Prashant Antil vs.state

Prashant Antil vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 23, 2018

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1218852

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1218852
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Oct 23, 2018
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prashant Antil

Respondent

State

Excerpt

.....has relied on an audio conversation, wherein, it is alleged that there is a demand made by the prosecutrix of rs.2 lakhs, failing which, the petitioner is threatened to be falsely implicated. bail appln. 870/2018 page 1 of 2 4.... petitioner was granted interim protection by order dated 20.04.2018 subject to the joining investigation.5. learned app for the state submits that the petitioner did join investigation and the investigation is complete and chargesheet has been filed.6. without commenting on the merits of the case, and on perusal of the records, i am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail.7. accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest, the arresting officer/io/sho shall release the petitioner on bail on his furnishing a bail bond in the sum of rs. 25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer/sho concerned.... petitioner shall not do anything that may prejudice either the trial or the prosecution witnesses.... petitioner shall not contact the prosecutrix.... petitioner shall not leave the country without the permission of the trial court.8. 9. the petition is disposed of in the above terms. order dasti under signatures of the court master october23 2018 st bail appln. 870/2018 sanjeev sachdeva, j page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 870/2018 Judgment delivered on:23.10.2018 PRASHANT ANTIL versus STATE ........ Petitioner

..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: Mr. Gulab Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State. ASI Gayatri, PS Bindapur CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2310.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner

seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.254/2018 under Section 376 IPC, Police Station Bindapur.

2. The allegations against the petitioner are that the petitioner made physical relationship with the prosecutrix on the false promise to marry.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and it is a case of petitioner having been trapped for the purposes of extortion.... Petitioner

has relied on an audio conversation, wherein, it is alleged that there is a demand made by the prosecutrix of Rs.2 lakhs, failing which, the petitioner is threatened to be falsely implicated. BAIL APPLN. 870/2018 Page 1 of 2 4.... Petitioner

was granted interim protection by order dated 20.04.2018 subject to the joining investigation.

5. Learned APP for the State submits that the petitioner did join investigation and the investigation is complete and chargesheet has been filed.

6. Without commenting on the merits of the case, and on perusal of the records, I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail.

7. Accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest, the arresting officer/IO/SHO shall release the petitioner on bail on his furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/Investigating Officer/SHO concerned.... Petitioner

shall not do anything that may prejudice either the trial or the prosecution witnesses.... Petitioner

shall not contact the prosecutrix.... Petitioner

shall not leave the country without the permission of the Trial Court.

8. 9. The Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master OCTOBER23 2018 st BAIL APPLN. 870/2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Prashant Antil vs State Same Subject Criminal