaintiff No.2 is its Swiss subsidiary. The Plaintiff Nos.1 & 2 are known for high end fashion products. They together own the ARMANI marks, which are Giorgio Armani, Armani Collezioni, Emporio Armani, AJ | Armani Jeans, AX / Armani Exchange, Armani Junior, and Armani/Casa (hereinafter `ARMANI marks).2. In India, the Plaintiff Nos.1 & 2 market and sell their products under the ARMANI marks through Plaintiff No.3 Genesis La Mode Pvt. Ltd. The name ARMANI is coined from the founder of the Plaintiff 3. Company, namely Giorgio Armani. The ARMANI menswear label was launched in the early 70s. The reputation of the brand/founder grew by leaps an...
M/S Design Decisions Inc Through Shri Anil Kumar Jain, Sole Proprietor ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :3. d October, 2018 + W.P.(C) 10513/2018 & CM Nos.41058-41059/2018 M/S DESIGN DECISIONS INC THROUGH SHRI ANIL KUMAR JAIN, SOLE PROPRIETOR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Inder Jit Singh, Adv. versus YOGESH ARORA ..... Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) This writ petition challenges an Award, dated 9th October, 2017, % 1. passed by the Labour Court, on a reference, dated 26th August, 2015, received from the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi, with respect to an industrial dispute between the petitioner and the respondent.2. The respondent, in his statement of claim, stated that he had been appointed with the management of the petitioner, as an assistant architect, in December, 1988. He further stated that the petitioner had a sister concern named M/s Designers Consortium, being run by the same proprietor (though Mr. Singh submits tha...
Suninder Sandha vs.m/s Concept Horizon Infra Private Limited & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3941/2018 Judgment delivered on:03.10.2018 SUNINDER SANDHA ........ Petitioner versus M/S CONCEPT HORIZON INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Jatin Sehgal, Mr. Adhirath Singh & Mr. Viren Bansal, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Saket Sikri & Mr. Ajay Pal Singh, Advocates. JUDGMENT0310.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks a direction to the trial court to expedite the disposal of the complaint case filed by the petitioner.2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that insofar as the prayer for expeditious disposal is concerned, he has no objection to the same, however, he denies the factual averments made in the petition and submits that parties are already in arbitration and further, as per the respondent no case is made out and he reserves his right to CRL.M.C. 3941/2018 Page ...
Sonu & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5048/2018 Judgment delivered on:03.10.2018 SONU & ORS. versus STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Chaudhary & Mr. H.K. Dhariwal, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Addl. PP for the State SI Ashwani, PS Jyoti Nagar. Mr. R.P. Tyagi, Advocate for R-2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0310.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. No.33430/2018 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Crl. M.C. No.5048/2018 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.402/2010 under Sections 498A/4IPC and Section 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police CRL.M.C. 5048/2018 Page 1 of 3 Station Jyoti Nagar, based on a settlement.2. Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.... Petitioner No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2.... Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the re...
Gopal Goel vs.sapna
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:3. d October, 2018 CRL.L.P. 410/2016 GOPAL GOEL SAPNA Represented by: Mr. Pranav Sapra, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus Represented by: Father of respondent in person. ..... Respondent Mr. Ashok K. Kumar, APP for the State with ACP Akanksha Yadav, Inspector Arun Dev Nehra, SHO Paschim Vihar and SI Imran Khan. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. No.12087/2016 (Delay) For the reasons stated in the application delay of 36 days in filing the leave to appeal petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. CRL.L.P. 410/2016 1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 23rd March 2016, whereby the learned Metropolitan Magistrate acquitted the respondent for the offence punishable under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 in CC No.316/1/2016 titled as "Gopal Goel v. Sapna", the petitioner/complainant has preferred the present leave petition.2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case as per the compla...
- ‹ Prev
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- Next ›
- Last »