Kishore Kumar vs.the State & Ors

Kishore Kumar vs The State & Ors

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 08, 2018

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1218545

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1218545
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Oct 08, 2018
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kishore Kumar

Respondent

The State & Ors

Excerpt

$~73 * in the high court of delhi at new delhi % + crl.m.c. 5114/2018 judgment delivered on:08.10.2018 kishore kumar the state & ors versus ........ petitioner ........ respondents mr. nitin bansal, advocate. advocates who appeared in this case: for the... petitioners : for the... respondents : along with r-2 and r-3 in person mr. kewal singh ahuja, app for state with inspector satyapal singh, ps bharat nagar mr. prashant chakravarty, adv. for r-2 with r-3 coram:-"hon’ble mr justice sanjeev sachdeva judgment0810.2018 sanjeev sachdeva, j.(oral) crl.m.a.33717/2018 (exemption) exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. crl.m.c. 5114/2018 1.... petitioner seeks quashing of fir no.294 of 2013 under section 324 ipc registered at police station bharat nagar based on the basis of settlement.... petitioner and respondent nos. 2 and 3 are resident of same 2. crl.m.c. 5114/2018 page 1 of 2 locality. parties are also related to each other.3. subject fir was registered consequent to a quarrel that took place between the petitioner and respondent nos. 2 and 3.4. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have settled their disputes with the intervention of family members and neighbours and settlement deed dated 04.09.2018 has been executed.5. respondent nos.2 and 3 are present in person, represented by their counsel and are identified by the investigating officer. they submit that they have settled their dispute with the petitioner and do not want to continue with the present matter and has no objection in case the said fir against the petitioner is quashed.6. in view of the above, the petition is allowed. fir no.294 of 2013 under section 324 ipc registered at police station bharat nagar and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are quashed.7. order dasti under the signatures of the court master. october08 2018 nr sanjeev sachdeva, j crl.m.c. 5114/2018 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5114/2018 Judgment delivered on:08.10.2018 KISHORE KUMAR THE STATE & ORS versus ........ Petitioner

........ RESPONDENTS

Mr. Nitin Bansal, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

s : For the... RESPONDENTS

: along with R-2 and R-3 in person Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State with Inspector SatyaPal Singh, PS Bharat Nagar Mr. Prashant Chakravarty, Adv. for R-2 with R-3 CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0810.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) Crl.M.A.33717/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5114/2018 1.... Petitioner

seeks quashing of FIR No.294 of 2013 under Section 324 IPC registered at Police Station Bharat Nagar based on the basis of settlement.... Petitioner

and respondent nos. 2 and 3 are resident of same 2. CRL.M.C. 5114/2018 Page 1 of 2 locality. Parties are also related to each other.

3. Subject FIR was registered consequent to a quarrel that took place between the petitioner and respondent nos. 2 and 3.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have settled their disputes with the intervention of family members and neighbours and settlement deed dated 04.09.2018 has been executed.

5. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are present in person, represented by their counsel and are identified by the Investigating Officer. They submit that they have settled their dispute with the petitioner and do not want to continue with the present matter and has no objection in case the said FIR against the petitioner is quashed.

6. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No.294 of 2013 under Section 324 IPC registered at Police Station Bharat Nagar and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are quashed.

7. Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master. OCTOBER08 2018 NR SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J CRL.M.C. 5114/2018 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Kishore Kumar vs The State & Ors Same Subject Land Acquisition