Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Images Consumer Media Pvt. Ltd. Vs.horse Shoe Retail Holding pvt.ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~CP-12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:04. 10.2018 + CO.PET. 418/2016 IMAGES CONSUMER MEDIA PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Kanti Mohan Rustagi, Mr.Shubho Jana and Mr.Arpit Arora, Advs. versus HORSE SHOE RETAIL HOLDING PVT.LTD ..... Respondent Through Mohd. Kamran and Mr.Saurabh Chaturvedi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) This petition is filed under Sections 433(e), (f), 434(1)(a) and 439 of 1. the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking winding up of the respondent Company.2. It is the case of the petitioner that the parties entered into an arrangement whereby the petitioner had to publish advertisements of the products of the respondents company in its publication named Livingetc commencing from February, 2010 till April, 2011. It is stated that the petitioner published full page colour ads of the products of the respondent company in the monthly issues of Livingetc and corresponding t...
Hindustan Media Ventures Ltd. & Ors. Vs.state Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~11 & 12 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Decided on:-"4th October, 2018 CRL.M.C. 3941/2015 & CRL.M.A. Nos. 13976-13977/2015, 2473/2018 SHOBHANA BHARTIA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Kapur, Mr.Vivek Suri, Mr. Mayank Datta and Mr.Aashneet Singh, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State + CRL.M.C. 3947/2015 & CRL.M.A. Nos. 17806-17807/2015, 2472/2018 HINDUSTAN MEDIA VENTURES LTD. & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Kapur, Mr.Vivek Suri, Mr. Mayank Datta and Mr.Aashneet Singh, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Crl. M.C. No.39412015 Etc. ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 12 Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) On the criminal complaint (DLC/NDD/IO/2015/2398) dated 14.08.2015 of the second respondent (the complainant), the pe...
Vijay Krishan vs.the State Trading Corporation & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:5. h September, 2018 Pronounced on:4. h October, 2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. V.P. Singh, Adv. VIJAY KRISHAN + W.P.(C) 6301/2010 versus THE STATE TRADING CORPORATION & ORS Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath, Adv. ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT1 The petitioner, who had put in 36 years of service in the Government and public sector, was appointed, in the State Trading Corporation of India Ltd (Respondent No.1 herein and referred to, hereinafter, as STC), as Director (Finance), vide Department of Commerce Office Memorandum, dated 23rd July, 2002, for a period of 5 years from the date of taking charge of the post or till superannuation, or further orders, which was earlier. The petitioner assumed charge of the post of Director (Finance) on 1st August, 2002, and retired, on 31st July, 2006, on attaining the age of superannuation, vide Office Order dated 12th May, 2006. W.P.(C) 6301/2010 Page 1...
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.shanti Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 04, 2018 + MAC.APP. 582/2013 + MAC.APP. 584/2013 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate ..... Appellant versus ARJUN DASS & ORS SHANTI DEVI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. In the above captioned appeals, recovery rights are sought against driver and owner of insured vehicle. Since these appeals arise out of common impugned Award, therefore, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, both the appeals have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.2. The challenge in these appeals to impugned Award of 6th April, 2013 rendered by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) survives qua respondents No.9 & 10 i.e. driver and owner of insured vehicle against whom appellants seek recovery rights. The facts as noticed in the impugned Award are as under:-"...
Deepanshi & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~81 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C.5075/2018 Judgment delivered on:04. 10.2018 DEEPANSHI & ORS. STATE & ANR. versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Sanjeev Kr. Sarwal, Advocate Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Hiren Sharma, APP for the State. with SI Saeem Ali JUDGMENT0410.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 33527/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5075/2018 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.109 of 2017 under Sections 380/4of the IPC registered at Police Station Harsh Vihar, Delhi, based on a settlement.2. Subject complaint was lodged on the ground that the complainant found that his almirah had been broken into and certain money and jewellery articles were missing. CRL.M.C. 5075/2018 Page 1 of 2 3.... Petitioner No.1-accused is the daughter of the complainant and other petitioners are friends of petitioner ...
