Deepanshi & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.

Deepanshi & Ors. vs State & Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 04, 2018

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1218433

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1218433
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Oct 04, 2018
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Deepanshi & Ors.

Respondent

State & Anr.

Excerpt

.....ground that the complainant found that his almirah had been broken into and certain money and jewellery articles were missing. crl.m.c. 5075/2018 page 1 of 2 3.... petitioner no.1-accused is the daughter of the complainant and other petitioners are friends of petitioner no.1.4. learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes and settlement agreement dated 13.04.2018 has been executed between the parties.5. respondent no.2 is present in person and is identified by the investigating officer. he submits that he has settled the disputes with the petitioners and does not wish to press charges against the petitioners and prosecute the complaint any further.6. in view of the fact that the parties are related and have resolved their disputes and respondent no.2 does not wish to press his complaint, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. it would be expedient to quash the subject fir and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.7. in view of the above, the petition is allowed. fir no.109 of 2017 under sections 380/4of the ipc registered at police station harsh vihar, delhi and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are, accordingly, quashed.8. order dasti under the signatures of the court master. october04 2018/‘rs’ sanjeev sachdeva, j crl.m.c. 5075/2018 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~81 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C.5075/2018 Judgment delivered on:

04. 10.2018 DEEPANSHI & ORS. STATE & ANR. versus ........ Petitioner

s ........ RESPONDENTS

Mr. Sanjeev Kr. Sarwal, Advocate Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: For the... RESPONDENTS

: CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Hiren Sharma, APP for the State. with SI Saeem Ali JUDGMENT0410.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 33527/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5075/2018 1.... Petitioner

seeks quashing of FIR No.109 of 2017 under Sections 380/4
of the IPC registered at Police Station Harsh Vihar, Delhi, based on a settlement.

2. Subject complaint was lodged on the ground that the complainant found that his almirah had been broken into and certain money and jewellery articles were missing. CRL.M.C. 5075/2018 Page 1 of 2 3.... Petitioner

No.1-accused is the daughter of the complainant and other petitioners are friends of petitioner No.1.

4. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes and settlement agreement dated 13.04.2018 has been executed between the parties.

5. Respondent No.2 is present in person and is identified by the Investigating Officer. He submits that he has settled the disputes with the petitioners and does not wish to press charges against the petitioners and prosecute the complaint any further.

6. In view of the fact that the parties are related and have resolved their disputes and respondent No.2 does not wish to press his complaint, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

7. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No.109 of 2017 under Sections 380/4
of the IPC registered at Police Station Harsh Vihar, Delhi and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are, accordingly, quashed.

8. Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master. OCTOBER04 2018/‘rs’ SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J CRL.M.C. 5075/2018 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Deepanshi & Ors. vs State & Anr. Same Subject Criminal