Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
N C Gupta vs.punjab National Bank and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10665/2018 & CM APPL. 41570/2018 Date of decision:8. h October, 2018 N C GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Deepak Singh, Adv. versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Jagat Arora with Mr.Murad Khan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The... Petitioner joined the services of the RespondentBank on 21st September, 1972. On 1st August 2008, he was suspended, which was followed up by issuance, to him, of a charge-sheet on 21st January, 2009 and a supplementary charge-sheet on 4th March, 2010.2. The disciplinary proceedings that ensued, culminated in the imposition, on the petitioner of a penalty of removal from service, vide order dated 23rd March, 2011.3. An appeal preferred by the petitioner thereagainst, was dismissed on 30th December, 2011. W.P.(C) 10665/2018 Page 1 of 4 4. The petitioner approached this Court, vide WP(C) 2761/2012, challenging the aforementioned pe...
Hari Om vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08.10.2018 BAIL APPLN. 353/2017 HARI OM STATE (NCT OF DELHI) versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Akhilesh Pradhan, Advocate For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State with SI Prem Raj CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0810.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.617/2016 under Sectionsof the IPC registered at Police Station Vijay Vihar, New Delhi.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner who is son of the mothers brother of the prosecutrix used to misbehave with her. In December, 2015 when her husband was not at home he is alleged to have entered the house, misbehaved with her and thereafter committed BAIL APPLN. 353/2017 Page 1 of 3 the offence of rape on her. Thereafter he is alleged to have again misbehaved with her on 05.07.2016 and 15.07.2016. Howe...
Sarabjit Singh vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
$~7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:08. h October, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 2856/2015 and Crl. M.A. 10176/2015 SARABJIT SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Kanika Agnihotri, Mr. Rudresh Jagpale and Mr. Preet Singh Oberoi, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State Mr. B.S. Arora, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner had lodged a criminal case (CC no.81/08) against the third respondent alleging offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) having been committed, the allegations set out in the said complaint pertaining to three cheques, they bearing no.364267 dated 11.10.2007 for Rs.3,50,000/-; no.364269 dated 13.10.2017 for Rs.3,36,875/-; and no.364268 dated 15.10.2007 for Rs.3,50,000/-, all drawn on State Bank of India, it being his case that the cheques had been issued against the account of company M-Tech Developers Pvt. Lt...
Manoj Kumar & Ors vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
$~74 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5117/2018 Judgment delivered on:08.10.2018 MANOJ KUMAR & ORS THE STATE & ANR versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Dinesh Kumar and Mr. Surinder Kumar, Advocates along with petitioners in person For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Hirien Sharma, APP for State with SI Ved Pal Sharma, PS Mangol Puri Ms. Madhvi Gautam and Mr. Nitesh Khatri, Advs. for R-2 along with R-2 in person CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0810.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.33721/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5117/2018 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.988/2016, under Sections 498A/4IPC, Police Station Mangol Puri, based on a settlement. It is contended that petitioner no.1 is the husband of the 2. CRL.M.C. 5117/2018 Page 1 of 3 respondent No.2. The subject FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discor...
The New India Assurance co.ltd. Vs.yashpal @ Kallu & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 08, 2018 + MAC.APP. 114/2013 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.P.N Shahi, Advocate Versus YASHPAL @ KALLU & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nishant Shaiva, Advocate for respondent No.1 YASHPAL @ KALLU + MAC.APP. 839/2018 Versus ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Yash Pal Sapra, Advocate THE NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Through: Mr. J.P.N Shahi, Advocate ..... Respondent 1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 30th November, 2012 grants compensation of `15,33,872/- with interest @9% per annum to a Milk Vendor-Yashpal (hereinafter referred to as the Injured), aged 24 years, on account of grievous injuries suffered by him in a vehicular accident, which took place on 16th August, 2012. MAC.APP. 114/2013 MAC.APP. 839/2018 Page 1 of 6 2. In the above captioned first appeal, The New India Assurance Company Limited (henceforth referred to as the Insurer) seeks reductio...
