Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chhota Salman and Anr. Vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.287/2018 Reserved on: September 18, 2018 Date of decision: October 23, 2018 % 1.2. CHHOTA SALMAN S/o Late Md. Jamshed Ali R/o I-8, Vijay Vihar, Phase-1, Shani Bazaar Road, Delhi Appellant No.1 RAMAN S/o Sh. Shyam Veer R/o H.No.G-87, Vijay Vihar, Phase-1, Delhi Through: Ms. Rebecca M. Appellant No.2 John, Senior Advocate alongwith Mr. Gaurav & Mr. Kushdeep Gaur, Advocates. versus THE STATE ... Respondent Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP alongwith SI Vijay Singh CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HONBLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGEMENT2310.2018 CRL.A. 287/2018 Page 1 of 16 I.S. Mehta, J.:1. The instant appeal assails the impugned judgment dated 22.01.2018 and order on sentence dated 30.01.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rohini Courts, New Delhi in Session Case No.149/17, arising out of FIR No.8registered at Police Station Prashant Vihar, Delhi convicting both the Appellants who were accused Nos.1 and 2 for the offence ...
Union of India & Ors vs.g.c. Yadav
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23.10.2018 % W.P.(C) 9062/2018 & C.M. No.34892/2018 UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Adv. versus G.C. YADAV ..... Respondent Through: respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. Issue notice. The respondent is present in person and he accepts notice. He states that he shall be arguing the case in person and that he is ready to proceed with the matter today itself. Accordingly, with the consent of parties, we have proceeded to hear the writ petition finally since the case involves determination of a legal issue and there is not dispute on facts. We proceed to judgment.2. The Union of India has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 17.04.2018 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, W.P.(C.) No.9062/2018 Page 1 of 12 Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribun...
Neelam Sharma vs.food Corporation of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2018
$~42 & 43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d October, 2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 333/2016 NEELAM SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Chhetri, Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Mr. Rajeev Chhetri & Ms. Meenakshi Rawat, Advocates (M- 9891675255). + + versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Paritosh Budhiraja, Ms. Surabhi Maheshwari & Mr. Ashwani Ahuja, Advocates for R-1 (M-9810100237). AND O.M.P.(COMM) 335/2016 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Paritosh Budhiraja, Ms. Surabhi Maheshwari & Mr. Ashwani Ahuja, Advocates for R-1 (M-9810100237) versus MAHAVIR RICE AND GENERAL MILLS AND PARTNERS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Chhetri, Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Mr. Rajeev Chhetri & Ms. Meenakshi Rawat, Advocates for R3 (M-9891675255) . None for other... RESPONDENTS. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) OMP (COMM) 333/2016 has been filed on 9th July, 2012 challenging 1. the award dated 27th ...
Prashant Antil vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2018
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 870/2018 Judgment delivered on:23.10.2018 PRASHANT ANTIL versus STATE ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Gulab Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State. ASI Gayatri, PS Bindapur CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2310.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.254/2018 under Section 376 IPC, Police Station Bindapur.2. The allegations against the petitioner are that the petitioner made physical relationship with the prosecutrix on the false promise to marry.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and it is a case of petitioner having been trapped for the purposes of extortion.... Petitioner has relied on an audio conversation, wherein, it is alleged that there is a demand made by the prosecutrix of Rs.2 lakhs, faili...
Rfb Latex Private Limited vs.central Board of Trustees (Cbt) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2018
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d October, 2018 + W.P.(C) 11422/2018 & CM Nos. 44159-44160/2018 1. RFB LATEX PRIVATE LIMITED Through: Mr. Mr.Kishore Kumar Behuria, Advs. versus B.B. ........ Petitioner and Pradhan CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES (CBT) & ANR Through: Mr. Satpal Singh, SC-EPFO ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The prayers in this writ petition read thus: a. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorarito the Ld. Presiding Officer Central Government Industrial Tribunal, New Delhi, to allow the Application for condonation of delay in complying the order dated 19.07.2018 passed in Appeal No.D-2/15/2018,titled as M/s. RFB Latex Limited V/s Central Board of Trustees and another. b. Allow extension of time for deposit of Rs. 12,00,000/- as per the order dated 19.07.2018 and grant stay against the order dated 06.06.2018 passed by the Respondent no.2. passed an order for de-attach the Bank ...