Smt. Krishna Gupta vs.vipin Kumar & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI R.C. REV. 472/2018 Judgment reserved on :1. t October,2018 Date of decision:4. h October, 2018. SMT. KRISHNA GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, Adv. versus VIPIN KUMAR & ANR. Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner assails the impugned order dated 09.03.2018 of the Court of the learned CCJ-cum-ARC-1 (Central), (Pilot Court), Tis Hazari Courts, New Delhi in Eviction Petition No.673/2017/CIS7852017 whereby the eviction petition filed by the respondent nos. 1 & 2 to the present R.C. Rev. 472/2018 seeking eviction of the petitioner herein from the tenanted premises i.e. one hall admeasuring 148 x 90and one room admeasuring 75 x 100and passage admeasuring 36(width) on the ground floor, House No.10433, Gali Pathshalawali, Manakpura, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005, more specifically shown in red colour in the site plan annexed along with the petition...
Government of Nct of Delhi vs.premwati and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h October, 2018. W.P.(C) 7075/2015 & CM No.12966/2015 (for stay) GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Zahid Hanif and Ms. Sana for Mr. Naushad Naseem, Adv. Ahmed Khan, Adv. Versus PREMWATI AND ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Himanshu Gautam, Adv. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the judgment [dated 21st November, 2014 in PPA No.01/14/2007 of the Additional District Judge (West) acting as the Appellate Officer under Section 9 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 (PP Act)]. allowing the appeal preferred by the predecessor of the respondents no.1 to 3 namely, Smt. Premwati, Rakesh Kumar and Mukesh Kumar against the order [bearing No.F.6/SDM/VV/2005/8209-11 dated 27th December, 2006 of the respondent no.4-Estate Officer]. of eviction of the predecessor of respondents No.1 to 3 from ...
Rajeev Sharma vs.shri Raj Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: October 04, 2018 W.P.(C) 2124/2016 & CM91202016 RAJEEV SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. J.K. Jain, Advocate versus SHRI RAJ KUMAR & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha, Ms. Worthing Kasar and Ms. Raunika Johar, Advocates for respondents No.3, 4 and 5 Mr. Sumit Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.7 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Impugned order of 10th November, 2015 sets aside the order of 30th May, 2012 of the concerned Collector and thereby restores the order of 3rd February, 1982 of the Revenue Assistant.2. It is matter of record that the Revenue Assistants order was ex parte and even the order of the concerned Collector was ex parte. The Financial Commissioner in the impugned order has taken note of delay of more than 24 years in filing of the appeal by petitioner herein. Strangely, the concerned Collector does not deal with the delay aspect and maintains that the delay is presume...
Davinder Kumar & Ors vs.the State & Anr. (govt.of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~74 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5065/2018 Judgment delivered on:04.10.2018 DAVINDER KUMAR & ORS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS versus THE STATE & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Basant Kr. Gautam and Mr. Siddhartha Narwal, Advocates. Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghai, APP for State with SI Praveen Kumar, PS Mandawali. JUDGMENT0410.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.33498/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5065/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.1230 of 2014 under Sections 498A/4IPC registered at Police Station Mandawali, Delhi, based on a settlement. CRL.M.C. 5065/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.... Petitioner No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2.... Petitioner Nos.2 to 6 are the other family members of the petitioner No.1.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner...
Shobhana Bhartia & Ors. Vs.state Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~11 & 12 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Decided on:-"4th October, 2018 CRL.M.C. 3941/2015 & CRL.M.A. Nos. 13976-13977/2015, 2473/2018 SHOBHANA BHARTIA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Kapur, Mr.Vivek Suri, Mr. Mayank Datta and Mr.Aashneet Singh, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State + CRL.M.C. 3947/2015 & CRL.M.A. Nos. 17806-17807/2015, 2472/2018 HINDUSTAN MEDIA VENTURES LTD. & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Kapur, Mr.Vivek Suri, Mr. Mayank Datta and Mr.Aashneet Singh, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Crl. M.C. No.39412015 Etc. ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 12 Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) On the criminal complaint (DLC/NDD/IO/2015/2398) dated 14.08.2015 of the second respondent (the complainant), the pe...
- ‹ Prev
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- Next ›
- Last »