Bacchu Singh vs.santosh Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
#120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:08. 10.2018. CONT. CAS (C) 779/2018 BACCHU SINGH versus SANTOSH KUMAR & ORS. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr. Ajay Kr. Thakur and Mr. Kanwal Deep Bhath, Advocates. : Mr. Rizwan and Ms. Priyanka Goel, Advocates for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Ms. Puja Kalra, Advocate for respondent No.3/NDMC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present contempt petition instituted on behalf of the petitioner/contemnor under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, essentially seeks a direction to punish the respondents for non-compliance of the order dated 9th January, 2015, passed by this Court in writ petition being W.P.(C) No.192/2015, titled as Bacchu Singh vs. Commissioner of Industries & Ors.(hereinafter referred to as the said order). Cont. Cas (C ) 779/201818 Page 1 of 6 2. The relevant...
Fatima Nafees vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:4. h September, 2018 Decided on:8. h October, 2018 + W.P. (CRL) 3391/2016 & Crl. M.A. Nos. 8174/2017, 8651/2018 & 9015/2018 FATIMA NAFEES ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Nabila Hasan, Advocate. STATE & ORS. versus ...Respondents Through: Mr. Nikhil Goel & Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Advocates for CBI. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: Introduction 1. When her 27 year old son Najeeb, a student of M. Sc (Bio-Technology) at the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), went missing on 15th October, 2016 and nothing was heard of him for a month thereafter, the... Petitioner filed the present petition on 21st November, 2016, seeking a writ of habeas corpus for his production.2. Unhappy with the efforts of the Delhi Police to investigate her complaint, W.P. (Crl) 3391/2016 Page 1 of 34 which was registered as FIR No.523/2016 under Section 365 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC...
Public Information Officer vs.v. Chaudhary
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:08. 10.2018 W.P.(C) 2025/2014 & CM No 4213/2014 % + PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER ...Petitioner Versus V. CHAUDHARY... RESPONDENTAdvocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner :Mr Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with Ms Nidhi Raman and Mr Chirayu Jain. :Mr Manoj Kumar Sahu. For the Respondent CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner (PIO) has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugning the order dated 20.01.2014 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter CIC).2. By the impugned order, the CIC allowed the second appeal preferred by the respondent under Section 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereafter RTI Act) by directing the petitioner to enable inspection of the relevant files by the respondent and to provide the photocopies of the relevant documents pertaining to the informat...
Kishore Kumar vs.the State & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
$~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5114/2018 Judgment delivered on:08.10.2018 KISHORE KUMAR THE STATE & ORS versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Nitin Bansal, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS : along with R-2 and R-3 in person Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State with Inspector SatyaPal Singh, PS Bharat Nagar Mr. Prashant Chakravarty, Adv. for R-2 with R-3 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0810.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.33717/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5114/2018 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.294 of 2013 under Section 324 IPC registered at Police Station Bharat Nagar based on the basis of settlement.... Petitioner and respondent nos. 2 and 3 are resident of same 2. CRL.M.C. 5114/2018 Page 1 of 2 locality. Parties are also related to each other.3. Subject FIR was registered consequent to a quar...
Atiq Ahmad @ Guddu & Ors. Vs.united India Insurance Co Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 08, 2018 + MAC.APP. 454/2013 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate for Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate Versus + MAC.APP. 1028/2013 ATIQ AHMAD @ GUDDU & ORS. Through: Mr. A.Rasheed Qureshi, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS ATIQ AHMAD @ GUDDU & ORS. Through: Mr. A.Rasheed Qureshi, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate for Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 30th January, 2013 grants compensation of 1. 8,74,694/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum to a Motor Mechanic-Atiq Ahmad (hereinafter referred to as Injured), aged 39 years, on account of grievous injuries suffered by him in a vehicular accident, which took place on 28th September, 2009.2. In the above captioned first appeal, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Insur...
- ‹ Prev
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- Next ›
- Last »