M/S Kolahai Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Vs.income Tax Officer
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2018
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:23. 10.2018 + W.P.(C) 10958/2017 & CM APPL. 44815/2017 M/S KOLAHAI INFOTECH PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor, Ms. Soumya Singh, Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Ms. Pallavi Saigal & Mr. Sanat Kapoor, Advocates. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the re-assessment notice issued under Sections 142, 147 and 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The respondent Revenue, on being asked to furnish the reasons to believe, upon which the impugned re-assessment notice was furnished, did so. Pertinently, the reasons to believe supplied to the petitioner, stated that according to information received by the Revenue the on the basis of a survey conducted under Section 133 (A) of th...
Sanjay Gupta vs.sunil Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2018
$~OS-8 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 579/2017 SANJAY GUPTA Date of decision 23.10.2018 ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Rajat Aneja, Mr.Akshit Kapur, AND Ms. Sonali Chopra Advs. SUNIL KUMAR GUPTA versus ..... Defendant Through Mr.Kshitiz Ahuja and Mr.Kush Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking a decree of possession in respect of suit property measuring 22 x 15 feet situated in property bearing No.E-27/4, Gopinath Building, E Block, Connaught Place, New Delhi-110001. A decree of permanent injunction and mesne profit @ Rs,1,00,000/- per month is also sought in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant from the date of institution of the present suit till the date of delivery of vacant peaceful possession of the suit property.2. The case of the plaintiff is that he is the absolute owner of the suit property being property bearing No.E-27/4, Gopinath Building, E Block, Connau...
M/S Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporation vs.m/s Ga ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:22. d October, 2018 FAO(OS) 158/2018, CM Nos. 43909-43910/2018 M/S DELHI TOURISM AND TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Through: Mr. P.C. Sen, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhimanyu Garg, Mrs. Preety Makkar, Mr. Kaustabh Singh, Advs. ..... Appellant versus M/S GAMMON INDIA LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) CM No.43909/2018 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CM No.43910/2018 (seeking condonation of delay) This is an application filed by the appellant seeking condonation of 19 days delay in filing the petition. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 19 days in filing the petition is condoned. Application stands disposed of. FAO (OS) 158/2018 Page 1 of 13 FAO(OS) 158/2018 1. This appeal has been filed under Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966 read with Section 37 of th...
Gaurav Tuli vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2018
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 2816/2014 Judgment delivered on:23.10.2018 GAURAV TULI versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. K.K. Manan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shivani Kant, Mr. Shikhar Tandon, Ms. Rashi Rampal, Ms. Akahksha Mehrotra, Ms. Komal and Mr. Mukul Aggarwal, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Pramod Kumar, PS Shalimar Bagh. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2310.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) BAIL APPLN. 2816/2014 & Crl.M.A.1894/2015 (for clarification of order dated 12.01.2015), Crl.M.A.4333/2018 (for extension of interim bail 16.12.2015) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.94/2013 under Section 376 (2)(G)/3IPC, Police Station Shalimar Bagh.2. The allegations against the petitioner are that the petitioner had committed an offence of rape on prosecutrix by giving her an BAIL APPLN. 2816/2014...
Pt Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper Tbk vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. 10.2018 + W.P.(C) 7787/2018, CM APPL. 29867-29868/2018, CM APPL. 31815/2018 PT INDAH KIAT PULP & PAPER TBK ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jitendra Singh, Ms. Monica Benjamin, Mr. Akshay Soni, Advs. & Mr. Jinendra Singhvi, Consultant. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashim Sood, CGSC with Ms. Payal Chandra and Mr. Rhythm B., Advs. for R-1 & 2. Ms. Reena Khair, Mr. Rajesh Sharma and Ms. Rita Jha, Advs. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners grievance is with respect to certain observations in the final disclosure statement, made under Rule 16 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty of Anti- Dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 (hereinafter Rules) by the Designated Authority (here...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »